Researchers warn: Military must prepare now for “mutant” combat in future
Now imagine a future battlefield teeming with amphetamine-fueled pilots, a cyborg infantry and commanders whose brains have been shocked into achieving otherwise impossible levels of tactical cunning.
These enhancements and others have tremendous combat potential, the researchers state. “Somewhere in between robotics and biomedical research, we might arrive at the perfect future warfighter: one that is part machine and part human, striking a formidable balance between technology and our frailties.”
In this possible mutant future, what enhancements should be regulated by international law, or banned outright? If an implant malfunctions or a drug causes unexpected side effects, who’s responsible? And if one side deploys a terrifying cyborg army, could that spark a devastating arms race as nations scramble to out-enhance each other? “Does the possibility that military enhancements will simply lead to a continuing arms race mean that it is unethical to even begin to research or employ them?” Lin, Mehlman and Abney wonder.
The report authors also question whether the military shouldn’t get give potential enhancement subjects the right to opt out, even though the subjects are otherwise subject to military training, rules and discipline.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Sounds like the average Internet cafe.
apostic on December 31, 2012 at 3:32 PM
What an idiotic article.
Seriously – though you could, and we probably will, construct robotic warfighters – I do not see any “blending” of man and machine here.
Never served with soldiers – but served with plenty of Marines. They are hard core – gung ho to the bone, especially the Recon guys I’m familiar with.
Yet – even THEY didn’t see “soldiering” as such an important part of their life that they’d be willing to turn themselves into part machine – or “drug up” to become some kind of super-weapon. I knew a few who did steroids … but hell, plenty of people in civilian life do those.
A Soldier isn’t going to sacrifice his future private life to become some kind of robotic “Sgt. York”.
HondaV65 on December 31, 2012 at 3:38 PM
Killer rabbits unleashed upon an unsuspecting nation?
sharrukin on December 31, 2012 at 3:40 PM
Well, you know the Chinese and Russians will try it. They don`t care about their people. So we should be ready for it.
ThePrez on December 31, 2012 at 3:45 PM
Well, we’re fighting mutant politicians right now so a mutant army is very plausible.
darwin on December 31, 2012 at 3:51 PM
How many movies have been made on this subject?
meci on December 31, 2012 at 4:04 PM
Kinda sad Deathlok didn’t make it to a movie before everything else in the movies caught up and passed it.
apostic on December 31, 2012 at 4:15 PM
The irony that the “Danger Room” column on Wired.com is talking about mutants, is completely lost on the writer.
BigGator5 on December 31, 2012 at 4:15 PM
So as proof of the mutant future he trots out a 10 year old example of an air force pilot using amphetamines. uh huuuuuh
The military has nothing at all that enhances human performance, just exercise like always. The use of meds to stay awake was very limited in scope and designed to prevent bad things like sleeping pilots crashing, not to enhance performance.
kaltes on December 31, 2012 at 4:27 PM
Yes, but many other states (including, not coincidentally, most or all potential enemies of the United States) are not married to a proud military of free citizens.
HitNRun on December 31, 2012 at 5:35 PM
Why not? Darth Vader was pretty badass.
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on December 31, 2012 at 5:54 PM
“Duty, Honor, Country”
claudius on December 31, 2012 at 6:52 PM