Gun-control legislation: The difference between 1994 and today
Emanuel, who led the Democrats’ successful effort to retake the House in 2006, gained an appreciation for how skittish critical swing state members were on the gun issue and steered clear of the matter. When he joined the Obama White House as chief of staff, he blew a gasket, according to an account in the book “Kill or Capture,” when Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. suggested the administration would push to reinstate the assault-weapons ban. (Emanuel’s office said the mayor had a 20-year record of standing up to the National Rifle Association and fighting to get assault weapons off America’s streets.)
And Schumer, the great champion of the assault weapons ban in the House, become remarkably less vocal about it after winning election to the Senate and eventually leading his party to a majority in that chamber. (Schumer’s office insisted that the senator has picked his spots, whipping up votes against a bill that would have gutted laws criminalizing concealed weapons, fending off NRA-backed bills that would have made it easier for mentally ill veterans to get guns and authoring a gun-control measure that strengthened background checks after the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting.)
Yassky acknowledged that the NRA exercised real political muscle through its ability to trigger a flood of member phone calls to targeted congressmen who supported gun control measures. And, he adds, some elected officials did lose their seats in part because of the passage of the assault weapons ban, most notably Brooks, who sponsored the larger bill but opposed the ban. But he pointed out that plenty of members from pro-gun districts who supported the ban survived and that gun control was a popular issue for no less a political animal than Clinton to run ads in support of the issue in his 1996 reelection victory against Sen. Robert J. Dole. In 2000, Yassky helped write the gun-control portion of Al Gore’s platform, which called for a national gun license and registration framework — akin to driver’s license and registration.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
0
Bmore on December 18, 2012 at 6:05 PM
The 2nd Amendment is my license. No other one is needed.
SAZMD on December 18, 2012 at 6:08 PM
Obamaclaus
Schadenfreude on December 18, 2012 at 6:09 PM
They aim I make criminals of us all. Just ask that nut lostmotherland.
jawkneemusic on December 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM
Although at the beginning of a steep descent, gang activity and urban violent crime rates were very high in the mid-90s and gun control was seen largely in that context. In particular, the Police unions were very effective in lobbying for new gun laws. Gun control was seen as a part of an overall anti-violent crime package which included 100,000 additional police officers on the streets and the V-chip technology in TV sets.
Violent crime rates have fallen pretty steeply and although you see crime reports on TV, there isn’t the palpable fear of urban violent crime there was in the 90s. In the 90s, even many gun owners were willing to go along with some gun control if necessary to support the police’s efforts to pacify urban ghettos. Unlikely that gun owners would feel similar acquiescence is necessary today.
Moreover, Clinton was also able to paint gun owners with the brush of extremism through the brief ascendancy of the early 90s militia movements, and incidents such as Ruby Ridge and Waco.
Robert_Paulson on December 18, 2012 at 6:23 PM
Incidents, yeah that’s one word for them.
roy_batty on December 18, 2012 at 6:30 PM
Waco in particular was like a Fast & Furious that actually worked.
It was entirely illegal and immoral and John Reno not only skated on it, he made Billy Jeff look like a serious hombre (to the masses).
Too many ironies to count not least that Reno was the worst AG in history when it came to police-officer involved shootings: she always ensured that the the book was thrown at the cop, regardless of circumstance.
Good thing we have his brother as Sec DHS now.
CorporatePiggy on December 18, 2012 at 6:32 PM
Hit Me With Your Best Shot, Progs: Which One Was Banned Under The Old AWB?
M2RB: The Beatles
The Delusion of the Left: If The NRA Went Away, We Could Have “Common Sense” Gun Control
M2RB: Aerosmith
Resist We Much on December 18, 2012 at 6:43 PM
Well, one thing that hasn’t changed is liberals complete and comic ignorance of firearms. You know, clip, magazine, tomato, tohmahto.
2lbsTest on December 18, 2012 at 7:33 PM
Heller and McDonald. That’s the difference.
alwaysfiredup on December 18, 2012 at 8:08 PM
Bingo I refuse to have any conversation about banning guns until those decisions are recognized by the left as being a right I have.
I have the right to own a gun, suck it up. Now what should we do to prevent theses shootings from occuring?
F15Mech on December 18, 2012 at 8:38 PM
Me too. Screw [another] “national conversation”. Screw relitigating this issue. Our rights are protected from government intrusion by the Second Amendment. Get used to it.
petefrt on December 18, 2012 at 8:55 PM
Doesn’t matter. 51% of the electorate stated loudly and clearly that they don’t give a rat’s A$$ about gun rights, or fiscal sanity or lying congressmen and presidents. And the major news media will do all they can to back them. Fail.
HiJack on December 19, 2012 at 12:47 AM