Abolish social studies
Today’s social studies textbooks will not turn children into little Maoists. The group happy-speak in which they are composed is more fatuous than polemical; Hanna’s Reconstructionist ideals have been so watered down as to be little more than banalities. The “ultimate goal of the social studies,” according to Michael Berson, a coauthor of the Houghton Mifflin Harcourt series, is to “instigate a response that spreads compassion, understanding, and hope throughout our nation and the global community.” Berson’s textbooks, like those of the other publishers, are generally faithful to this flabby, attenuated Comtism.
Yet feeble though the books are, they are not harmless. Not only do they do too little to acquaint children with their culture’s ideals of individual liberty and initiative; they promote the socialization of the child at the expense of the development of his own individual powers. The contrast between the old and new approaches is nowhere more evident than in the use that each makes of language. The old learning used language both to initiate the child into his culture and to develop his mind. Language and culture are so intimately related that the Greeks, who invented Western primary education, used the same word to designate both: paideia signifies both culture and letters (literature). The child exposed to a particular language gains insight into the culture that the language evolved to describe—for far from being an artifact of speech only, language is the master light of a people’s thought, character, and manners. At the same time, language—particularly the classic and canonical utterances of a people, its primal poetry—has a unique ability to awaken a child’s powers, in part because such utterances, Plato says, sink “furthest into the depths of the soul.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I would have never learned about the Tasaday’s communist utopia if it weren’t for social studies.
tom daschle concerned on December 10, 2012 at 11:06 PM
If it weren’t for social studies class, I might have had to take math and science homework home occasionally.
malclave on December 10, 2012 at 11:09 PM
Or we could just switch our education system to vouchers and we wouldn’t have to care a whit about what schemes Dem nuts and Bush cronies cook up to add texture and nuance to our children’s education.
HitNRun on December 10, 2012 at 11:12 PM
Let’s get back to history and geography.
Cindy Munford on December 10, 2012 at 11:12 PM
Kids now have a disney view of history. They think the Civil War was a giant race war. Indians were naive twits that had their land ripped away from them when they invited the white man into their peaceful amusement park gift shop. Vietnam was Nixon’s fault. Goldwater was racist because he didn’t vote for the last civil rights bill. JFK was just the greatest president we ever had.
All nonsense.
In another thread, there was a complaint that movies are being re-imagined in a darker form to gain an audience. Well, why not just stop sugar coating real history? The kids would eat it up.
MechanicalBill on December 10, 2012 at 11:16 PM
Abolish public schools.
WisCon on December 10, 2012 at 11:25 PM
How about abolishing teachers who are okay with teaching this pablum? It that requires the whole school, I’m okay with that.
beatcanvas on December 10, 2012 at 11:29 PM
Yeah, gosh darn those kids learning about the world and how to care for their fellow man.
mythicknight on December 10, 2012 at 11:51 PM
In the early ’80s, I had to take “social studies”. I’m sure it was nothing like kids get today, but my teachers were liberals, to be sure. Still, critical thinking protected me from being permanently wired to think that way by this propaganda. Most people, unfortunately, are not born with critical thinking skills. Therefore, they are susceptible to believing pretty much whatever they are told at the junior high stage. There’s the problem.
School teachers comprise the most left wing of all professions. How convenient, therefore, that they are the ones who get to tell your kids all about the world from 9 to 3. Five days a week.
Good luck fixing that.
keep the change on December 10, 2012 at 11:55 PM
Home school FTW!!
History of the World: Part
I & IIDad29Victor on December 11, 2012 at 12:07 AM
This can be fought, but it takes conscientious parenting. I homeschooled my kids for a bit, and we did non-stop history lessons about the Founders, and the American Revolution. It made a big difference to my kids, I think. I know I’m old fashioned, but I could do this because I am a stay at home Mom. Most of the working moms I know are exhausted by the end of the day, and it is enough putting food on the table, and making sure the regular homework gets done. Our problem is cultural- things were different when most moms were at home. I know people will shriek “Mommy Wars!” but that is not what I’m saying- I have no beef with working moms-I’m saying it is too bad that women have so much to juggle now that they can’t stem the tide, and have to rely on failing public schools.
Kristamatic on December 11, 2012 at 12:13 AM
Yes, because no one ever cared about his fellow man if he didn’t take a class based on empty leftist moral preening.
DrMagnolias on December 11, 2012 at 12:22 AM
I was looking at Reagan’s farewell speech tonight. His warning was very prescient:
INC on December 11, 2012 at 12:36 AM
Back in the olden days, teachers would not have dreamed of telling your about their personal beliefs. Politics would have been consider unprofessional. We need to get back to that.
Cindy Munford on December 11, 2012 at 12:47 AM
Way back when I was just breaking out with my first zits on my punim, I advocated abolishing social studies.
And math.
And science.
And English.
And history.
VINDICATED!
Shy Guy on December 11, 2012 at 1:47 AM
The nothing wrong with public education that vouchers can’t fix.
petefrt on December 11, 2012 at 5:09 AM
There are a lot of teachers that are conservative, like me.
We are just quiet about it bcs we hate being verbally assaulted at work.
I do not preach my beliefs. But my students have an idea of where I stand on some issues.
However, I strive hard to have a culture of respect for other opinions in my classroom.
We do discuss politics, as it relates to science.
And I stress the importance of keeping those two separate in most cases. We explore what junk science has done to this country.
The students ask for my opinion about a lot of things & I’m choosy about which things I reply to. But I always supply logical reasons & I give the pros & cons of both sides of thought & explain why I have chosen the side I am on.
Badger40 on December 11, 2012 at 6:13 AM
I used to think that was true.
But since we see what the electorate has wrought, I doubt this will be a good thing.
Get the Feds out of public education.
Let the states keep their $$ & educate their kids their own way.
Badger40 on December 11, 2012 at 6:14 AM
Yes, because I want some bureaucrat deciding what constitutes “caring for your fellow man.” I’ll teach morality to my kids thank you very much. You teach them how to read, write, and do arithmetic.
Odysseus on December 11, 2012 at 7:51 AM
I had a very liberal social studies teacher who made me defend all the liberal viewpoints in class because he knew I was a conservative.
Best teacher I ever had.
While the liberal viewpoint is prevelant I think the problem is the caliber of some of the teachers. We had one in Junior High that became a teacher because he failed at being a stand up comic. That’s what you have to fix IMO.
gophergirl on December 11, 2012 at 8:09 AM
If you don’t believe that the old textbooks didn’t have political message you’re either ignorant of their content, dishonest or an idiot. Neither of the three are admireable.
libfreeordie on December 11, 2012 at 8:27 AM
A double negative and a misspelling in one “sentence.” Public schools are great!
Ted Torgerson on December 11, 2012 at 8:41 AM
Abolish any subject that has the word “studies” in its name.
zmdavid on December 11, 2012 at 9:39 AM
Even as a kid in high school we figured that half of the teachers were dropouts from other majors. They couldn’t cut it there so they just got a teachers certificate. The teachers who wanted to be teachers as a vocation were the best, the rest were just there.
BullShooterAsInElk on December 11, 2012 at 9:42 AM
Obama has a fix for that, now they can just go on permanent disability and never have to work.
zmdavid on December 11, 2012 at 9:47 AM
Little known fact: At Harvard, one can actual “concentrate in” Social Studies.
steebo77 on December 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM
Also, “neither of the three.” “NEITHER OF THE THREE.”
libfree, really?
steebo77 on December 11, 2012 at 10:01 AM
OK.
lostmotherland on December 11, 2012 at 10:04 AM