Obama’s not serious about cutting spending, is he?
Certainly, the political gridlock of his first term was not all his fault. But he’s the president, and by every historical standard of negotiating leadership in partisan times — Abraham Lincoln, Lyndon B. Johnson, Bill Clinton — he falls short…
Republicans are going to risk the wrath of Rush Limbaugh, Sen. Jim DeMint, the tea party and potential primary opponents to raise taxes — albeit under duress.
Now Obama should be willing to risk offending AARP, the unions and liberals by moving entitlement programs — not to mention the country — toward solvency.
After all, he doesn’t have to run again — and having the nation with its debt under control would be a legacy worth having.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
What clued you in, Mort, Bark’s long experience in the private business sector? Anyone with intelligence above that of a honey badger could see this coming 4 years ago.
Bishop on December 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM
Duh!
RoadRunner on December 13, 2012 at 9:52 PM
OK, Mort. Got that one right. You can go back to sleep.
davidk on December 13, 2012 at 9:54 PM
My Gawd, if all you read were summaries from HotAir’s Headlines you’d think every major institution in this country is run by ‘full retards’.
Oh, wait…
WeekendAtBernankes on December 13, 2012 at 9:55 PM
Please excuse my humble correction, oh Great Writer of Wit, but we knew 6 years ago.
davidk on December 13, 2012 at 9:56 PM
Holy cow, if you lose Mort………
Cindy Munford on December 13, 2012 at 9:57 PM
Why do these talking heads assume Barackabama wants what’s best for America? What MORE does he have to do to prove otherwise? Good GAWD we’re surrounded by idiots.
SouthernGent on December 13, 2012 at 10:00 PM
Yeah right. Ever notice how they only print this crap right after one of their would-be despots wins an election?
WeekendAtBernankes on December 13, 2012 at 10:00 PM
Trick question. He could open the “reeducation” camps and they’d cheer him for it if they mentioned it at all. Pretty sure he could run for a third term and the media wouldn’t emit so much as a whimper in protest. It’d be full on “THE COUNTRY NEEDS THIS.”
Who’d have suspected that David Ehrenstein was so prophetic?
WeekendAtBernankes on December 13, 2012 at 10:03 PM
That’s not the legacy he wants, Mort.
Sucker.
trigon on December 13, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Fixed
FloatingRock on December 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM
Mort, for the first two years of his presidency, Obysmal had the whole Dem party in Congress at his beck and call. Stop making excuses for him.
onlineanalyst on December 13, 2012 at 11:00 PM