When the robots take over the world
Again, this doesn’t necessarily matter if the rewards of this revolution are spread equitably through society, but it obviously matters a lot if the owners of the robots – or the capital – monopolise all the wealth that they create.
Indeed, it can reasonably be argued that this is already happening, with inequality steeply on the rise in both advanced and developing economies.
And if you think about it, that’s actually what did occur in the early stages of the industrial revolution, when an extreme divide developed between capital and labour.
None the less, society eventually managed to get through it, and the spoils of these productivity revolutions became more widely shared. Capitalism has repeatedly adapted to survive, and it will do so again. When societies don’t, their leaders tend to be quite swiftly dispatched to the guillotine.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I for one welcome our new robot overlords.
rbj on December 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM
what a silly perspective. How was equality in ancient egypt or any other freaking place pre-industrial era?
rob verdi on December 29, 2012 at 3:34 PM
People keeping the wealth that they create?
The horror.
Quick – kill them before they make any more wealth!!!
Rebar on December 29, 2012 at 3:44 PM
I, for one, am perfectly fine in a world where there is a huge divide between rich and poor (such as today) when the quality of life for everyone is higher than it would be otherwise.
When being “poor” in the U.S. usually involves obesity, having a car, owning consumer electronics that wealthy people 80 years ago could only dream of, etc it’s tough to truly argue that we’d be better off pre-industrial revolution simply because people believe there was a magic period where we were all equally poor and miserable.
JadeNYU on December 29, 2012 at 4:02 PM
The argument in favor of Communism was silly at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, a century and a half ago.
And it has become even more idiotic with every year that’s passed since then.
logis on December 29, 2012 at 5:27 PM
Will they look like Obama?
VorDaj on December 29, 2012 at 6:08 PM
LOL, what equality??? Besides that outside of the very VERY rich, everyone’s life more or less sucked.
MelonCollie on December 29, 2012 at 9:16 PM