Independent report rips State Dep’t for Benghazi security failures
An independent inquiry into the attack on the United States diplomatic mission in Libya that killed four Americans on Sept. 11 sharply criticizes the State Department for a lack of seasoned security personnel and relying on untested local militias to safeguard the compound, Congressional and State Department officials said Tuesday night.
The investigation into the attacks on the diplomatic mission and C.I.A. annex that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others also faulted State Department officials in Washington for ignoring requests from officials at the American Embassy in Tripoli for more guards and safety upgrades to the diplomatic mission.
The panel also blamed the State Department for waiting for specific warnings of imminent attacks to act rather than adapting security procedures and protocols to a deteriorating security environment. By this spring, Benghazi, a hotbed of militant activity in eastern Libya, had experienced a string of assassinations and attacks, including one on a British envoy’s motorcade.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Where’s Hillary?
UltimateBob on December 18, 2012 at 10:11 PM
What did Hillary forget, and when did she forget it?
Christien on December 18, 2012 at 10:13 PM
She fall down go boom at just right time. This shit aint funny no more.
The press is absolutely traitorous in how they are not doing their job and the republicans are worthless ck….ers as well. Was that too nice? I’m mad.
arnold ziffel on December 18, 2012 at 10:16 PM
Who ordered the stand down?
JPeterman on December 18, 2012 at 10:16 PM
Funny how the smartest woman in the world has memory and veracity issues going waaay back.
arnold ziffel on December 18, 2012 at 10:19 PM
I thought Hillary’s “not tonight, I have a headache” routine was only supposed to work on Bill.
Stu Gotts on December 18, 2012 at 10:22 PM
Ben E. King or the Police. Or was that John Boehner?
arnold ziffel on December 18, 2012 at 10:22 PM
When contacted for her reaction to the report, Secretary Clinton said, “Benghazi? What’s a Benghazi? I don’t remember ever meeting anyone named Benghazi. You see, last week I fell and bumped my head.”
petefrt on December 18, 2012 at 10:23 PM
I find it peculiar the NYT would file this story under “Politics”.
heretic on December 18, 2012 at 10:23 PM
No that was an upskirt that looks like a forbidden glacier.
arnold ziffel on December 18, 2012 at 10:24 PM
She fall down go boom at just right time. Crackin’ me up.
petefrt on December 18, 2012 at 10:25 PM
I just got on twitter today. Let me in.
JPeterman on December 18, 2012 at 10:30 PM
Too bad Hillary got too sick to testify…no, really, she’s sick, and anyone who thinks different is a member of the vast right-wing conspiracy and evil, too.
blue13326 on December 18, 2012 at 10:32 PM
I’m following you now, partner.
petefrt on December 18, 2012 at 10:35 PM
“Stomach virus” dehydrated her sooo much that she she fell and struck her noggin causing a concussion and she no testify before congress. Yet NFL guys can play within ten days.
arnold ziffel on December 18, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Whos Ben Ghazi? Just sayin his name over and over again ain’t gonna make him magically appear. Ben Affleck on the other hand, is being talked up as a Kerry replacement. Now that is funny.
tommy71 on December 18, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Oh boy, I got my first follower! Thanks for that!
JPeterman on December 18, 2012 at 10:41 PM
Now, after you become famous, I can say, “I knew him when…”
petefrt on December 18, 2012 at 10:46 PM
Where’s Hillary? I’ll tell ya where I think Hillary is. I think she had a real personal friendship with Chris Stevens and that she has been devastated by what happened on HER WATCH in Benghazi. I think she is drinking herself silly because of it and that people are trying to hide that with “stomach virus” and “concussion malarkey.
Connie on December 18, 2012 at 10:47 PM
Personal friendship, of the Biblical variety? Interesting idea, but what interest would Stevens have with a beat up old cougar?
petefrt on December 18, 2012 at 10:57 PM
Didn’t she have one with Vince foster also and he wound up at MacArthur Park? Stay away from her.
arnold ziffel on December 18, 2012 at 11:02 PM
So what sort of consequences are likely to result from this independent report? Will Charlene Lamb lose her job, or will she be allowed to retire with full benefits? If I had my way, I’d send the hag to Benghazi, and deny her requests for additional security. That woman should be in jail.
Hill60 on December 18, 2012 at 11:09 PM
Fort Marcy Park, and please, it’s still dinner time in some areas of the U.S.
