What Republican unity means for the fiscal cliff
Boehner on Thursday told reporters that he is not concerned about keeping the speaker’s gavel as he continues his negotiations with the White House. “What I’m concerned about is doing the right thing for our kids and grandkids,” he said.
But what’s notable is that both Cantor and McCarthy seem to have lost favor with conservatives who are openly floating wish lists of potential new speakers.
“Now, they’re all basically just viewed as the same [as Boehner] — one team. Not somebody we’d turn to if we wanted change,” said one House Republican, who asked not to be identified. In short, Cantor and McCarthy may be sticking with Boehner because their fates are linked to his.
Rutgers’s Baker said the lockstep approach of Republicans could ultimately give Boehner less leeway to compromise in the talks.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Another example of how establishment republicans are just as much big government goons as their liberal mirrors. Hey, instead of voting to increase spending and the debt ceiling why don’t we try to get back to our roots of fiscal conservative, federalism, individual liberty and non-intervention.
MoreLiberty on December 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM
He says that like it’s a bad thing.
Odysseus on December 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM