Good Will Fracking
In other words, a typically stupid Hollywood thriller plot, except for a minor deviation: The poor shmuck actor is Matt Damon and he’s making a real movie, albeit with its own typically stupid Hollywood plot, one that doubles down on the conventional “evil oil company” stereotype. …
If a screenplay leaked by the pro-fracking activist Phelim McAleer is accurate, art dies in Mr. Damon’s movie in an ironic way. In the real world, water-pollution fears put forward by fracking’s opponents have proved largely hokum. The movie deals with this inconvenient fact by turning its eco-activist protagonist into an agent provocateur of the oil company, whose job is to discredit the environmental opposition from within. …
Bad art is bad art. It seeks to compensate for its own lack of confidence by inflating the stakes. What makes fracking fascinating is precisely the quotidian fact that, in every way, we are inclined to celebrate economic progress except when it disturbs our own familiar scenery and routines. Fracking, for this reason, is proving to be the most carefully observed, policed and debated industrial revolution in the history of industrial revolutions. And a movie that had the courage to be interesting about all this might actually be worth watching.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
So, if I’m reading this correctly, a movie by Hollywood intended to change public opinion presupposes that its audience is grotesquely stupid.
What’s so different about that?
Red Cloud on December 12, 2012 at 4:30 PM
Irony.
Big Oil is funding this movie because fracking challenges their energy domination. And even though Damon and his Hollywood pals hate Big Oil so so much they’ll take its money to fight Big Evil Fracking.
Useful idiots on display.
2lbsTest on December 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM
Matt Damon is a graffiti punk.
beatcanvas on December 12, 2012 at 4:52 PM
I saw the trailer for this before Taken 2(which was horrible BTW, but at least I saw it for free). They went out of their way to not hype up the anti-fracking element of the plot. In fact, I can’t remember if it even came up.
Doughboy on December 12, 2012 at 4:55 PM
So how is it that you guys just totally ignore the way fracking puts methan and other flammable chemicals into the water supply?
libfreeordie on December 12, 2012 at 5:09 PM
http://www.coloradoan.com/article/20121205/OPINION04/312050044/No-data-linking-fracking-water-contamination
beatcanvas on December 12, 2012 at 5:13 PM
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-finds-evidence-fracking-contaminated-groundwater-2012-9
libfreeordie on December 12, 2012 at 5:19 PM
Same way you ignore the evidence that it doesn’t.
Esthier on December 12, 2012 at 5:25 PM
That article form the Coloradoan cites studies through 2011. The EPA cited article from 2012 indicates documented water contamination.
libfreeordie on December 12, 2012 at 5:31 PM
1. You obviously don’t know what the word “may” means.
2. You don’t know if the water contained the chemicals prior to fracking. In Pennsylvania the O&G companies are now testing nearby water PRIOR to fracking so that they can prove what was already in the water.
3. If a bad cement job is performed on any oil well then ground water contamination can occur. This is true even if no fracking is performed. The only way to eliminate the risk is to eliminate ALL domestic oil and gas wells (both fracked and unfracked). Such risk elimination measures would fail all government risk-reward and cost-benefit analyses.
Let me know if you have any questions. I’m happy to educate ignorant liberals like you.
blink on December 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM
Wrong, idiot.
It indicates the inclusion of “several different hydrocarbon gasses, including methane, ethane, propane, and several higher molecular weight compounds” in the groundwater sampled.
Are you really so clueless that you don’t know that hydrocarbon’s often exist in Wyoming water?
Do you know that hydrocarbon gasses are often “bubbling” or escaping up from the source rock?
Why do liberals HATE science?
And again, even if there was contamination, it doesn’t mean that such contamination was caused by the fracking.
blink on December 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM
Because, dude. Free methane!
TexasDan on December 12, 2012 at 6:01 PM