Left Coast Right Mind on December 18, 2012 at 11:09 PM
Hillary is as dumb as Obama at 3:00a.m.
The cover up persists.
Obama and Hillary have blood on their hands.
Schadenfreude on December 18, 2012 at 11:30 PM
Who’s investigating the White House..?
d1carter on December 18, 2012 at 11:48 PM
What did Hillary forget, and when did she forget it?
Christien on December 18, 2012 at 10:13 PM
Christien:You Rang(sarc):)
==========================
Victoria Nuland
Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
December 18, 2012
*****************
Index for Today’s Briefing
LIBYA
Status of ARB
Current Presence in Libya
DEPARTMENT
Secretary Clinton’s Health
**********************************
Press Relations » Daily Press Briefings » 2012 » December » Daily Press Briefing – December 18, 2012
Victoria Nuland
Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
December 18, 2012
Share on facebookShare on google_plusone
Share
Index for Today’s Briefing
LIBYA
Status of ARB
Current Presence in Libya
DEPARTMENT
Secretary Clinton’s Health
SYRIA
Chemical Weapons
Yarmouk Camp Killings / Refugees
Consular Services to U.S. Citizen / Missing U.S. Citizens
SYRIA/TURKEY
Nonlethal Assistance
Support Political Opposition
ISRAEL/PALESTINIANS
Settlements / Actions on the Ground
IRAQ
President of Iraq Jalal Talabani
PAKISTAN
Condemn Attacks of Healthcare Workers
INDIA
India and ASEAN Meeting / Free Trade Agreement
CONGO
Acquittal of Ngudjolo Chui
RWANDA
M23 Issues / Kampala Peace Process
LAOS
Disappearance of Mr. Sombath Somphone
TRANSCRIPT:
1:13 p.m. EST
MS. NULAND: All right, everybody. Happy Tuesday. Is it only Tuesday? I think it’s only Tuesday. I have nothing at the top. Let’s go to what’s on your minds.
QUESTION: Just, again, the logistics on the ARB. Has it been sent up to the Hill? I heard just a little while ago that it hadn’t. If it hasn’t, when exactly is it going to go up? Are you going to do it at like 10 o’clock tonight to try and minimize the likelihood of it leaking?
MS. NULAND: Well, as we laid out yesterday, the classified version of the ARB report is going to go up to the Hill later this afternoon so that members and staff of relevant committees will have a chance to look at it in advance of the classified briefings that Ambassador Pickering and Admiral Mullen will give tomorrow. Also to say that it will be covered by a letter from the Secretary.
QUESTION: Does that mean that the unclassified bit doesn’t go up until the following day, or does it all go as one thing and they get the whole report and they can sort of look at it?
MS. NULAND: Today they’re going to get the classified report covered by the Secretary’s letter. I think you know that in the context of this whole ARB process, the Secretary has wanted to be as transparent as possible not only with the Hill, but also with all of you, with the fourth estate, with the American public. So in that context, she has asked the ARB to do its utmost to make a good portion of it unclassified while protecting national security, obviously. So that unclassified portion is being worked now. We anticipate being able to make that available no later than tomorrow morning.
QUESTION: So could it be today?
QUESTION: Oh, it could be today?
MS. NULAND: Again, no later than tomorrow morning, could be earlier, but certainly no later than tomorrow morning.
QUESTION: And how will it be delivered?
QUESTION: Can – is it possible to get a little bit of a heads up if it’s going to come today? If it is – if it becomes clear that it won’t be –
QUESTION: Tomorrow?
QUESTION: — today, could someone let us know?
MS. NULAND: We should give you a 20-minute warning, watch the website, or –
QUESTION: So we can know –
QUESTION: If at 5:30 it becomes clear that they can’t scrub everything and it’s not going to come today, can you –
MS. NULAND: Yeah. We’ll do what we can to work with you. We understand everybody’s got a job to do.
QUESTION: When you said the website, is it going to be put up on the State Department website?
MS. NULAND: We’ll make it available on the website. And at that time, we’ll also make the Secretary’s letter – covering letter available as well. Okay?
QUESTION: And can you give us some specifics, perhaps, just in advance of how long is the report, how many pages?
MS. NULAND: I don’t have any specifics for you at this moment, Jo.
QUESTION: You can’t – can you tell us anything about the procedures, how the ARB actually worked, the number of people they interviewed, the number of documents they reviewed?
