Why doesn’t Obama shmooze more?
This president is not a misanthrope, exactly. But neither is he what we used to call in the 70s “a people person.” He has all the friends he thinks he’ll ever need, is not interested in making new ones, has limited time for the grip and grin that is the lifeblood of retail politics, and is almost certainly the most introverted president of modern times.
Look: I understand. The White House holiday-entertaining schedule is a horrifying ordeal. Spending three or four hours at a time shaking hands is surely a nightmare. Some 50,000 people troop through the White House every December (including at open houses the First Couple does not attend). In Bill Clinton’s day, the parties were so large and the receiving lines moved so slowly that some guests skipped the photo op for another bite of shrimp cocktail or another spin around the dance floor. What president wouldn’t rather be curled up with a good book or a family movie, especially a president with children as young as Sasha and Malia Obama?
But the president’s party protocol is nevertheless a revealing insight into his political style, and an example of the troubles he has had “connecting,” not only with angry old white men but with the capital’s warring tribes. If Lincoln could hold near-constant public receptions during the depth of the Civil War (including one on the night his young son, Willie, lay dying upstairs), surely Obama could put himself out a teeny bit more. Have fewer parties, but shake more hands? Invite some guests only every other year? What state legislator or city councilman, what county chairman or advocacy-group leader, wouldn’t kill for 15 or 30 seconds of the president’s time, once every year or so?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
He’s only going to shmooze if there is money in it.
Cindy Munford on December 8, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Nobody forced him to run for President when he had two children who were so young. And the answer to the question “Why doesn’t he schmooze more” is “He’s an aloof guy who doesn’t like people.”
radjah shelduck on December 8, 2012 at 10:38 AM
… After the election – I don’t have to give a rip
jake-the-goose on December 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM
Can it be done on the golf course?
Cindy Munford on December 8, 2012 at 10:40 AM
He won…… and America lost.
CW on December 8, 2012 at 10:41 AM
Hey, why doesn’t this guy who we treat like he just cured cancer no matter how bad he screws up do ________!?
Kataklysmic on December 8, 2012 at 10:44 AM
He might run the risk of talking to someone that might talk about themselves rather than praising him. So no more people-time than absolutely necessary.
thebrokenrattle on December 8, 2012 at 10:46 AM
If he doesn’t say anything on record, he can’t be held to anything.
It’s what mob bosses do.
Mimzey on December 8, 2012 at 10:51 AM
Kings need not shmooze. Kings need only rule.
Catahoula on December 8, 2012 at 10:52 AM
Bowl like someone in the Special Olympics, you didn’t build that, spread the wealth around, bitter clingers, speak Austrian, punish our enemies, not optimum…
rogerb on December 8, 2012 at 10:57 AM
Be careful what you wish for.
- President-elect Joe Biden
Seth Halpern on December 8, 2012 at 10:58 AM
In case you missed it.
rogerb on December 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM
Ah oh, did he call a reporterette “Sweety” again, or did someone finally report the 18% pay discrepancy?
Cindy Munford on December 8, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Because He is an A$$?
Dingbat63 on December 8, 2012 at 11:12 AM
It’s not a question of shmoozing; it’s a question of taking other ideas seriously. Engaging with them, that back-and-forth.
Richard Epstein, a University of Chicago professor who taught with Obama, said that Obama never engaged in that back-and-forth, that give-and-take during discussions. He’d listen to other views but he wouldn’t engage with them. It would be two monologues and not a dialogue.
I think temperamentally he’s incapable of absorbing other ideas. He’ll listen to other ideas not to take anything from them but to find ways to defeat them.
Certainly he’s a pragmatist in the sense of understanding the limits that that political environment presents him. The number of votes, public opinion, et cetera. But that pragmatism is forced upon him and is not his true nature.
SteveMG on December 8, 2012 at 11:24 AM
He doesnt need to. He could kick and beat the scum from Vanity Fair into the next hospital and they still wouldnt wanna miss their dead line for the next presidential puff piece. So why would this guy wanna be nice to anyone?
Valkyriepundit on December 8, 2012 at 11:34 AM
BHO and schmooze? Not in his character. Dudes like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
tommy71 on December 8, 2012 at 11:45 AM
Because his hand gets overworked when pawing other “folks”?
onlineanalyst on December 8, 2012 at 11:50 AM
They lost me after “angry old white men.”
NavyMustang on December 8, 2012 at 11:52 AM
I question the premise of the question.
Why not consider that he’s just an asshole, and people don’t care if he schmoozes or not? POTUS photo-ops are what they are, and don’t indicate a relationship.
“Hey, here’s my picture with the asshole at the White House”
BobMbx on December 8, 2012 at 11:54 AM
I saw a man on F&F a few days ago say bho is the most arrogant person we have ever had as president! Being that is the case with bho, he doesn’t have to do anything he doesn’t want to!
L
letget on December 8, 2012 at 11:55 AM
Charlie Crist is available now.
Schadenfreude on December 8, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Does a god shmooze?
Schadenfreude on December 8, 2012 at 12:07 PM
Because people have cooties.
vityas on December 8, 2012 at 12:16 PM
Maybe, dumb ask, because he doesn’t like you
The guy has no trouble hugging Chavez et al
Did you miss that photo op?
entagor on December 8, 2012 at 12:21 PM
Because people are for talking to, not for listening to.
Jim Treacher on December 8, 2012 at 12:42 PM
Because like Nixon, he doesn’t like people that much. Next.
Boogeyman on December 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM