America’s first big digital defeat
Under the perverse U.N. definition of progress, Mr. Touré is delighted with the ITU undermining the open Internet. “History will show that this conference has achieved something extremely important,” he said. “It has succeeded in bringing unprecedented public attention to the different and important perspectives that govern global communications.” The treaty calls on countries to “elaborate” their views on the Internet at future ITU conferences, so these issues are here to stay.
Robert McDowell, a Republican member of the Federal Communications Commission, summarized the harm. “Consumers everywhere will ultimately pay the price for this power grab as engineers and entrepreneurs try to navigate this new era of an internationally politicized Internet,” he said. “Let’s never be slow to respond again.”
One lesson is that the best defense of the Internet is a good offense against an overreaching U.N. The majority of authoritarian governments in a one-country, one-vote system will keep chipping away at the open Internet. The best way to stop them is to abolish the ITU.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Aside from physically cutting off access in their home countries – something authoritarian regimes do regardless of such treaties – this means nothing. The software arms race can only have one winner: hackers.
ernesto on December 17, 2012 at 6:44 PM
Well the UN can’t really claim it’s for democracy anymore.
But it’s not like Tor doesn’t exist.
Greek Fire on December 17, 2012 at 6:47 PM
Why not just pull out of the UN and kindly ask them to move it somewhere else? Without the billions in US money the UN will begin to disenigrate. No one else is going to front billions to keep it and it’s thousands of socialist and Islamist parasites alive.
darwin on December 17, 2012 at 7:04 PM
I think is a great excuse to stop funding the U.N. Without it there are many dictators who would be completely ignored.
They get their money back when they give the oppressive regimes the boot.
goflyers on December 17, 2012 at 7:07 PM
Yeah coz who needs radios, cables, and satellites to work effectively together.
lexhamfox on December 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM
The UN means nothing here. Those countries cut the cables when they see fit – no treaty will change that. So long as the physical connection is there, hackers will do their work and information will be free. When authoritarians, “cut the hard line”, things change, but again, they do that anyway.
ernesto on December 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM
Until the dismissal of Hamadoun Touré the United States should not send a penny to the UN.
amazingmets on December 17, 2012 at 8:08 PM