Gaps in FBI data undercut background checks for guns
Nearly two decades after lawmakers began requiring background checks for gun buyers, significant gaps in the F.B.I.’s database of criminal and mental health records allow thousands of people to buy firearms every year who should be barred from doing so.
The database is incomplete because many states have not provided federal authorities with comprehensive records of people involuntarily committed or otherwise ruled mentally ill. Records are also spotty for several other categories of prohibited buyers, including those who have tested positive for illegal drugs or have a history of domestic violence.
While some states, including New York, have submitted more than 100,000 names of mentally ill people to the F.B.I. database, 19 — including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Maryland and Maine — have submitted fewer than 100 records and Rhode Island has submitted none, according to federal data compiled by Mayors Against Illegal Guns. That suggests that millions of names are missing from the federal database, gun control advocates and law enforcement officials say.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Wow,
A government program that doesn’t quite measure up to its intended function?
Who would have thought?
ProfShadow on December 22, 2012 at 2:08 PM
Guess this explains how all those guns got to mexico per F&F? NO back ground checks for bho/holder/big sis/etc? You would be hard pressed to say if they all were under ‘mentally ill, or crooks’ though?
L
letget on December 22, 2012 at 2:14 PM
So obviously the answer is to ban all guns //sarc
byepartisan on December 22, 2012 at 2:20 PM
Okay, maybe the NYT missed an obvious opportunity to be biased, but I don’t see red states there.
As for Rhode Island, I’d check if they legislated their state a nutcase-free state before I disparaged them.
Dusty on December 22, 2012 at 2:27 PM
The only way to solve these issues is for Congress (or the President, by executive order, if necessary) to give the FBI (and, by extension, the entire DOJ) access to all of everyone’s records everywhere, ever.
steebo77 on December 22, 2012 at 2:33 PM
This is exactly why you don’t want a federal database on mentally ill. Once they start cataloging it’s a short ride to taking over your life.
This is exactly the problem with La Pierre’s suggestion to keep a national database of those with mental illness.
All you potheads out there with your medicinal cards ever think about that. Wait until the next study links pot and psychosis and then you’re on the list.
Occam’s razor is a switchblade.
Capitalist Hog on December 22, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Have you ever been prescribed pills for something that is not entirely physical? You’re next.
Capitalist Hog on December 22, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Barry prescribed aspirin to eliminate the need for hip replacements. Does that count?
Dusty on December 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM
How long before their definition of mentally ill includes everyone who was put on rit@lin because the teacher was boring.
agmartin on December 22, 2012 at 2:50 PM
Isn’t Obamacare and those required electronic medical records gonna solve this so called problem?
meci on December 22, 2012 at 2:58 PM
Your bias is noted.
davidk on December 22, 2012 at 3:01 PM
davidk on December 22, 2012 at 3:12 PM