The “Hunger Games” approach to layoffs: Two journalists enter, one journalist leaves
The Kansas City Star recently told two of its journalists, Karen Dillon and Dawn Bormann, that only one of them could keep her job — and the employees themselves would have to decide who should leave the company, according to the media blog JimRomenesko.com…
Companies sometimes ask workers to step forward in a voluntary layoff situation, but pitting one person against another is not the way to go, said Nan Russell, host of the “Work Matters” radio show and author of “The Titleless Leader.”
“Personally, I think it’s very appalling that individuals would be in that kind of situation — not only from the emotional standpoint for them to have to make that decision, but also for what happens to the people who are left behind and their now lack of respect for the leaders in that organization,” she said.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Use the tracker jacker wasp nest trick!
Fallon on December 13, 2012 at 4:23 PM
Presstitute Thunderdome!
Steve Eggleston on December 13, 2012 at 4:25 PM
We need this at the WH, Senate, and House as well…
gatorboy on December 13, 2012 at 4:25 PM
Fire Jason Whitlock instead.
22044 on December 13, 2012 at 4:25 PM
Fire them all.
SirGawain on December 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM
I’ve seen this happen at a place I worked.
Frank Enstine on December 13, 2012 at 4:29 PM
Trying to see what is wrong with this. People always moan that employers who fire employees are heartless and make the wrong decisions. It would be interesting to find these specific employees writings on this subject and see if perhaps they are getting just rewards in being given the power they say other employees should have.
astonerii on December 13, 2012 at 4:30 PM
It’s just different when it happens to “journalists” right..?
d1carter on December 13, 2012 at 4:32 PM
Two Men Enter, One Man Leaves!
BigGator5 on December 13, 2012 at 4:34 PM
Hmmm. King Solomon dilemma?
22044 on December 13, 2012 at 4:35 PM
Battle of the Network Ts & As!
UltimateBob on December 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM
Wouldn’t want to use something like performance appraisals now would we. One of these employees is better than the other most likely.
What the heck am I thinking that never works. wait, what…
D-fusit on December 13, 2012 at 4:40 PM
thats horrible.
rob verdi on December 13, 2012 at 4:50 PM
Dissappointing. I was actually hoping to see Rachel Maddow vs. Chris Matthews in Thunderdome.
gravityman on December 13, 2012 at 5:00 PM
When it happen at the place I worked both employees were valued. It was cutbacks that required one of them to leave. If they didn’t decide then the lab manager would. Simple as that. The younger single guy decided to leave and let the older guy with kids stay on.
Frank Enstine on December 13, 2012 at 5:02 PM
This is cowardly and betrays a complete absence of leadership. Disgusting.
flipflop on December 13, 2012 at 5:17 PM
No contest. That Maddow dude would cream Chrissy the Sissy.
trigon on December 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM
This is the official way now in Obutthead’s Amerika–anything goes!
stukinIL4now on December 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM