2012: The best year ever
The doom-mongers will tell you that we cannot sustain worldwide economic growth without ruining our environment. But while the rich world’s economies grew by 6 per cent over the last seven years, fossil fuel consumption in those countries fell by 4 per cent. This remarkable (and, again, unreported) achievement has nothing to do with green taxes or wind farms. It is down to consumer demand for more efficient cars and factories.
And what about the concerns that the oil would run out? Ministers have spent years thinking of improbable new power sources. As it turns out, engineers in America have found new ways of mining fossil fuel. The amazing breakthroughs in ‘fracking’ technology mean that, in spite of the world’s escalating population — from one billion to seven billion over the last two centuries — we live in an age of energy abundance.
Advances in medicine and technology mean that people across the world are living longer. The average life expectancy in Africa reached 55 this year. Ten years ago, it was 50. The number of people dying from Aids has been in decline for the last eight years. Deaths from malaria have fallen by a fifth in half a decade.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The link is now broken, although it worked much of the day as I stopped by more than once to laugh at the comments.
Comments, I should add, which in total may have caused the Spectator to sit up and take notice of how epically dumb this article was.
monkeyboy on December 17, 2012 at 11:24 PM
It’s a terrifying thought, but that might actually be true: it may be all downhill from here.
logis on December 18, 2012 at 1:50 AM
Oh, It’s a Wonderful Life…
ExpressoBold on December 18, 2012 at 7:53 AM
Maybe because there has actually been negative growth. The methods for calculating GDP growth and unemployment etc were not set up to properly work with the levels of money printing and workforce abandonment we’ve been seeing. The US and Europe have been in a recession/depression for 4 years.
forest on December 18, 2012 at 8:05 AM