Likely first target of new gun-control push: High-capacity magazines
The White House is looking at various options, and the scope and details of the president’s approach aren’t clear. One possibility likely to be considered is a ban on high-capacity magazines, the devices attached to firearms that store large numbers of bullets and reload them rapidly.
A 1994 ban on assault weapons that expired in 2004 included a ban on ammunition magazines that held more than 10 rounds. Recent shootings, including the one Friday, have involved firearms with much more capacity, allowing a shooter to fire many more shots before having to reload, which could allow someone to intervene.
Assault weapons are a class of semiautomatic firearms, those that require a single pull of the trigger for each shot fired and then load the next round automatically. Under the 1994 law, there were 19 models of firearms and copies or duplicates of them that were banned, along with semiautomatic rifles that accepted detachable magazines and possessed at least two other characteristics, including a protruding pistol grip, flash suppressor or threaded barrel or a folding or telescoping stock.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4
Speaking of the irrelevant drug-free zones… A school near where I used to live was in a drug-free zone. It must have meant you could get your drugs for free, because a huge number of kids there had them.
The Rogue Tomato on December 17, 2012 at 2:44 PM
My mistake, he was an off duty police officer. Still, great that he managed to stop this would be killer.
jawkneemusic on December 17, 2012 at 2:46 PM
I just got my first AR this month. Thanks liberals! You talked me into it. I bought a couple 30 round pmags; looks like I better get a couple more.
Free Indeed on December 17, 2012 at 2:46 PM
Actually, they do agree. The NRA supported the federal Brady “instant background check”.
Wrong again. Janet Reno, AG of the Clinton administration, oversaw a mandated study on the effects of the federal assault weapon ban. They found no decrease in crime due to the ban.
Socratease on December 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM
I got my first AR (M&P 15T) the day after the election. Then I bought an Eotech red dot, 1,000 rounds and 20 30-rd pmags.
Just doing my part for the economy, Mr. President!
Washington Nearsider on December 17, 2012 at 2:49 PM
Congrats! I’m still stuck with my junky old AK. As a tribute to the media, I think I’m going to treat myself to one as well. I think there’s a gun show by me as early as next week.
The Count on December 17, 2012 at 2:50 PM
Ah, the intimidation factor. Facilitating come-to-Jesus moments since time immemorial.
mrsknightley on December 17, 2012 at 2:50 PM
M&P’s are great. Eotech is next in my list.
jawkneemusic on December 17, 2012 at 2:53 PM
I had an M&P .40 when I was active and loved it, so it was a logical step. My -15T came with flip sights which I love, but the holo-dot is just nice. Point and click.
Washington Nearsider on December 17, 2012 at 2:55 PM
Part of the reason for that might be the overly broad stroke of the “mentally unstable” part. If there were any teeth in the existing federal ban due to involuntarily commitment to a mental institution, a person could be banned for life for being sent to the state for bulimia treatment.
e.g. The Newtown shooter would have been cleared because he wasn’t “in the system”, but Karen Carpenter would have been banned.
The Schaef on December 17, 2012 at 2:58 PM
This story will never been seen on any national legacy media outlet…it does nothing to further their narrative so it did not happen.
d1carter on December 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM
If I have to point a gun at an evil doer, I want it to be as scary looking as possible, holding a lot of ammo. The point is to dissuade the evil doer from visiting evil on me, and it’s hard to accomplish with a pink-colored single shot .177 pellet ObamaRifle.
JohnTant on December 17, 2012 at 3:16 PM
The NRA absolutely agrees with keeping guns away from the mentally ill, or more precisely, those adjudicated to be so.
Problem is, lots of states won’t release mental health records to the NICS database out of privacy concerns. Can’t have it both ways, you know.
JohnTant on December 17, 2012 at 3:19 PM
This…..
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/12/16/connecticut-school-shooting-doesnt-deter-crowd-at-gun-show-in-montgomery-county/
tencole on December 17, 2012 at 3:22 PM
Many of you continue to make the same mistake. You operate under the assumption leftists really care about our safety but are just misguided in their thinking. Wrong! They know damn well the criminals will continue to commit crimes no matter what laws they pass. Any new law passed will be designed to control you, not the criminals. They could not care less about you or those kids that were murdered. This is all about power to them.
Fazman on December 17, 2012 at 3:35 PM
Another abandoned thread, eh sesquipedalian?
rogerb on December 17, 2012 at 3:40 PM
Merry Christmas!
cptacek on December 17, 2012 at 5:04 PM
Maybe they should ban tape too!
Lanza taped together two cartridge magazines to his Bushmaster .223 calibre rifle so that he could flip between the two with speed and ease, The Daily Telegraph has been told.
And thanks to that law, Columbine never happened. Oh…wait.
xblade on December 18, 2012 at 12:02 AM
No, he wasn’t. He was tackled when his gun jammed. By the way, how did tackling work out for the Principal in NewTown?
Speaking of tackling, should be no problem tackling someone like this while reloading.
xblade on December 18, 2012 at 12:53 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4