He and Mark Steyn are the only two (off the top of my head) who have uncommon common sense, as well as a sense of history.

My primary quibble is with something VERY IMPORTANT that Mr. McCarthy left out:

With regard to that latter massacre in Benghazi, a State Department report issued this week could not help but condemn the reckless security lapses even as its authors whitewashed the culpability of Secretary Clinton. They also sidestepped the simple, central questions to which Washington, after three months, cannot produce answers: How and when during the seven-hour terrorist siege did President Obama learn about it, and what orders did he give to mobilize available military assets to protect the Americans who were under attack?

[Editor ShainS added: and ...] What was Ambassador Stevens doing — at a CIA safehouse, NOT a “consulate” as continually reported/repeated à la The Big Lie — in Benghazi?

Fixed it for Seven Percent Solution and me …

Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider” (Part III), Canada Free Press

[Obama is] advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia, the Muslim Brotherhood in North Africa, Middle East. We’re doing their work, pitting ourselves against Syria, Iran and ultimately Russia and China.