The liberal case against Susan Rice
But the Libya debacle aside, Rice was under increasing scrutiny over her record of militarism, including her support for the invasion of Iraq, her backing of authoritarian African leaders and her description of her post as ambassador to the UN as being intended to provide “unwavering support for Israel”. …
After Rice was appointed as Obama’s ambassador to the UN, she strongly backed military intervention in Libya; she has also pressed for American intervention in Syria. Rice has also said that “there is no daylight” between the US and Israel over Iran’s nuclear programme. Her supporters say that merely reflects the White House position.
Nonetheless, Rice’s vigorous support of Israel, not just at the security council table but in other forums, has raised eyebrows. She has gone to lengths to woo the biggest of the pro-Israel lobby groups, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and Jewish groups. Abraham Foxman, director of the Anti-Defamation League, told The Forward that he regards Rice as a “gladiator” fighting to defend Israel in hostile atmosphere of the UN.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
She likes Israel?!? She must be a cornball Democrat.
KS Rex on December 14, 2012 at 9:43 AM
The only liberal case is whether or not Rice can hurt the Exalted One. The woman could advocate slaughtering every member of the OWS, if Bark still liked her then so would the libs; they’re blind to the excesses of this administration.
Bishop on December 14, 2012 at 9:46 AM
I couldn’t read that due to the horribly loud “cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo” crowing from the words.
Lourdes on December 14, 2012 at 9:57 AM
Always handy to throw in THE JOOOOOS when conditions turn on ya’.
Lourdes on December 14, 2012 at 9:59 AM
Okay – so, nobody likes Susan Rice – BUT, it’s not like she’s going away or anything. The stupid lying b*tch will simply continue assisting obama in destroying America from her current position, or, be given some other position with even more power – nothing is going to change – the destruction of America will continue, which should please obama’s freeloading cultists.
Pork-Chop on December 14, 2012 at 10:00 AM
…especially when your political history includes recently advocating for race-based selectivity in Africa and elsewhere.
Lourdes on December 14, 2012 at 10:00 AM
They were especially careful not to tell Susan “race-card” Rice that Sammy Davis Jr. isn’t the only Jooo.
viking01 on December 14, 2012 at 10:08 AM
No no no this was all due to the racist women hating gop
-andrea Mitchell
cmsinaz on December 14, 2012 at 10:35 AM
The libturds are only going to punish us by saddling us with the grumptastic John Kerry.
stukinIL4now on December 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM
she wasn’t sharia compliant enough
tom daschle concerned on December 14, 2012 at 11:26 AM
Hahaha! A white husband too!
Rice is enigmatic, but I’m confident she would have made a better Sec of State than the haughty gigilo.
petefrt on December 14, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Wonder why they really decided to drop her?
entagor on December 14, 2012 at 11:45 AM