Dianne Feinstein: I’ll introduce an assault-weapons ban in the Senate

This has always been the weakness of the Second Amendment. While an outright seizure would cause a backlash leading to the death of politicians and a reorganization of Government (noticed how I avoided banned terms on HotAir?) the incremental approach has always held a danger. Liberals seek to disarm because it allows them to implement policies that even shame will not repeal. They think that if they move slowly enough, no one will fire on them. Already they have done things for which our forefathers would have displaced them in power (see, I did it again!). For example, tell me what Washington and Jefferson would have said about bringing in boatloads of Muslim Somalis and dumping them in communities where they rape and pillage? What would our forefathers said about leaving our Southern border porous so that “Free White men” were being not only displaced in their own Country, but losing jobs to these Aliens as well with the help of the Federal Government? These would have been resisted vigorously through arguments backed by lead, if implemented all at once, but by taking the slow approach, no one wants to be the first to pull the trigger and the damage is far more extensive than if stopped at once.

If a rank amateur like this kid can cause such hysteria, imagine what a full blown Beslan school horror would bring.

Bulletchaser on December 16, 2012 at 12:51 PM