MS. NULAND: I don’t have any back story on any of that for you, Jo. I’m sure that that’ll be one of the subjects that’ll be discussed on the Hill, and we’ll have more to say in coming days on all of that.
QUESTION: And what are plans for Ambassador Pickering or Mike – Admiral Mullen to brief the press?
MS. NULAND: That is also still being worked out. Their main focus, as you can imagine, today is preparing for the briefings that they’re going to be giving tomorrow. So that’s what they are focused on. As you know, they did ask us to collect the various press requests, which is why we established that website for you all to put your requests in, but I don’t have any clarity yet on what their press plans are. I will get back to you on that as soon as I possibly can.
QUESTION: Can you also – yesterday I asked whether there was any update on the status of the Libyan authorities’ own investigation, and you said you would try to get back to us with that.
MS. NULAND: Ah, I thought you were asking, Jo, about our intention to brief the Libyans on the ARB. Were you asking about the update on the investigation, on the FBI?
QUESTION: No, there was two parts of the question, one of which you answered, which was whether you were going to give the – and you said you would give them the unclassified part of the investigation, but there was also – I also was wondering if you could update us on the status of the Libyan authorities’ own investigation into this incident.
MS. NULAND: Well, with regard to the investigation, that’s, as you know, fully in the hands of the FBI now. So they will be responsible for giving whatever press information they feel comfortable with. But my understanding is that they don’t intend to do any briefing on the status of the investigation, their work with the Libyans, until they’re completed, which they are not yet. With regard to the ARB and the Libyans, my understanding today is that our charge d’affaires there, Ambassador Larry Pope, will have access to the report, and he will be working with the Libyans on any necessary follow-up.
QUESTION: Victoria.
MS. NULAND: Yeah.
QUESTION: Could you update us on the status of the diplomatic presence – American diplomatic presence in Libya? You just mentioned the charge d’affaires. Is it just in Tripoli or is it in other places? Is there some in Benghazi or not?
MS. NULAND: Our only permanent presence in Libya at the moment is in Tripoli. They do travel as necessary to stay in touch with other parts of the country. It is still relatively streamlined there as we continue to work on the various security issues with the Libyans. You know that I never talk about numbers. We just don’t do that.
QUESTION: Okay. Are the Americans hunkered down, or are they able to work with civil society groups and other groups to provide the kind of guidance and democracy and rule of law and all that stuff that you –
MS. NULAND: No, they are able to interact with a lot of Libyans, both in person and on the phone and in other ways. So I don’t think from that perspective, in terms of their ability to get a sense of what’s going on in the country, we’re constrained, but we are constrained by numbers at the moment because of security.
Margaret.
QUESTION: Toria, just a clarification. You said the classified report goes to the Hill tomorrow ahead of the testimony.
QUESTION: Today.
QUESTION: Or excuse me, today, ahead of tomorrow’s testimony. For other committees who aren’t going to be in that room, when will they get access? The same time the press does to the unclassified portions I would assume?
MS. NULAND: In terms of the classified ARB, it’s going up to Senate and House assigned reading rooms, like we always do with classified information. Members and staff of our committees and other committees of jurisdiction will be granted access to it. With regard to the unclassified report, obviously that’ll be available to everybody when it’s released.
QUESTION: You mentioned yesterday that there’s a possibility or potential that leadership could be briefed separately. Is that still being considered, or has that been firmed up?
MS. NULAND: Again, my understanding is that, in terms of the classified report going up today, leadership will also have access to it. I don’t have anything on a separate briefing for leadership beyond the briefings that will be given in classified session tomorrow to SFRC and HFAC.
Moving on? Can we move on?
QUESTION: On that note, are there yet any plans in motion for reopening a consulate in Benghazi as yet?
MS. NULAND: We don’t have any plans at the moment.
QUESTION: Sorry. Just kind of hesitate to ask this, but do you care to have – offer any response to your former colleague John Bolton, who suggested that the Secretary is suffering from, quote/unquote, “diplomatic illness,” suggesting that she is not, in fact, under the weather –
QUESTION: And the New York Post.
QUESTION: — or ill, and that she is faking an illness to – in order not to show up. I don’t – not looking for you to say what you have said in the past, which is that the Secretary is – wants to be open and has said that she will go up in January. What I’m interested in is a reaction specifically to your former colleague, Mr. Bolton’s comment.
