Comments on: Hey, let’s ban bullets

By: Resist We Much

Resist We Much — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:52:23 +0000

Flashback: Clinton Requests $60 Million to Put Cops in Schools

By: Alberta_Patriot

Alberta_Patriot — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:45:35 +0000

davidk on December 25, 2012 at 11:58 AM

I'm not sure what you're getting at, though I may not have been clear in my post. I was pointing out that the 2nd Amendment obviously and implicitly includes access to ammunition (as well as tools, cleaning solution, oil and anything essential to the proper care and maintenance of a firearm).

By: CorporatePiggy

CorporatePiggy — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:21:47 +0000

We’re not even allowed to own fully automatic machine guns.

It’s kind of hard to get ahold of genuine machine guns but you can get select fire weapons if you get a Class 3 stamp and you don’t mind the price.

By: Galt2009

Galt2009 — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:21:19 +0000

DC Police Investigating NBC’s Gregory for Brandishing Illegal Magazine
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/12/25/D-C-Police-Investigating-NBC-s-Gregory-For-Violations-of-Gun-Banning-Laws#disqus_thread

Washington D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier has confirmed that the department is looking into allegations that NBC’s David Gregory violated D.C.’s gun banning laws during a recent taping of Meet the Press.

By: Rip Ford

Rip Ford — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:15:02 +0000

How about we just ban idiots who think there are “semi-automatic assault rifles” from participating in the gun control discussion.

By: claudius

claudius — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:06:47 +0000

The libs will float outrageous ideas, then get “reasonable” and do something like propose a ban on internet sales of ammo. Will the Republicans rise to the bait?

By: turfmann

turfmann — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:00:48 +0000

It’s becoming increasingly clear that the only way to restore liberty is to do away with liberals.
darwin on December 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM

And, ergo, their irrational fear of a legally armed citizenry.

Just as Mr. Madison intended.

They shouldn’t be frightened – they should be scared sh!tless

By: Resist We Much

Resist We Much — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:59:31 +0000

We’re not even allowed to own fully automatic machine guns.

If you get a federal licence, you can.

By: Resist We Much

Resist We Much — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:58:43 +0000

Hello Kitty Weighs In On The Assault Weapons Ban a/k/a The Prohibition On Certain Guns With Cosmetic Changes That Make Them Look Skeery And Are Painted Skeery (And Racist!) Black Act of 1994 Kewl.

By: HitNRun

HitNRun — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:51:41 +0000

For example, we’re not (individually) allowed to own aircraft carriers, tanks, ballistic nuclear missiles, fighter aircraft, or attack submarines.

We’re not even allowed to own fully automatic machine guns.

All of those are “arms.”

And yet we have established that, despite the Second Amendment, we’re not individually allowed to bear them.

Yeah, see, this is the crux of the liberal misunderstanding. We have established no such thing.

The courts and legislators have established it, unlawfully and tyrannically. The fact that a critical mass of people have decided to live with this usurpation of our power because it makes for a more comfortable life does not make it legitimate and, more pointedly, does not lend it legal weight for logical extrapolation.

We the People do not say that the world would not be a better place without certain kinds of speech or guns. We say that we do not recognize the existence or legitimacy of a government that would presume to make these decisions.