Comments on: Arafat’s widow: He planned the second intifada after Camp David

By: logis

logis — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:23:00 +0000

And, lest we forget, arafat was the NUMBER ONE visitor to the Clinton White House. NUMBER ONE. By miles.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on December 29, 2012 at 2:49 PM

And these “recent revelations” have nothing to do with anything. All it requires are simple reasoning skills.

There are, and were, only two possibilities. Either:

A) Yasser Arafat was controlling the terrorists, or

B) Yasser Arafat wasn’t controlling the terrorists.

No matter which possibility was true, there was no rational reason to try and “negotiate” with the man.

By: CorporatePiggy

CorporatePiggy — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:13:28 +0000

We can all be proud that Suha is living extremely high off the hog from all the ‘aid’ money the west gave to the Paleostinians.

Yassir really believed in spreading that wealth around…into his various personal bank accounts.

One of many examples of your tax dollars in foreign aid at work.

By: ThePrimordialOrderedPair

ThePrimordialOrderedPair — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:49:29 +0000

And, lest we forget, arafat was the NUMBER ONE visitor to the Clinton White House. NUMBER ONE. By miles.

Leftists love their barbaric, muslim terrorists and Indonesian dog-eating imbeciles. They just can’t get enough of them.

By: logis

logis — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:45:21 +0000

What, like he needed a reason? When have any of them needed that?
Eren on December 29, 2012 at 2:12 PM

The only “reason” Camp David gave for attacks was that it took away absolutely every possible reason to attack.

…And, of course, Islamicists saw that as yet another reason to attack.

By: Sekhmet

Sekhmet — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:31:37 +0000

They had that big infusion of cash from Syria, once Hafez Assad died, and the nations who were containing Syria were found to merely be containing Hafez.Never mind that the same clowns were running the show as before in Syria, and Bashar Assad was Hafez’s frickin’ SON, a new day dawned when Hafez Assad died, and nobody wanted to continue sanctions on Syria.

Now, with Saddam Hussein getting up there in years in Iraq, there being even more oil on the table in Iraq, and a number of American “allies” known to be on the take from Iran in the Oil-for-Food program, tell me again why we went to war in Iraq?

By: Eren

Eren — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:12:03 +0000

What, like he needed a reason? When have any of them needed that?

By: ThePrimordialOrderedPair

ThePrimordialOrderedPair — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:08:01 +0000

Arafat’s widow: He planned the second intifada after Camp David

Well … duh!

Only the truly brain dead would have considered the timing coincidental. Only the long dead would have thought that the PLO wasn’t running the primitives in the territories with an iron fist.

But, I guess it’s nice that Arafat’s beard says it directly enough for even the leftists to have to acknowledge. ANother notch in Clinton’s cap as a great peacemaker, I guess. Or just the original mistranslation of ~~RESET~~ OVERCHARGED!!

Doesn’t matter. Clintons and leftists don’t care about details or truth. Those things just get in the way of their nihilistic drive into the abyss.

By: rbj

rbj — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:06:39 +0000

I might be martyred, but I shall bequeath our historical heritage to Zahwa and to the children of Palestine,

Yeah, a culture of death. Great heritage there, scumbag.

By: Schadenfreude

Schadenfreude — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:59:25 +0000

Didn’t they unearth him, again? What did he die of?

By: Paul-Cincy

Paul-Cincy — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:53:05 +0000

They want me to betray the Palestinian cause. They want me to give up on our principles, and I will not do so

The principle of saying one thing and doing the opposite. Lying. Like liberals.