<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/12/15/secretaries-of-safe/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:20:32 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Secretaries of safe</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Obama believed, and those around him believed perhaps even more strongly, that his own oratorical and convening gifts &amp;#8212; the sharp break from Bush which he was prepared to make &amp;#8212; was itself a powerful diplomatic tool that would raise America&amp;#8217;s standing in the world and change its relations with adversaries and rivals. The policy of &amp;#8220;engaging&amp;#8221; even adversaries like Iran and North Korea was based both on a calculus of mutual interest and on the magic of a new moment and a new man. But it turned out that the &amp;#8220;Obama Effect,&amp;#8221; as one senior State Department official called it, was much weaker than expected. &amp;#8220;The idea was that there would be something reciprocal from bad actors,&amp;#8221; the official said, &amp;#8220;and we found out very quickly that wasn&amp;#8217;t the case. We&amp;#8217;ve gone back to a more traditional sort of approach.&amp;#8221; &amp;#8230;]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:05:59 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Erika Johnsen]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/2012/12/15/secretaries-of-safe-n98301</link></item></channel></rss>