Hmmm: Iran may be reconsidering support for Assad
[F]aced with the slow-motion collapse of Assad’s regime, senior Iranian officials and clerics appear to be increasingly divided about how to respond. Under an Iranian peace plan unveiled this month, the Syrian president would remain in power through elections in 2014, although he could run again.
“The debate behind the curtains among experts and officials regarding the Syrian crisis is very hot,” said an Iranian journalist with close ties to the office of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Staunch support for Bashar Assad’s regime is costing the Islamic Republic of Iran a lot.”
Shiite Muslim Iran faces increasing isolation if Assad is overthrown by predominantly Sunni Muslim rebels supported by Iran’s regional rivals in the Persian Gulf. Iran would lose a key part of an anti-Israel alliance it has nurtured since the 1980s. And at a time when it faces tough international sanctions because of its nuclear program, Iran risks complicating its problems by being regarded as an obstacle on Syria.
Focusing the blame for the “Syria debacle” could also affect Iran’s next presidential election, scheduled for June.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
davidk on December 29, 2012 at 3:07 PM
I doubt the result of Iranian elections would be affected by any external factors or if history has taught us anything internal factors such as voters for that matter.
lester on December 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM
Are there any stories about Islamic shenanigans that are not written or co wrote by Muslims any more?
BL@KBIRD on December 29, 2012 at 3:24 PM
Because, the LAT has insight into the minds of the Iranian Mullahs.
BKeyser on December 29, 2012 at 3:28 PM
LOL. What a farce. They’re ALL anti-Israel in the arab world. Iran would just lose out its anti-Israel satellite to a competing Israel-hating arab alliance. But it’s not as if Sunni Israel-haters wouldn’t be happy to take part in some attack on Israel just because of Iran. After all, hamas is sunni and they are buddies with Iran, helping in their section of the “anti-Israel alliance” – and that is even in the face of hamas being muslim brotherhood and intimately connected to figures in Egypt and, now, thanks to Barky and the dems, Egypt’s new dictator.
The same way Iran works with al quaeda when it suits their purposes, whatever group of lunatics takes over Syria will be happy to help Iran’s threats on Israel, though it might cost Iran a bit more cash. In the end, though, everyone knows that any arab can be rented – especially for anti-Israel acitivity. There are nothing but “anti-Israel alliances” in the arab world.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on December 29, 2012 at 3:29 PM
Iran will “reconsider” it’s support for their side in Syria at about the same time the LAT “reconsiders” it’s support for Obama.
VorDaj on December 29, 2012 at 6:04 PM