The doctor won’t see you now
Why is it taking so long? Well, because everything in America now takes long, and longer still. But beyond that malign trend are more specific innovations, such as the “Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology,” which slipped through all but unnoticed in Subtitle A Part One Section 3001 of the 2009 Obama stimulus bill. Under the Supreme National Coordinator, the United States government is setting up a national database for everybody’s medical records, so that if a Texan hiker falls off Mount Katahdin after walking the Appalachian Trail, Maine’s first responders will be able to know exactly how many bisexual gun-owners she’s slept with, and afford her the necessary care.
This great medical advance is supposed to be fully implemented by 2014, so the federal government is providing incentives for doctors to comply. Under the EHR Incentive Program, if a physician makes “meaningful use” of electronic health records, he’s eligible for “bonuses” from the feds — a mere $44,000 from Medicare, for example, but up to $63,750 from Medicaid. If you have a practice at 27 Elm Street and you’re treating the elderly widow from 22 Elm Street, she’s unlikely to meet the federally mandated bi-guy requirement, but you can still qualify for bonuses by filing her smoking status with Washington. For medical facilities in upscale suburbs, EHR is costly and time-consuming, and, along with a multitude of other Obamacare regulatory burdens, helping drive doctors to opt out entirely: My comrade Michelle Malkin noted the other day that her own general practitioner has now switched over to “concierge care,” under which all third parties (whether private insurers or government) are dumped and a patient contracts with his doctor solely through his checkbook. Some concierge docs will even make house calls: Everything old is new again! (For as long as the new federal commissars permit it.)








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Oh brave new world!
I’m gonna go crack another bottle of bourbon. It’s about all the medicine I’m gonna be able to afford here shortly.
TKindred on December 15, 2012 at 8:16 PM
gosh darn I love free health care!
tom daschle concerned on December 15, 2012 at 8:18 PM
You can’t have universal healthcare when ~50% of the population outright doesn’t pay into it and more of the remainder cannot afford to.
MelonCollie on December 15, 2012 at 8:22 PM
I feel sick..oh wait….
redlucy on December 15, 2012 at 8:22 PM
This is going to be a mess.
I know how shocking it is that a government run by Democrats could actually screw something up, but this is going to be an epic fail. /
justltl on December 15, 2012 at 8:23 PM
Ah! But all our legislators past and present have heir own private system – and are not subjected to all these indignities.
honsy on December 15, 2012 at 8:24 PM
Thank goodness that our dedicated public servants won’t have to participate and will therefore be spared the debacle that they created.
justltl on December 15, 2012 at 8:25 PM
Wait, so if someone admits to not having firearms in their home, that puts them in a higher risk category, right?
justltl on December 15, 2012 at 8:29 PM
Don’t get Mark Steyn – or me – started on Canada’s single-payer system, let alone the NHS the Brits still worship.
What’s truly frightening is that the U.S. seems now by design to be far more bureaucratic than the civil servants of Canuckistan could imagine in their wildest dreams. Every agency seems to write its own regulations which have the force of law other than the rare occasion when somebody manages to challenge them successfully.
Add in to this mix 10 times the population of the Great White North and it’s going to be a nightmare when Obama gets us to where he wants to take us.
Drained Brain on December 15, 2012 at 8:33 PM
Meaning no insult to conservatives, but the average American is so dumb and so clueless I wouldn’t want them anywhere near a lethal weapon.
MelonCollie on December 15, 2012 at 8:36 PM
May everyone who voted for this, and for Him, rot in Hell.
Thomas More on December 15, 2012 at 8:42 PM
Many of them will.
Sadly.
MelonCollie on December 15, 2012 at 8:47 PM
You know, for some odd reason, when I read that, I pictured the illustrious Hank Johnson wielding a firearm.
I think that you just presented the only cogent argument for gun control that I ever heard.
However, one could apply the same principle to driving a vehicle, using sharp utensils, bearing children, operating a lawn mower or posting on the internet, so there is that.
justltl on December 15, 2012 at 8:50 PM
By the way, I was referring to Hank Johnson, Congressman and Certified Moron, of Georgia.
justltl on December 15, 2012 at 8:58 PM
For some odd reason you made me think of Homer Simpson looking down the barrel of a gun to see if it’s loaded.
*BOOM*
Blackfaced Homer: “D’oh!”
0.0 …thank you…that’s quite an honor.
The best basis I’ve ever heard for if something should be regulated at all – at the state or federal level – are these three questions:
1. How badly can it be dangerous to people besides the user?
2. How quickly can it be dangerous to people besides the user?
3. Can it be regulated without massive expenses and/or gross violations of freedom?
To apply those to some examples, denying guns to convicted felons and former inhabitants of looney bins is hardly a violation of freedom or hideously expensive. We require driving tests because a 1000-lb vehicle at any real speed is a definite “yes” to #1 and #2.
But regulating having children (as much as Democrats would be the ones denied) would not only be mind-bogglingly expensive, but a Hugh-Jass question mark on freedom. And regulating sharp knives not only violates #3 outright, but it is absolutely laughable.
MelonCollie on December 15, 2012 at 9:06 PM
We are so screwed.
ramesees on December 15, 2012 at 9:14 PM
Now if China would only ban knives, school children would not be injured by a lone maniac.
honsy on December 15, 2012 at 9:14 PM
Schadenfreude, is that you?
ShainS on December 16, 2012 at 2:49 AM