Why on earth would anyone want Boehner’s job?
Most people would agree that it’s unlikely that, for lack of a better term, an “establishment” member of the House GOP caucus would challenge Boehner. So any challenge is more likely to come from a conservative frustrated with his lack of progress on cutting spending. But right now, if you’re a conservative in the House, the current state of affairs is quite good with Boehner in charge — at least as far as your career is concerned. You get to blast any deal that gets struck, reiterating your support for lowering taxes, reducing spending and reforming entitlements — all of which burnishes your “true conservative” credentials. You get to go home to your constituents and attack back door Washington dealmaking. And if no deal gets struck and Republicans get blamed for any consequences that ensue, it’s Boehner that will absorb punishment as the public face of the party. Sure, the media will generically blast “tea party extremists” — but no individual member will be singled out for blame. And individual members can argue that if only Boehner had listened to them and pursued a different strategy, Republicans could have won the showdown. But if you’re actually in charge, suddenly you’re the one in the cross hairs. You become tainted by the Washington process. And because everybody who is being intellectually honest knows that Obama will never sign on to a small government agenda, you’re destined to be ineffective and to lose your conservative street cred.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Makes him want to cry…
albill on December 23, 2012 at 10:34 AM
So is this the meme du jour?
davidk on December 23, 2012 at 10:35 AM
To annoy the folks at MSNBC?
radjah shelduck on December 23, 2012 at 10:45 AM
Because, as evidenced by the mid 1990′s and Newt Gingrich you can change America for the better by rolling back government. How many people would not want to have that job? Well, I guess anyone who was more interested in just themselves. But that begs the question, what the hell is the reason Boehner wants the job? Is it because he wants to block anyone else from being able to help America? By his action, I would argue that is what he intends.
astonerii on December 23, 2012 at 10:49 AM
I feel for Boehner and his impossible situation. I support the goals of the Tea Party, and I understand other people’s frustration with big government. We need to be rational and help Boehner get the best deal he can without the GOP being blamed for the downside of Obama’s economy. If we look like lunatics in how we attack Boehner, 2014 will not be another 2010. If we want change instead of us displaying out purity, we need 2014 to be another 2010.
thuja on December 23, 2012 at 10:51 AM
Either they don’t know who they’re dealing with or they want to keep their swank lifetime gig. Their lifer job is about buying more time for themselves. No more sympathy. Play for keeps or don’t play at all. That’s what the opposition’s doing.
Dongemaharu on December 23, 2012 at 11:02 AM
First, its not John Boehners’ job. Its a function of the US Constitution. Boehner is merely the person fulfilling the requirement at present.
And he’s doing a terrible job. I would love to be the most powerful legislator on the planet. Boehner doesn’t seem to understand the duty or power of that office.
Sometimes, you just gotta let’em go.
BobMbx on December 23, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Oh I don’t know. Maybe because they have ego, ideas, and leadership—rather than just ego and an inability to get things done.
arnold ziffel on December 23, 2012 at 11:03 AM
To be the one man that history can point to and say without him the experiment in individual freedom that began with Washington and the founders wouldn’t have disappeared under Obama’s marxist polices.
Boehner is in a position to be the churchill of our time. Instead he will be remembered for crying. What a putz. I guess some people can’t see the forest for the trees.
unseen on December 23, 2012 at 11:08 AM
load of crap. being rational cost us the POTUS, the senate and seats in the house. being rational allows Obama to dodge responsibility for a crappy economy, being rational allows liberals to continue to destroy the country in the name of progress. Being rational means losing not only the debate but the country.
this isn’t about “purity” this is about fundemental transforming the country and if we want to be a part of that transformation. I vote No. the US consitution has been good enough for 200 odd years, capitalism has given us welathy unheard of, freedom has allowed us to change the world for the better in every sphere of influence, All have given us the strongest military in the world.