MS. NULAND: Completely untrue. We’ve been very clear from the beginning that she had a stomach virus, an ugly stomach virus. She got very dehydrated, she fainted, it was later discovered she had sustained a concussion. On doctor’s orders, she is working at home this week. That’s all we’ve got going on.
QUESTION: This is a guy you used to work with. Can you offer any explanation as to why this man, a former colleague of yours, worked in this building, would say such a thing?
MS. NULAND: I can’t speak to his personal motivation. I can assure you he’s not privy to any inside information.
QUESTION: Well, there are – I mean, there are several of these type of reports that are making these outrageous charges, so –
MS. NULAND: It’s really unfortunate that in times like this, people make wild speculation based on no information. As I said yesterday, and I’ll say it again today, she’s on the mend, she’s going to be absolutely fine. She is working at home. As you know, she got the ARB report yesterday. She read through it yesterday. She’s been working on the letter that will go with it to the Hill. She’s been on the phone and in email contact with senior staff. She’s been working on other issues, Syria, the DPRK today. So these are people who don’t know what they’re talking about.
QUESTION: Well, how does that – I mean, is she working – is she doing too much work against the advice of her doctors? Because when the doctors put out the statement on, I believe it was Saturday, they said that they urged her not to have any kind of strenuous work. I don’t think they meant physical; I think they meant the – when you have a brain injury of that type of nature, that some sustained rest would be required.
MS. NULAND: Well, her doctors and all the people close to her are trying to encourage her to take the time that she needs to get completely well.
QUESTION: Sorry, what else did you say she was – D.P.R.K., so North Korea – what else?
MS. NULAND: D.P.R.K., working on her letter that covers this report, et cetera, and other issues of interest.
QUESTION: Can you be more specific about what she did on Korea? Was it a phone call? Was it –
MS. NULAND: Well, she’s obviously keeping track of the conversations that we’re having in New York and elsewhere about a response, but I’m not going to get into details; the normal work that she does.
QUESTION: How did the Secretary receive the report? Did she get it in person? Was there a briefing attached to that? And can you describe for us, in general terms, what her reaction was? Satisfied, thought it took too long, didn’t take enough time, whatever? I mean, any sort of general characterization of it?
MS. NULAND: The physical report was couriered to her at the house along with the regular classified pouch that goes to her as appropriate. I’m not going to get into her reaction. I think you’ll get a sense of her reaction and the Department’s reaction when you see the letter that she’s covered the report with and when you hear the testimony of Deputy Secretary Burns and Deputy Secretary Nides. Just to remind that they are standing in for her, so the –
QUESTION: Sure.
MS. NULAND: — testimony that they give on Thursday will very much reflect her view and how we should go forward from this report and how we should learn its lessons.
QUESTION: Would you consider releasing that letter at the same time it goes up instead of later on? That would help greatly frame that very question today.
MS. NULAND: Well, I’ll certainly convey to folks your interest in that. The current plan is to release it when we release the unclassified so it’s a package, so it’s not sitting out there in isolation from the report itself and –
QUESTION: Would the letter be – would the letter itself contain classified information or would it be –
MS. NULAND: The letter’s unclassified.
QUESTION: Okay.
MS. NULAND: Okay.
QUESTION: Toria –
QUESTION: Where is her current (inaudible)? In New York or in Washington? Where is she actually?
QUESTION: Which couriers (inaudible)? (Laughter.)
MS. NULAND: And how many pillows are there and all that kind of stuff? I haven’t –
QUESTION: When did she receive this? Can you say when she received the report, though?
MS. NULAND: Yesterday morning. Yesterday morning. I think I said that yesterday.
Said.
QUESTION: My question to you is that although it is Mr. John Bolton that made this accusation, and he’s been known to make such accusations in the past, they do gain a certain traction and a lot of noise on a certain network. Are you concerned that they may create a lot more noise than you like?
MS. NULAND: That’s why we’re trying to be absolutely clear what’s going on, why we put out such a full statement on Saturday of exactly what was going on, because people speculate wildly. We understand the culture and we just want to be clear.
QUESTION: Was there reporting that she – the Secretary had to be put onto an IV; correct?
MS. NULAND: I am not going to get into the details beyond saying that she’s on the mend. It’s a very good try.
