How to twist statistics to push your gun-control agenda
To support his statements, he refers to Kieran Healy, a Professor at Duke who works in a completely different area of sociology, but doesn’t hesitate to butcher statistics to reach the conclusion he wants. He produced this pair of charts, showing the occurrence of assault victims for the US vs. the other OECD nations, and for different regions of the US.
Since you’re smarter than Professor Healy, you’re undoubtedly wondering why he picked deaths to indicate violence, rather than number of assaults. You may also be wondering why he picked victims instead of offenders. Finally you may wonder, after reading through his posts, why he found it difficult to break out deaths due to firearms from all assault deaths, when the data is readily available via the FBI.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I can recommend a couple counters as well:
gunfacts.info had a PDF of vetted facts and stats.
and Guy Smith (website guy) had a book out that eviscerates the Gun Ban people called Shooting the Bull
ProfShadow on December 17, 2012 at 6:04 PM
as well all know, Leftism gives you the right to lie, cheat and steal without criticism…and moreover gives you the right to bully those Non-Leftists without repercussion
reynolds…eviscerating the half-wit leftist pols and media morons:
r keller on December 17, 2012 at 6:15 PM
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/159800/
r keller on December 17, 2012 at 6:16 PM
But remember, the Romney people were the real liars because they said that FIAT was planning a Jeep plant in China when everyone knows FIAT is actually only planning a Jeep plant in China.
forest on December 17, 2012 at 6:18 PM
Just say it’s for the children.
Bishop on December 17, 2012 at 6:19 PM
AWB is signed in 1994.
Murder rate per 100,000 inhabitants:
1994: 9.0
1995: 8.2
1996: 7.4
1997: 6.8
1998: 6.3
1999: 5.7
2000: 5.5
2001: 5.6
2002: 5.6
2003: 5.7
2004: 5.5
AWB expired in 2004.
Murder rate per 100,000 inhabitants:
2005: 5.6
2006: 5.7
2007: 5.6
2008: 5.4
2009: 5.0
2010: 4.8
2011: 4.7
The murder rate peaked at 10.2 per 100,000 inhabitants in 1980.
CCW laws:
In 1986: 1 state was UNRESTRICTED; 8 had SHALL issue;
26 had MAY issue; and 15 had NO issue.
In 1987: 1 UNRESTRICTED; 9 SHALL Issue; 24 MAY Issue; and 16 NO Issue.
In 1990: 1 UNRESTRICTED; 15 SHALL Issue; 20 MAY Issue; and 14 NO Issue.
In 1994: 1 UNRESTRICTED; 20 SHALL Issue; 17 MAY Issue; and 12 NO Issue.
In 1998: 1 UNRESTRICTED; 30 SHALL Issue; 17 MAY Issue; and 7 NO Issue.
In 2002: 1 UNRESTRICTED; 31 SHALL Issue; 11 MAY Issue; and 7 NO Issue.
In 2009: 2 UNRESTRICTED; 37 SHALL Issue; 9 MAY Issue; and 2 NO Issue.
In 2011: 4 UNRESTRICTED; 37 SHALL Issue; 8 MAY Issue; and 1 NO Issue (Illinois’ ban has just been struck down by the Appellate Court).
The murder rate has been falling in correlation to the the increase of CCW. I wonder why???? Hmmmmm….
The AWB or CCW Laws: Which Has Had More Of An Impact On The Murder Rate?
Resist We Much on December 17, 2012 at 6:24 PM
Statistically, children are by far most often targeted at schools.
We should ban children.
The Rogue Tomato on December 17, 2012 at 6:56 PM
How about another twist, lie, or propaganda.
Friday we were told that the shooter in the Conn. school left the .223 in his car trunk. Today we are told he used a Bushmaster AR 15 and two semi automatic pistols to do the shooting, most of which was carried out we are told with the Bushmaster. Well guess what, the Bushmaster shoots the .223 round, the pistols something else. How could he have left the .223 in the car trunk and still carry out the shootings with a Bushmaster if it was the only .223 he had at the scene including what he supposedly left in his car trunk?
Just like all these mass shootings the government continues to lie and deceive to push an agenda. Now we are told he left a shotgun in the trunk conveniently allowing for the government to push it’s agenda against so called assault weapons.
bgibbs1000 on December 17, 2012 at 7:07 PM
When you distrust the government the most, it is most important to be armed. That’s what the Second is fundamentally about. That the government serves at our (citizen) pleasure, not the other way around.
I would just hope that things calm down. But if the anti-gunnies don’t get a clue, they may find they are losing an argument the hard way.
ProfShadow on December 17, 2012 at 7:33 PM
Just think — if the shooter was reduced to using a butcher knife, he could have only killed, what, one whole classroom of kindergarteners before police finally got around to shooting him.
Count to 10 on December 17, 2012 at 7:46 PM