Newest side effect of global warming: No more pasta?
Extreme and volatile weather patterns are especially threatening to durum, which is more finicky than conventional wheat varieties. If too much rain falls at the wrong time, durum’s quality can be ruined. Too little rain isn’t good either. Because durum is trickier to grow, farmers require a price premium over what conventional wheat earns. Already, Opland and other farmers complain, grain companies have been shrinking these premiums to boost their own profit margins. As climate change intensifies and durum gets even harder to grow, how high will the price premium have to rise to entice farmers to take the risk? Opland wonders whether he will plant durum at all next year.
Nonspecialists sometimes suggest that agriculture can easily adapt to climate change by shifting crops to more climatically congenial locations. Last July, Rex Tillerson, the CEO of ExxonMobil, called climate change “an engineering problem [that] has engineering solutions,” one of which is to “move crop production areas around.”
But reality is not so simple. “If you eat most of what you grow, as is the case for many farmers in the world’s poorest countries, moving your farm is not an option,” IFPRI’s Nelson points out. Indeed, even a more prosperous farmer in North Dakota can’t just pick up and move to follow changing weather conditions.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Don’t bust my balls. OK?
Oil Can on December 10, 2012 at 11:49 AM
Even if the climate is changing permanently (a very, very big if), not even the most Gorelike alarmists are suggesting that temperatures will change significantly over a human lifetime. It’s all gradual change.
Sounds to me like some farmers are whining about normal price fluctuations from a few poor harvests and feel the need to take it out on somebody. Might as well be the faceless, money-grubbing oil industry.
KingGold on December 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM
I could try to respond to this article on the “merits,” but I just don’t have the energy anymore. This tripe is so transparently phony that it just wears me out. Scientists are now predicting the amount of wheat produced in 2050… oh shut up…
Shump on December 10, 2012 at 11:51 AM
Such lies.
Funny how they completely ignore the drought of the 1930′s … when 46 out of the lower 48 states were in drought. They seem determined to write the temperatures and drought of the 30′s out of the history books.
In addition, while the US may have experienced a heat wave … Europe experienced a cold summer.
For the global warming nuts … global means global, not local.
darwin on December 10, 2012 at 11:52 AM
Put on extra sauce & one will know the difference.
Blake on December 10, 2012 at 11:58 AM
Indeed, but the farmer can change which crop he / she will plant. Just figure out what will grow best in the existing conditions.
Mitoch55 on December 10, 2012 at 11:59 AM
“No more pasta” is a secret dog whistle for “no more Italians”.
Catahoula on December 10, 2012 at 12:00 PM
CAGW history only started about thirty years ago and ends around 1998. They will sometimes go further back or forward if it helps the cause.
Frank Enstine on December 10, 2012 at 12:01 PM
About these “do whistles”. How come all the people that claim not to be bigots can hear them?
Frank Enstine on December 10, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Awesome, I’m on a no-carb diet.
John the Libertarian on December 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM
If only global warming meant no more corn and potatoes too, we all would be.
alwaysfiredup on December 10, 2012 at 12:09 PM
So global warming=lower wheat yields=lower pasta production=lower carb intake=lowering the obesity rate? Al Gore should be exited then, guy is bursting at the seams. Of course I don’t think its a pasta issue, he needs a girlfriend.
This is math I did not learn in college.
reddevil on December 10, 2012 at 12:12 PM
You should tell that to anyone down wind of you.
CorporatePiggy on December 10, 2012 at 12:19 PM
They’ll figure it out one way or another.
John the Libertarian on December 10, 2012 at 12:30 PM
BREAKING: Food is grown outdoors.
Very good, Newsweek. Next week we’ll study flowers.
chimney sweep on December 10, 2012 at 12:33 PM
Will this make AlGore even richer?
Schadenfreude on December 10, 2012 at 1:11 PM
40 years ago they said we only had ten years to save the planet.
30 years ago they said we only had ten years to save the planet.
20 years ago they said we only had ten years to save the planet.
10 years ago they said we only had ten years to save the planet.
Today they say we only have ten years to save the planet.
In ten years we’ll only have ten years to save the planet.
darwin on December 10, 2012 at 1:20 PM
A comprehensive list of things blamed on global warming, with links.
The Rogue Tomato on December 10, 2012 at 1:22 PM
It’s a damned shame that one of the side effects of gorebull warming isn’t fewer progressives.
trigon on December 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM
I’ve just read the first page so far, and it’s based on a completely false premise. The record shows there has no increase in droughts in the US over the last century, and there has no increase in hurricanes and tornadoes. Every time one of these warmers mentions Sandy in an article, I know that a lot of bad science is to follow.
juliesa on December 10, 2012 at 1:44 PM
Especially since the thing that made Sandy dangerous was she hit at high tide. If Sandy at hit at low tide it would have been a completely different story.
darwin on December 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM
Duh, weather runs in 30-60 year cycles, with longer cycles overlaid. In the 50′s, the Texas drought was so lengthy that desert vegetation moved east. Then the opposite occurred.
I have all sympathy for farmers because ever-changing weather is something that will never go away, but don’t try to fix this by passing laws and taxes. That will have the same effect on the weather as burning witches (which is what Europeans used to do to fix the weather).
juliesa on December 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM
We need to start the DC witch trials. I nominate Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton to be tried as witches first.
The Rogue Tomato on December 10, 2012 at 1:56 PM
I’m really looking forward to the resurgence of the great ancient vineyards in Greenland.
I hear that the 998 Brattahlid Cabernet Sauvignon was superb.
LegendHasIt on December 10, 2012 at 2:11 PM