“They sort of smiled, winked and nodded too often when they should have been calling ‘crazy, crazy’”
“The Tea Party put a lot of steel in the spine of the Republican Party,” said Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma.
But the Tea Party activists have not been front and center in the fiscal fight. And Mr. Cole added that Tea Party leaders now excoriating Mr. Boehner for offering higher taxes in a budget deal did not recognize political reality.
“These guys want instant success,” said Mr. Cole, a member of the House Republican leadership. “If they want to see a better result, they’ve got to help us win the United States Senate. We’ve thrown away some seats out of political immaturity.”…
“I think the Tea Party movement is to the Republicans in 2013 what the McGovernites were to the Democrats in 1971 and 1972,” said Don Gaetz, a Republican who is the president of the Florida Senate. “They will cost Republicans seats in Congress and in state legislatures. But they will also help Republicans win seats.”
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
why are all the tea party leader so fat?
renalin on December 26, 2012 at 8:55 AM
Why is your head so fat? Is that the reason why you can’t formulate complete and articulate comments?
Blake on December 26, 2012 at 9:03 AM
God Bless the Tea Party movement. The one lone voice of reason in the cacophony of political and fiscal insanity.
HotAirian on December 26, 2012 at 9:04 AM
One of them situated in the Oval Office, on two successive attempts: 2008, and 2012.
That is what Gaetz was burbling about, right…?
Kent18 on December 26, 2012 at 9:08 AM
Why is it that — whenever any given Boehner shill or sycophant is asked who or what is to blame in any given situation, their immediate, instinctive reaction is to spin about and commence p!ssing aggressively upon the closest clutch of conservatives…?
Kent18 on December 26, 2012 at 9:17 AM
Old fashioned party guy candidates have lost more close Senate races than Tea Party types in the last couple cycles.
The Republican Party can’t win Senate seats in North Dakota and Montana let alone Florida and Virginia and they are looking for anybody else to blame.
forest on December 26, 2012 at 9:19 AM
Without the Tea Party, Maerose Prizzi would still be Speaker of the House.
If “mods” are all the rage, then why did Scott Brown, Linda McMahon, and Tommy Thompson lose, huh, Mr GOPe?
Resist We Much on December 26, 2012 at 9:23 AM
Dana Loesch would like a word with you.
Resist We Much on December 26, 2012 at 9:24 AM
From the article, descriptions of the Tea Party:
Great. Thanks, NYT. Your bias doesn’t change anything, though. I’ll lay it out in pseudo code for you:
if(government.spending<government.revenue) {
continue();
} else {
government.debt++;
}
if(government.debt>government.effectiveCreditRating){
default();
}
Hint: This program won’t continue for long on the current trajectory.
Nephew Sam on December 26, 2012 at 9:26 AM
No. They expected an ‘instant’ change in the methods of governing.
Math is a science. Liberal ideologues too often choose ideology over science. The TEA party expected a respect for that science..and they mostly got ideological excuses.
Mimzey on December 26, 2012 at 9:30 AM
The establishment GOP is cowardly and meddling. The Christians are wooed by preachery speechifying by the wrong kinds of folks for the office, and go high-maintenance the moment everybody realizes they made a mistake. The Tea Party has fits of mindless anti-establishmentarianism where they try and reinvent the wheel, and get unpleasantly shocked when round wheels beat their triangular creations. Darn that establishment for insisting wheels be round!
We can’t afford the establishment’s cowardice, and we can’t afford to be stupid. We also can’t afford to alienate people we need voting our way. So what is the solution?
Sekhmet on December 26, 2012 at 9:33 AM
Blake on December 26, 2012 at 9:03 AM
have you seen the size of amy kremer? hard to preach fiscal restraint when your the size of a mack truck.
renalin on December 26, 2012 at 9:37 AM
Give an example of a Tea Party “fit” insisting on a “triangular wheels” process as you call it..
HotAirian on December 26, 2012 at 9:38 AM
renalin
Your an idiot, I mean really, really, really, dumb.
rob verdi on December 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM
What do you mean??
Mimzey on December 26, 2012 at 9:45 AM
And we lost 2012 because everybody pinky-swore to Romney back during 2008′s primary, and everything onwards was seen through the lens of whether or not it benefits Romney, not whether or not Republicans benefit. Rather than trying to develop a relationship with the Tea Party for 2012, they were an obstacle for Romney.
Sekhmet on December 26, 2012 at 9:45 AM
Yes, fiscal sanity to prevent the nation from bankruptcy sure is a crazy proposition, you all gotta agree.
Rebar on December 26, 2012 at 9:49 AM
So you believe that the conservatives that sat out the election were mostly TEA party members?
Just trying to understand your position.
Mimzey on December 26, 2012 at 9:50 AM
You want triangular wheels? Try perpetual sacrificial lamb Christine O’Donnell. Sacrificial lambs are a Bad Idea as serious candidates for an office. There is often a store of material the opposition holds in reserve for the day the incumbent is caught with an underage hooker, and the lamb often overestimates his/her popularity and ideological conformance, when for years they have merely been the poor bastard dumb enough to run against Senator Bringsthepork. The Maher tapes should not have been a surprise. That was the “reserve.” This is what folks were trying to warn the Tea Partiers in Delaware.
Sekhmet on December 26, 2012 at 9:58 AM
The tea party is a whacky fringe movement that needs to be consigned to the trash heap of history.
Anyone who objects to unsustainable deficit spending and the devaluation of the dollar as a path to Utopia is a racist.
CorporatePiggy on December 26, 2012 at 9:59 AM
I don’t think the stay-at-homes were active Tea Party members. But I think most of them were sympathetic to the Tea Party, and saw themselves as having no place at the table in 2012. The establishment was caught in the amber of the spring of 2008, and thought they could pick up Romney where McCain left off.
Sekhmet on December 26, 2012 at 10:08 AM
Try perpetual sacrificial lamb Christine O’Donnell.
That would be the person who the primary. Beat Mike Castle, who’s major GOP advantage would be that he would have voted for Mitch McConnell as Majority Floor Leader (And who had things gotten tight or tough, I believe had a better than even chance of fleeing the GOP a la Jeffords/Chaffee). Bennett, Lugar, Castle coudn’t get their own state party(ies) to support them.
JFKY on December 26, 2012 at 10:45 AM
If the Tea Party saw a real opportunity in Delaware, they should have found their own candidate to knock out both Castle and O’Donnell, or taken a pass on the Tea Party pickup in Delaware and let things play out. They decided to get involved well past the filing deadline, and didn’t know enough to say no to O’Donnell.
Sekhmet on December 26, 2012 at 11:07 AM
rob verdi on December 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM
as opposed to the garbage you spew out? i wouldn’t be talking friend.
your pretty stupid too. LOL
renalin on December 26, 2012 at 11:29 AM
taken a pass on the Tea Party pickup in Delaware and let things play out.</b.
Say do you coach your sports team equivalently? "Let's pass on this win, and hope for a win NEXT week?"
JFKY on December 26, 2012 at 11:29 AM
Whigs.
Bmore on December 26, 2012 at 11:58 AM
If (governmentspending<revenue)then
continue(); else,
L.i.B.
davidk on December 26, 2012 at 12:01 PM