Being “rational” means going the marxist socialist route. The elites intelligent rational people all think that is the rational course. Its the “hicks” the rednecks the irrational people that still believe in individual responsibility, paying ones bills, lower taxes = better economy. Smaller government > bigger government.
rational gets you nothing be an inviation to the animal farm
unseen on December 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM
the speaker should have put up a bill that keeps taxes the same or better yet lowers tax rates. then dare Reid and Obama to veto it. simple.
unseen on December 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM
That presupposes that all members of Congress are careerist douchetools, who want to preen and posture and not really have to take responsibility for doing anything. That’s true for some of the old boys, for sure. I’m not so sure the 2010ers have caught the disease yet.
S. Weasel on December 23, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Yep, true. Lets see a CINO become the Speaker. When he/she has to administer and govern, we’ll see what happens. Can’t spout rhetoric game anymore.
tommy71 on December 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM
Because somebody has to do it.
Why on earth would anyone want to storm a beach in Normandy. But somebody had to.
JellyToast on December 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM
If you mean speed bump, then, yeah, I wouldn’t want it. If you mean Speaker of the House. That wouldn’t be a bad gig.
besser tot als rot on December 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM
A Republican Speaker of the House should at least be able to articulate conservative and free market principles in at least a marginally persuasive manner. Boehner cannot. (Neither could Romney.)
besser tot als rot on December 23, 2012 at 12:59 PM
That is why I don’t think any of the “true conservatives” will run for the position. They don’t want the responsibility. Their power is based on criticism of whoever is in charge, not from actually BEING in charge. The entire meme of their existence is on casting blame. It’s always “the establishment” or “lack of leadership” or whatever. None of them are actually going to step up and take on a leadership role and take responsibility for what happens. They are going to sit on the back benches and criticize. It is very easy to come up with clever sound bites when you aren’t responsible for what happened. Notice that the REAL leaders are actually leaving the Congress and taking on other roles. Jim DeMint, for example. Look at Mike Pence. Now there is a strong Republican leader. He left Congress and ran for governor of Indiana. THERE is your future leaders. The ones who sit in Congress and complain about “the establishment” without actually getting out front and offering REAL alternatives but sit there and simply criticize whatever comes along need to go.
crosspatch on December 23, 2012 at 1:14 PM
@besser Boehner articulates that very well. Has nothing to do with Romney. Face reality, he heads only the House. His game is limited. If the pubs don’t like him, take him down. No problemo. Let the so-called rhetorical Conservatives elect their Speaker. When it comes to administering or governing, its a different ballgame. It’ll be fun to then watch the CINO’s tear their own guy/gal down.
tommy71 on December 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM
For example, John McCain’s base of power was that he would often attack the Republican party from the left. He was the darling of the media … right up until he ran for President. At that moment me became the GOP and there was no way the media was going to support him. Sarah Palin was an extremely popular Governor with approval ratings over 80% among all of the people in Alaska right up until the moment she accepted the nomination for President. She fought big oil. She didn’t run to the aid of the Old Boy network when Ted Stevens was accused of things. But the SECOND she accepted the nomination for President, the entire base of support collapsed.
If one of these back benchers decides to stand up and take a position of leadership, they will be ripped to shreds by the other back benchers whose base of power is founded on nothing more than criticism. The person stepping forward will be picked apart and eventually be blamed. The Republicans have no sense of party loyalty. They don’t stand up for each other. They don’t because there is no consequence for their actions and, in fact, they get in the paper more by being critical because the papers WANT to publish criticism of Republicans. So if someone wants to be a big name and be quoted a lot in the press, the way to do that is to bash other Republicans.
How much play do people who support Boehner get here on Hot Air in the various articles vs. people critical of him? How much have you read here about what Paul Ryan might have to say? Who has reach out to Ryan to even plumb what he might have to say? Nobody. What you read is the criticism because that is what gets their name in front of you. Until that changes, the Republicans are going to spend most of the time fighting with each other. I see “true conservatives” bad-mouthing the Republicans more than they criticize the Democrats. Politically, the “true conservatives” are the best political ally the Democrats have right now.
crosspatch on December 23, 2012 at 1:30 PM