GM is alive and taxpayers got ripped off
If the Treasury is able to sell the rest of the taxpayers’ GM shares at the same price that it bought them from GM, then the Obama administration will have recouped just $34 billion of the $51 billion the federal government spent on the car company. That’s a $17 billion loss.
Throw in the $14 billion the federal government lost bailing out Ally Financial, formerly known as GMAC (GM’s technically independent financing arm), and Obama’s total GM losses reach about $31 billion.
What did this get in return? Well, it didn’t get us a resurgent company, no matter what Obama campaign press releases say. As recently as 2006, GM had almost a quarter — 24 percent — of the domestic auto market. That has now fallen to about 16 percent, down from 18 percent a year ago and just barely above Ford and Toyota. At this rate, Obama could round out his second term by giving it another bailout.
It didn’t turn around America’s manufacturing sector either. Since July of this year, the U.S. economy has lost, not gained, 26,000 manufacturing jobs.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
That doesn’t include the “special” $45 billion tax loss carryover that was extended to GM, and GM only – well, not to GM but to the fake shell company that was illegally created to take on GM’s assets and leave its liabilities in the bankruptcy court, along with the secured creditors …
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on December 22, 2012 at 4:23 PM
“Union Made” /BHO
trs on December 22, 2012 at 4:23 PM
Look at the mess Obama will be inheriting when being sworn in.
ButterflyDragon on December 22, 2012 at 4:26 PM
Taxpayers got ripped off, and GM bond holders got raped.
BTW, what’s up with litigation on their behalf? Anything cooking?
petefrt on December 22, 2012 at 4:29 PM
And, worst of all, the Constitution got ripped up. Even if the GM nationalization had been financially successful and the government had made wads of cash and GM had hired a million new workers, it would still be an un-Constitutional act that wasn’t worth it, as the sanctity of contracts is the foundation of modern society and the limits of government power are the foundation of America. There is no amount of money or economic benefit that is worth throwing those away.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on December 22, 2012 at 4:32 PM
And yesterday, Drudge posted an item that said GM workers will be receiving a $7,000 bonus this year. Pretty good for a bankrupt company, eh?
honsy on December 22, 2012 at 4:41 PM
I had dearly hoped there would be successful Constitutional challenges on behalf of bond holders, and I assume something is percolating, but haven’t heard anything lately. As you suggest, this is far too serious a matter to go unchallenged.
petefrt on December 22, 2012 at 4:48 PM
Forget it. The SCOTASS refused to hear the case and let the lower court stand. That was it for the sanctity of contracts. of course, this is no surprise in a nation where “empathy” has now been officially declared a legitimate main criterion for a judge or judicial decision. It’s a sad, pathetic place this nation has come to … but that’s where we are.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on December 22, 2012 at 4:50 PM
GM isn’t really alive, it’s undead. What we have now is zombie GM.
zmdavid on December 22, 2012 at 4:53 PM
Out of curiosity I looked up the stuff Obama inherited at the beginning of his first term and then looked up what he’ll be inheriting the beginning of his second term.
January 20, 2009
Unemployment Rate 7.8%
National Debt $10.6 Trillion
Employment Participation Rate 65.7%
November 2012
Unemployment Rate 7.7%
National Debt $16.3 Trillion
Employment Participation Rate 63.6%
So, we borrowed 5.7 trillion and all we have to show for it is a .01% drop in the unemployment number (due to people leaving the work force).
Furthermore, Our civilian labor force was 234,739,000 in January 2009. With a participation rate of 65.7% that means 80,515,000 were not working.
November 2012 our civilian labor force was at 240,441,000. With a participation rate of 63.6% that means 87,520,000 were not working.
So, we have been unable to keep job growth at a level to even break even with population.
An increase of 5,702,000 in the civilian labor force, but yet the increase of those not working was 7,005,000 people.
Anyone want to bet the next president inaugurated in 2017 will be inheriting even worse numbers?
ButterflyDragon on December 22, 2012 at 4:59 PM
Bad news. Very bad.
Yep, that’s the beginning of the end for contracts and another nail in the coffin for property rights.
petefrt on December 22, 2012 at 5:14 PM
Bonuses for everyone this season. Well except for you….and you…..and you…….and those other ones.
Bmore on December 22, 2012 at 5:24 PM
If you just give President Obama another two terms beginning in 2016, he’ll spend his every waking moment on creating jobs — I promise! Debt, schmedt.
Everybody loves him, especially our former enemies, so they’ll keep buying our junk Treasury bonds — I promise! Soon EVERYBODY will be a government employee and member of a public union; 0% unemployment — you’ll see! Cost, schmost. Liberty, schmiberty.
And if Americans are too stupid to repeal the 22nd Amendment before then, at least preserve the work and expand upon the legacy provided to that point and give those two terms to the next most deserving and nearly-as-qualified public servant: Michelle.
/Obama voter
ShainS on December 22, 2012 at 5:42 PM
Actually, just a continuation of this court’s smashing of personal property rights. See Kelo.
And Ron Paul’s commentary on Kelo.
fred5678 on December 22, 2012 at 6:03 PM
More on SCOTUS and property rights from the Kelo Wiki link above:
fred5678 on December 22, 2012 at 6:21 PM
Hey, you know if those Chinese were really clever, they might see that Obama’s spending will destroy our economy, so they would enable it by buying our bonds. Cheaper than waging a war, they might think.
Nawww, that would never happen.
petefrt on December 22, 2012 at 6:50 PM
Yup, Kelo was a disaster.
The left’s assault on property rights has barely begun. Heaven help us if Obama packs the USSC and the Senate approves a few UN treaties.
petefrt on December 22, 2012 at 6:56 PM