Can we move on to some foreign policy? Is that possible? Said.
QUESTION: Hold on, wait a second.
MS. NULAND: Yeah.
QUESTION: This is foreign policy.
MS. NULAND: Whether she’s had an IV or not is foreign policy?
QUESTION: No, no, the entire Libya investigation is foreign policy.
MS. NULAND: Yeah. Anything else here?
QUESTION: Can we –
MS. NULAND: Said.
QUESTION: — go to Syria?
(More….)
============
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2012/12/202226.htm
VIDEO:
http://video.state.gov/en/video/2043962186001
canopfor on December 18, 2012 at 11:51 PM
Oh boy………………
John Bolton: Hillary Clinton Has A “Diplomatic Illness”
Dec 18 2012
***********
VIDEO
======
FMR. U.N. AMBASSADOR JOHN BOLTON:
I think that she is going to have to testify at some point and, you know, every foreign service officer in every foreign ministry in the world knows the phrase that I’m about to use. When you don’t want to go to a meeting or a conference or an event, you have a ‘diplomatic illness.’ And this is a diplomatic illness to beat the band. I certainly hope it’s nothing serious, but this was revealed in a way that I think that was not transparent, and I think there is an obligation here, especially if Secretary Clinton decides to run for president, to indicate what happened. She may beat testifying this week, but she’s not going to escape it forever.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/12/18/john_bolton_hillary_clinton_has_a_diplomatic_illness.html
canopfor on December 19, 2012 at 12:06 AM
Reuters Top News @Reuters
Inquiry harshly criticizes U.S. State Department over Benghazi attack http://reut.rs/U7wIwQ
=============================
Reuters Top News @Reuters
U.S. report on Benghazi finds “grossly inadequate” security, systemic failure http://reut.rs/U7ypu9
https://twitter.com/Reuters
canopfor on December 19, 2012 at 12:18 AM
Not Sure,I think I have the ARB Benghazi Report!
Due out Wednesday Morning!!!
============================
ARB Report:
UNCLASSIFIED
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
– George Santayana, Reason in Common Sense (1905)
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Diplomatic and Antiterrorism Act of 1986, 22 U.S.C. § 4831 et seq., (the “Act”), Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton convened an Accountability Review Board (ARB) for Benghazi to examine the facts and circumstances surrounding the September 11-12, 2012, killings of four U.S. government personnel, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, John Christopher Stevens, in Benghazi, Libya. A series of attacks on September 11-12, 2012 involving arson, small-arms and machine-gun fire, and use of rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), grenades and mortars, focused on two U.S. facilities in Benghazi, as well as U.S. personnel en route between the two facilities. In addition, the attacks severely wounded two U.S. personnel, injured three Libyan contract guards and resulted in the destruction and abandonment of both facilities – the U.S. Special Mission compound (SMC) and Annex.
Four Board members were selected by the Secretary of State and one member from the intelligence community (IC) was selected by the Director for National Intelligence. Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering served as Chairman, with Admiral Michael Mullen as Vice Chairman. Additional members were Catherine Bertini, Richard Shinnick, and Hugh Turner, who represented the IC.
The criminal investigation of the September 11-12, 2012, Benghazi attacks, for which the statutory responsibility rests with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), was still underway at the time of this report. The Board enjoyed excellent cooperation with the Department of Justice and FBI throughout preparation of this report. The key questions surrounding the identity, actions and motivations of the perpetrators remain to be determined by the ongoing criminal investigation.
As called for by the Act, this report examines: whether the attacks were security related; whether security systems and procedures were adequate and implemented properly; the impact of intelligence and information availability; whether any other facts or circumstances in these cases may be relevant to appropriate security management of U.S. missions worldwide; and, finally, whether any U.S. government employee or contractor, as defined by the Act, breached her or his duty.
(38 Pages More….)
=====================
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf
canopfor on December 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM
canopfor on December 19, 2012 at 12:40 AM
Also known as “calling in sick.”
This administration is such a joke.
UltimateBob on December 19, 2012 at 12:44 AM
Although she was not hospitalized for her concussion, her doctors recommend that in the future she wear a helmet at all times when standing.
petefrt on December 19, 2012 at 6:19 AM
We can only hope that her condition does not deteriorate into lead poisoning. So many Party officials succumbed to that dread condition during the glory days of Stalin.
petefrt on December 19, 2012 at 6:26 AM