Why atheist scientists bring their children to church
Looked at another way, contrary to popular expectation, atheist scientists show a proclivity to join a religious community when raising children. Unlike many atheists who feel isolated in a region of heavy religiosity, scientists have ready access to a community of fellow, morally minded atheists, and yet choose to raise their children in a religious community. Several reasons account for this.
First, scientists feel that having a scientific mindset means being able to make choices for oneself. Even if the scientist parent does not believe in God, this does not mean that the parent should impose that decision on his or her children—the children should think for themselves. Many scientists interviewed explicitly stated that they did not want to indoctrinate their children into atheism and so exposed their children to a diversity of religious communities.
Second – the most dominant reason – many of the scientists had a religious spouse who had a strong influence on how to raise their children. While this naturally required some negotiation, most of the scientists came from religious upbringings themselves and did not oppose a religious upbringing for their children.
In many circumstances they favored a religious upbringing because, third, they believed it would provide children with moral orientation.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
A quid each way.
OldEnglish on December 20, 2012 at 10:23 PM
Third, they’re hypocrites?
John the Libertarian on December 20, 2012 at 10:24 PM
Anyone else have a Bad Feeling about where this thread will go?
malclave on December 20, 2012 at 10:25 PM
no one wants u to have a good feeling
Mormontheman on December 20, 2012 at 10:27 PM
what-What-WHAT???
Oh, okay.
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on December 20, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Because Jesus loves the little children?
steebo77 on December 20, 2012 at 10:32 PM
Good Lt about to turn into Bad Lt.
The Count on December 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM
My mother’s not an atheist, but as an excommunicated Jehovah’s Witness she had no love for organized religion either, and she chose to send me and my brother to Catholic school for the very reason given here: to give us the choice; to expose us to a religious lifestyle knowing that if it was for us we’d continue in it. Even though I’m now an atheist, I would probably do the same.
ernesto on December 20, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Because even people who urinate all over the 10 Commandments when they’re independent adults recognize the good that faith in a higher, saving power can do for their children.
MelonCollie on December 20, 2012 at 10:44 PM
Hitchens daughter’s were baptized Catholic because of his wife.
…and he used to hold an annual Christmas Party…
budfox on December 20, 2012 at 10:48 PM
Pascal’s Wager?
Knott Buyinit on December 20, 2012 at 10:49 PM
Interesting theory, I would bet it’s a viable one. A true parent might not give a fart about their own eternal future, but the mental image of Bobby burning in hellfire might motivate them to send him to the church – maybe the exact same church they themselves abandoned.
MelonCollie on December 20, 2012 at 10:54 PM
Yep. Or like lifelong atheist W.C. Fields on his deathbed scouring the bible: “Looking for loopholes.”
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on December 20, 2012 at 10:56 PM
I’m an theist and I still enjoy attending church and getting to know the people there. Church attendance and enjoying religious holidays with friends hasn’t compromised my atheism at all… in fact many of the sermons hymn lyrics remind me why I am atheist but I enjoy the music, songs, and sense of community. I am happy to pay taxes for my UK income knowing that some of the money goes to support the CofE. I want the architecture and libraries maintained for future generations. For all the differences I have with religious people I find there is much that I have in common. I value and respect the good work that religions do for those less fortunate. It’s not that tricky for me to admire those things while rejecting the far fetched stuff of religion and the sectarianism of some of its followers.
lexhamfox on December 20, 2012 at 11:07 PM
That’s sad beyond words.
I hope he went through the front door before he perished looking for non-existent side gates.
MelonCollie on December 20, 2012 at 11:09 PM
It’s also a superior education to what passes for public education; it’s why my parents (with assistance from grandparents) sent my sisters and me to prep school.
rbj on December 20, 2012 at 11:14 PM
I hope he found whatever brought him peace at the end. I think ‘ol W.C. was just trying to be amusing, as always. Great wit Oscar Wilde’s famous deathbed words were funnier: “Either that wallpaper goes, or I do.”
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on December 20, 2012 at 11:15 PM
CYA
CW on December 20, 2012 at 11:21 PM
Possibly. But seeing as how he lived most of his life, I get the feeling he was trying to cover up grim foreboding with a joke.
I just hope I’m wrong.
MelonCollie on December 20, 2012 at 11:22 PM
Missed this one, and am a bit mystified too. If someone is an atheist, the image of his/her child burning in hellfire is just inconceivable because there is flat zero belief that there is a heaven or hell in the first place. It isn’t “not caring” (atheists love their children too), it’s simply not believing in the supernatural.
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on December 20, 2012 at 11:33 PM
This
DarkCurrent on December 21, 2012 at 1:01 AM
I’m borderline atheist (call me “undecided”), but I feel a judeo-christian upbringing is both good for society as a whole, as well as the individual. Just because I do not have faith doesn’t mean I think others who do are wrong/ bad/ simpletons– I simply can’t bridge the gap in my own mind. So, my kids attend Catholic schools, where I am a regular volunteer & every Sunday Mass attendee. The kids are only now coming to an age where they question why I don’t take communion– I haven’t really had a good answer, but will have to come up with one soon. I hope they are able to live a faith-filled life; we’ll see.
Security Mom on December 21, 2012 at 1:52 AM
Atheism has to rely on moral capital borrowed from Religion.
tommyboy on December 21, 2012 at 6:06 AM
BREAKING: Real Life Atheists Not Like A-Hole Internet Atheists
(Disclosure: I am not an atheist.)
WeekendAtBernankes on December 21, 2012 at 7:04 AM
Those 2 words ‘moral orientation’ says it all.
tommy71 on December 21, 2012 at 7:06 AM
moral orientation.
The one thing that religion has in spades, in a higher density than anywhere else, is good morals and a way to teach them effectively.
astonerii on December 21, 2012 at 8:49 AM
I think that most of the reasons given are pretty close.
Old Country Boy on December 21, 2012 at 9:06 AM
My wife and I are objectivists, and will be bring our 7 & 10 year old boys to church for the first time this Sunday. Their mom’s reuniting with the missionaries that rescued her from Cambodia after the war. She s going to be speaking, thanking them and telling her story, including how she just returned from Operation Hope there as nurse practitioner. Funny, the new paster there on learning of her return emailed and asked her to make it a full sermon on how God took her from Cambodia and how she was serving God today. She delicately explained things, and he was cool. Said she was welcome to speak irrespective of ideology. I like Christians.
elfman on December 21, 2012 at 9:08 AM
This is silly. If you truly believe in something, then won’t you pass it on as truth to your children? Otherwise I have to ask if you let the kids discover that fire burns, gravity makes you fall from buildings, and you can’t breathe through a plastic bag all on their own, too?
GWB on December 21, 2012 at 9:58 AM
the only moral teaching you need is the golden rule. no need for religion and fairy tales to teach that. i get the “morality” of the teachings of jesus but again he pretty much said to be good to people, golden rule type stuff. the jeffersonian bible is a good tool.
but to say religion and the bible and god to be beacons of morality, well, that is a joke. i could go on and on about the shortcomings of the morality of god and the bible, but just to know that it endorses slavery should be all that you need to hear to be appalled.
kastor on December 21, 2012 at 10:07 AM
Then morality would be subjective to whim. If Mary feels suicidal, murders committed by her are sanctioned. If Bob feels like getting raped, etc…
So the alternatives are 1) letting societies vote on the fundamental “golden rules” (meaning rights are a product of the state), 2) believing that religions’ definition of God dictates the fundamental rules or 3) having an ideology like Objectivism that claims that an objective morality is apparent from reason and observation of the natural world.
elfman on December 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM