The Democratic drive to make voting mandatory
Because the likelihood of any individual’s vote mattering is infinitesimal and because the effort required to be an informed voter can be substantial, ignorance and abstention are rational, unless voting is cathartic or otherwise satisfying. A small voting requirement such as registration, which calls for the individual voter’s initiative, acts to filter potential voters with the weakest motivations. They are apt to invest minimal effort in civic competence. As indifferent or reluctant voters are nagged to the polls — or someday prodded there by a monetary penalty for nonvoting — the caliber of the electorate must decline.
It has been said that for every complex problem there is a solution that is clear, simple and wrong. Washington soon may seek a complex “solution” — preemption of states’ responsibilities; federal micromanagement of elections; eventual coercion of lackadaisical citizens — to the non-problem of people choosing not to vote.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Oh sure….that will happen.
NeoKong on December 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM
This is unconstitutional… Discuss.
Illinidiva on December 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM
Democracy has turned into a religion… making voting mandatory is akin to forcing atheists to eat the bread and the wine.
ninjapirate on December 20, 2012 at 7:48 PM
The problem with forcing people to vote is that in a representative democracy the people only get to pick the bit players… we live in a thetreocracy… forcing everyone to vote is to force everyone to believe the play is real.
This is why the right needs more despair… why the GOP needs to die… and why conservatives should quit. The only way to win is for the play to end.
Start disbelieving.
ninjapirate on December 20, 2012 at 7:53 PM
Mandatory voting? One giant leap for returning the state to the glory days of Stalin.
petefrt on December 20, 2012 at 7:55 PM
freedom and liberty are foreign concepts to the proggtards
newrouter on December 20, 2012 at 8:02 PM
Soon after to be followed by a dude wielding an AK standing behind you to make sure you vote correctly.
Seriously? Force me to vote and I’m going to write-in the nastiest shiite I learned from my Navy days, and brother let me tell you, I learned from experts.
Bishop on December 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM
If I were in charge I’d go the other way. I’d make it so you would have to pass the same test we give to prospective new citizens as well as proving you understand the Laffer Curve/basic econ. 101 before you got the right to vote. Either that, or go all Starship Trooper (the book, not the awful movie. That is, only honorably discharged vets get to vote.
Boogeyman on December 20, 2012 at 8:09 PM
In the end, for the ‘big brains’ among the progs the motto will be, “If it is not proscribed, it is forbidden!”
Boogeyman on December 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM
Mandatory voting? Better idea: Only taxpayers allowed to vote.
petefrt on December 20, 2012 at 8:15 PM
It already is mandatory in all Chicago cemeteries ever since Joe Kennedy’s Mafia buddies gave the go-ahead in 1960.
viking01 on December 20, 2012 at 8:16 PM
Only veterans allowed to be pols, only veterans allowed to vote.
Bishop on December 20, 2012 at 8:17 PM
Very close. In the Soviet Union, every vote was essentially a no confidence vote. People couldn’t vote “for” a candidate they wanted; they could only vote “against” whomever the Party nominated.
In America, we have four state-licensed TV networks; in russia, they had two. We have two political parties to choose from; they had four.
So I suppose an optimist would be glad America is twice as good as a totalitarianism. But I am not an optimist.
logis on December 20, 2012 at 8:19 PM
Only people who contribute to society should be allowed to vote. That would include both soldiers and net taxpayers.
If America once again became a democratic nation, the self-proclaimed “Democratic” Party would disappear the very next election cycle. And most incumbent officials of the GOP would be out of office not long after.
logis on December 20, 2012 at 8:27 PM
Previous year’s W2 (after elimination of the EITC) or current SS statement should be the requirement. That, or you need to qualify to vote with a basic civics test. Preferably the former plan. If there were a federal income tax when the Constitution was ratified, there’s no way they would have allowed non-taxpayers to vote.
The Count on December 20, 2012 at 8:39 PM
They’re going full tyrant on us.
Dusty on December 20, 2012 at 8:46 PM
Rats’ drive to make all bad things European…it’s so, well, so ‘egalitarian’ and ‘enlightening’, rubes.
Schadenfreude on December 20, 2012 at 8:54 PM
Are these the same Democrats who say the voter IDs are an unconstitutional burden on citizens, disproportionately oppressing the poor and minorities? How would that logic not then extend to mandatory voting (taking into account transportation costs, time away from work, etc.)?
steebo77 on December 20, 2012 at 9:10 PM
Sure, and along with insurance exchanges and carbon credit exchanges they can set up voter registration exchanges.
The message is becoming clear. If you want to get rich in this country, become one of the Democratic Party’s toadies and get your piece of the pie.
Dr. ZhivBlago on December 20, 2012 at 9:13 PM
Me neither.
petefrt on December 20, 2012 at 9:47 PM
Why not?
The can tell us what not to buy, what we have to buy, we’re taxed well above even the most oppressed medieval serf had to provide their masters, they can take our property and give it to someone else.
Why not go full fascist?
Rebar on December 20, 2012 at 9:55 PM
That hasn’t stopped the Ojesus junta from leaning forward, in other words, trampling the Constitution, yet.
hillbillyjim on December 20, 2012 at 9:56 PM
It doesn’t matter. It’s the people (or machines) counting the votes that make the difference.
The Rogue Tomato on December 20, 2012 at 10:08 PM