The lessons of Benghazi
That we operated with a skeleton staff in such a precarious environment is clear evidence that we failed to connect the dots. That is a mistake we simply can’t afford to make again – in Libya or anywhere else with an American diplomatic presence. The State Department must adjust the security posture of diplomatic facilities in high-risk regions based on responsible, timely analysis of the best information available. We can no longer expect to rely primarily on host nations to protect American diplomats in all parts of the world…
Perhaps most concerning is that the report points to specific failures in the State Department’s chain of command. The Board’s co-chairs have assured us that Secretary Clinton supports their findings and recommendations, and informed us that four senior officials have resigned following the release of the Board’s report. However, questions still remain about why higher level officials in the Department, who were actively overseeing America’s relationship with the new Libyan government less than a year after the death of Muammar Qaddafi, could have been unaware about the security situation in Benghazi and not done more to protect U.S. personnel and facilities there.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
“mistake”
you keep using that word…..
WTF
lm10001 on December 27, 2012 at 2:49 PM
The Next In Line does not want to upset the applecart and irritate the media, who worked very very hard to cover this up.
kim roy on December 27, 2012 at 2:55 PM
Apparently, Rubio or more likely whoever tells Rubio what his policy stances are decided that it is political beneficial for him to be more hawkish than McCain.
Illinidiva on December 27, 2012 at 3:00 PM
Rubio has really bought into the administration’s Benghazi story – he is an idiot.
Pork-Chop on December 27, 2012 at 3:03 PM
The media is corrupt. Rubio is just trying to make sure his words can’t be twisted.
We need to do stupid things like this because we aren’t fighting the media.
I guess this is what conservatives do…roll over and take it.
What we should do is organize and fight.
GardenGnome on December 27, 2012 at 3:21 PM
I greatly admire the lucidity of Marco Rubio. He is precise, and both discreet, and discrete. I want to have someone with his capabilities in charge of the Senate one day (although admittedly he could be formidable), and someone of his capabilities could easily run the WH
Therefore, I am interested in the HA responders who noticed the carefully placed use of the word ‘mistake’. Pretty good observation
Even the article is interesting for the fact it was written
Have to admit Rubio works from within the Senate, and not without. The old dogs must be fed, as we see from the Tea Party culling going on in the House, the dogs will keep the pack pure.
You can run from the Presidency from the outside, or be carried by the Dogs of the inside.
I do not want to lose Rubio, because talent is sparse inside the fortress, but thuggery blooms. Rubio is like the ole hound dog I had to pass to get to my home as a kid. He would eye me, and the one eye was a warning I might have to run. That dog had a lot of power, with one eye closed
entagor on December 27, 2012 at 3:34 PM
The lessons are:
1. Never trust Killary as having your back.
2. Never trust Obama for taking care of things.
3. Repeat number 1 and 2 above.
trs on December 27, 2012 at 3:36 PM
By the looks of things, America doesn’t learn lessons, it take advice from friendly acting Muslims.
BL@KBIRD on December 27, 2012 at 3:52 PM
If this is true, why was this even our policy to begin with, especially in that area???
hopeful on December 27, 2012 at 5:01 PM