Is Boehner’s Speakership in trouble?
And the linchpin of the emerging conservative “oust-Boehner” strategy rests on the House rule that to be elected as speaker, a candidate must receive an “absolute majority” of all House member votes cast for individuals.
Details contained in a Congressional Research Service analysis dated Jan. 6, 2011, titled, “Speakers of the House: Elections, 1913-2011,” confirm that a concerted effort by as few as 17 House conservatives could–in fact–throw this normally routine reelection process for Boehner into turmoil.
“Members normally vote for the [speaker] candidate of their own party conference, but may vote for any individual, whether nominated or not,” states the CRS report. “To be elected, a candidate must receive an absolute majority of all the votes cast for individuals. This number may be less than a majority (which will be 218) of the full membership of the House, because of vacancies, absentees, or members voting ‘present.’ ”
In short, with Jackson having retired, as few as 17 House Republican members now can deny Boehner an “absolute majority” of the total 434 expected votes on Jan. 3, if all the Democrats back Pelosi.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No, since the question was not, “Should it be…”
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on December 21, 2012 at 1:43 PM
There HAS to be a better person we can get as soth than boehner? But you have to remember, if(I am not suggesting anything) something was to happen to bho/dear joe the soth is next in line!
I wouldn’t mind someone else if we can get a good one?
L
letget on December 21, 2012 at 1:44 PM
His speakership was in trouble during his acceptance speech.
There’s no crying in Hardball.
portlandon on December 21, 2012 at 1:45 PM
I hope so. The problem with the GOP is not ideas but the idiots we select to deliver them.
celticdefender on December 21, 2012 at 1:46 PM
I sure hope so.
wildcat72 on December 21, 2012 at 1:49 PM
Maybe making that list of dissenters and threatening to use it to punish, in the future, wasn’t such a good idea.
a capella on December 21, 2012 at 1:53 PM
We are +$16.3 Trillion dollars in debt…
… What is he doing about it?
Seven Percent Solution on December 21, 2012 at 1:57 PM
I want him to lose the speakership, just so I can watch him blubber. F-ing weenie.
Ward Cleaver on December 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM
I don’t know. Rewarding failure has worked out so well for the Dems.
Left Coast Right Mind on December 21, 2012 at 1:59 PM
When a speaker has to actively work to ostracize an entire segment of his party (i.e. Conservatives) … then yes – he’s in trouble. He’s in trouble like the Syrian Government is in trouble now.
HondaV65 on December 21, 2012 at 2:00 PM
Hey! Lay off!! Dude cut
$150 Billion…$60 BILLION…$39 BILLION… 500 million from last years budget – that’s like shutting down government for like … 10 miliseconds.HondaV65 on December 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM
A cartoon rabbit would be better. At least Bugs has some BALLS.
dogsoldier on December 21, 2012 at 2:09 PM
God I hope so. Hate the GOPe with a red hot passion that until the last 4 years was only reserved for the dems.
unseen on December 21, 2012 at 2:14 PM
One can hope a change is forthcoming…
Gohawgs on December 21, 2012 at 2:16 PM
May they all go to Hades.
Schadenfreude on December 21, 2012 at 2:17 PM
Hastert the Second doing virtually nothing for a full two years with the tremendous 2010 momentum the Tea Party and Sarah Palin had gifted him… has consequences.
viking01 on December 21, 2012 at 2:17 PM
Now that’s Change I Can Believe In.
ProfShadow on December 21, 2012 at 2:20 PM
…the GOP is in trouble.
equanimous on December 21, 2012 at 2:21 PM
Well if standing with your feet about 1/2 over the cliff and that with your back turned to Obama and trusting him not to give you a little nudge,,,,, well if a speaker of the house like that were not in troulbe something sure as hell sould be seen as wrong ……
APACHEWHOKNOWS on December 21, 2012 at 2:23 PM
Okay, and who would be the replacement? You kill the king, you better have something with which to replace him.
Sekhmet on December 21, 2012 at 2:26 PM
Maybe. Boehner really PO’ed those conservatives when he removed them from their committees and American Majority Action (AMA) is launching a #FireBoehner campaign. Ron Meyer, press secretary for AMA, said that the group likes Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the outgoing chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee, to replace Boehner, though he noted that “there aren’t enough votes to elect someone new — yet.” They think it’s doable. We’ll see.
lynncgb on December 21, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Nobody likes it when leaders do purges of their own party. The speaker has wasted enough of the GOP’s politcal capital on rainbows and unicorns farts that have done nothing but ensured that Obama has gotten more powerful.
unseen on December 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM
Trouble? Deep trouble, I hope.
Solid patriot, good man, lousy leader.
petefrt on December 21, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Agreed.
Panther on December 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM
Jordan would be a great choice.
topdawg on December 21, 2012 at 4:03 PM