The tax code’s war on married women
Here’s how the marriage penalty works: Mr. and Mrs. report a combined income to the IRS. This pushes them into a higher tax bracket than they, or at least one of them, were in when they were single, so their taxes rise. They are taxed on their joint income even when electing to report as “married filing separately.”…
The government penalizes most harshly the professional situation that is most desirable for many women: self-employment. A self-employed woman will always pay taxes at a higher rate than that of her salaried husband earning the same amount. The “self-employment tax” hits the independently motivated worker (regardless of sex) with both the employer and employee contributions to Social Security and Medicare. There is no reason to exempt self-employed women from paying into Social Security and Medicare like everyone else. But the fact remains that a woman making a living as an independent contractor sees less of her income than a woman with a boss.
And then there is childcare. If a couple decides to hire someone to care for their children at home, their options are: take another financial hit and hire an accountant, or buckle in and get cracking on the I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification form, the W-4 Withholding Allowance Certificate, the SS-4 Application for Employer Identification Number, IRS Publication 926 Household Employer’s Tax Guide, Form 1040ES, Estimated Tax Payment Coupons, Schedule H Household Employment Taxes, Form W-2 and W-3 reporting forms, and a similar series of state forms. The forms come with different due dates and different penalties for missing the due dates—it can be dizzying just trying to file the proper paperwork by the right date. Employing a nanny is akin to taking on an extra part-time job, the burden of which tends to fall on the mother.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
You are wrong. Self employed women see every penny that an employed by a boss. The only difference is that the boss never shows the employed person their lost wages. The self employed person has to see that money turned over to the government.
astonerii on December 9, 2012 at 5:10 PM
Where married women lose also is at the lower end of the income spectrum. As a single mother filing head of household making $20,000 with three kids she will owe zero income taxes, get her FICA contributions refunded through Additional CTC, and get $4,000 or so in EITC. If she marries a man making $40,000 she loses all that money. The credits seem designed to keep lower income women single and dependent on their sugar daddy Uncle Sam.
Ted Torgerson on December 9, 2012 at 5:18 PM
I am sure it is working as designed.
astonerii on December 9, 2012 at 5:22 PM
Democrats are in charge. Democrats do not want women to marry. Married women tend to eventually come to support the Republican position. Single women are statistically more likely to be recipients government benefits and support the Democrat position on fiscal policy (rob everyone with a good job and give it to everyone who doesn’t have one).
crosspatch on December 9, 2012 at 5:30 PM
Boy, this is the truth. A few years ago my husband and I were finally working at the same time and our kids were too young to leave alone after school. We hired our next-door neighbor’s daughter, who was attending community college. We could not believe how many ridiculous government forms we had to fill out, and we had to pay state unemployment tax as well as set up IRS withholding.
rockmom on December 9, 2012 at 5:58 PM
^
This.
Gingotts on December 9, 2012 at 5:58 PM
BINGO! This is a simple fact that my economically illiterate Obama voter “friends” refused to understand. The morons wanted to pretend they were paying just as much in taxes as my self employed wife and I who have to pay this BS 16% self employment tax on top of our income bracket. For a two man operation with two kids to support we get by. The only reason our income has been stagnate and haven’t been able to grow our business or save any money since we started it 4 years ago is because nearly 45% of our money is stolen from us by the Feds. Then once you add in state, local and sales taxes, over 50% of our wealth….gone. Money that could be spent on advertising, trade shows, hiring employees but instead is going towards ObamaPhones, free housing and generally POS like this … and this….
jawkneemusic on December 9, 2012 at 6:31 PM
This. One of the biggest cons in the tax code is the “employer portion” of the FICA tax. The FICA tax rate is actually twice what people think it is, because the employer portion (which of course comes out of what an employee would make if the tax didn’t exist) isn’t reported as income withheld.
sadarj on December 9, 2012 at 6:37 PM
This sentence makes me cringe. Working part time so I can take care of my children is hardly a luxury! It is a financial nightmare. We struggle to make ends meet with this decision, and it wasn’t made lightly.
Now I am only on the couch watching television and eating bon-bons AFTER I shop for clothes all day…Imagine!
redlucy on December 9, 2012 at 7:28 PM
Stopped reading when it talked about a women’s check “pushing the couple into a higher tax bracket”. How do people still not understand the concept of a marginal tax rate? Sheesh.
Rainsford on December 9, 2012 at 8:32 PM