Seven codes you’ll never, ever break
Few encrypted texts are as mysterious – or as tantalizing – as the Voynich manuscript, a book dating to either 15th- or 16th-century Italy and written in a language no one understands, about a subject that no one can figure out, and involving illustrations of plants that don’t exist. Plus it’s got Zodiac symbols, astrological charts, illustrations of medicinal herbs, and drawings of naked women bathing while hooked up to tubes. The manuscript’s 246 calfskin pages were perhaps meant for alchemy or medieval medicine, but no one knows for sure.
What we do know is that it’s written in a language distinct from any European language, and follows a pattern unique to its own. The alphabet ranges from 19 to 28 letters, with an average word length consistent with Greek- or Latin-derived languages, but is missing two-letter words while repeating words at a much higher rate than other European languages. All told, the book has 170,000 characters in it, written from left to right, and there are no punctuation marks.
William Friedman, one of the 20th century’s greatest cryptographers, couldn’t figure it out and suspected Voynich was a constructed, artificial language. (With no Rosetta Stone to help translate.) German computer scientist Klaus Schmeh suspected a hoax, and also suggested the manuscript’s original language could have been encoded in a much larger set of “meaningless filler text.” But there’s no system for separating out the real text from the junk. Linguist and computer scientist Gordon Rugg also concluded the manuscript was a hoax.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
You’ll never break the code to my heart, baby.
dczombie on December 22, 2012 at 10:49 PM
Heh, this reminds me…
P#qoq 411чb nvvVv 7&Ыl+ 50057 Xzzzl ..36a yffж[
True story.
Gingotts on December 22, 2012 at 10:52 PM
Sounds like a lot of HotAir.
dczombie on December 22, 2012 at 10:54 PM
They can’t break the code, so obviously its a hoax! That makes a lot of sense. Lol
tommy71 on December 22, 2012 at 10:54 PM
Or HotGas…
dczombie on December 22, 2012 at 10:54 PM
Aliens left it of course. They were here illegally then too…
Logus on December 22, 2012 at 11:07 PM
Which code? That Dana Loesch is suing Breitbart.com? Thats breakable.
tommy71 on December 22, 2012 at 11:35 PM
Tolkien’s original attempt at Lord of the Rings in the original Primitive Quendian.
RoadRunner on December 22, 2012 at 11:37 PM
Actually, it probably is a hoax.
I watched a documentary on the Voynich manuscript just a few days ago and they went into great detail at one point about computer programs that analyze language patterns.
They said the pattern in this manuscript doesn’t match any known language.
But the more important thing that makes them think it’s a hoax is that there is not one single correction in the entire manuscript. No errors. Nothing scratched out and redone. The experts say that is the biggest clue that it’s a hoax. When writing nonsensical words you can’t mess up. Therefore, no corrections to make.
ButterflyDragon on December 22, 2012 at 11:54 PM
I bet the Zodiac Killer laughed all the way to his (likely natural) deathbed, knowing the piece-of-crap “code” he left as clues to his murders, were all gibberish.
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on December 23, 2012 at 12:04 AM
@ButterflyDragon The pattern doesn’t match any known language. Its possible that it ain’t a present day known language. Secondly, what if the writer DIDN’T make any errors? No corrections necessary. 400-500 years ago, writing was considered a patient and careful task. Not like the present day. IMO
tommy71 on December 23, 2012 at 12:13 AM
I personally don’t care one way or the other. I’m just telling you what numerous experts who study old texts have said. All of them that have studied it have said it was very strange there is not a single correction in the entire manuscript.
ButterflyDragon on December 23, 2012 at 12:26 AM
@ButterflyDragon Kewl, thanks for the info. That is to be expected from the experts nowadays. They’ll never admit that they don’t know. It offends their professional ego. So give various reasons, and spin it as a hoax. Some will not call it so, they’ll instead cast doubts on its true meaning. And I’m rambling on and on. Sorry.
tommy71 on December 23, 2012 at 12:37 AM
It’s all Greek, to me.
OldEnglish on December 23, 2012 at 12:43 AM
@OldEnglish lol
tommy71 on December 23, 2012 at 12:46 AM
“Eep opp ork ah-ah” means “I love you.”
Odysseus on December 23, 2012 at 7:29 AM
It looks almost as hard as figuring out the tax code.
RadClown on December 23, 2012 at 8:07 AM
They can’t figure out God, so He’s a hoax.
davidk on December 23, 2012 at 8:17 AM
I’ve decoded all of them; they say the same thing: “Lord give the American people the wisdom not to elect crooked community organizers from Chicago as president.”
radjah shelduck on December 23, 2012 at 8:29 AM
Odysseus that was PERFECT!
CrimsonFisted on December 23, 2012 at 8:59 AM
It’s a cookbook! A cookbook!
SagebrushPuppet on December 23, 2012 at 9:45 AM
I remember that episode of The Twilight Zone.
It was one of the best.
davidk on December 23, 2012 at 10:46 AM
It’s the Cliffs Notes version of The Necronomicon. As far as the language goes, Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn.
Walter Sobchak on December 23, 2012 at 12:11 PM