<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/12/19/no-banning-ammunition-probably-isnt-constitutional-either/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 06:32:35 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>No, banning ammunition probably isn't constitutional either</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Others are suggesting a de-facto ban, accomplished either through a huge tax, or a ban on ammunition.  Oh, I&amp;#8217;ve also seen calls to limit the amount of ammunition people can buy, but I don&amp;#8217;t think those people have thought this through.  For starters, the number of bullets used by a typical rampage shooter is about what a target shooter or hunter might go through in an afternoon or two of range practice.  And most gun homicides are not rampage shootings; they have one or two victims, and a correspondingly small number of cartridges expended.  Moreover, even a very strict per-purchase limit would permit people to accumulate ammunition over time.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:20:57 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Allahpundit]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/2012/12/19/no-banning-ammunition-probably-isnt-constitutional-either-n280621</link></item></channel></rss>