Let’s slam a spaceship into an asteroid
In 2005, the European Space Agency floated a half-baked “Don Quijote” plan to aim a spacecraft into an asteroid to deflect it. But the plan targeted a very large asteroid that was pretty far away, making it both expensive and unlikely that scientists on the ground could actually measure the asteroid’s deflection.
Instead, Cheng and his colleagues are betting that aiming at a small and close asteroid may be more feasible. Their goal is to crash into the smaller rock in a binary asteroid system called Didymos that is projected to travel past Earth in 2022.
“We are targeting the smaller member of the binary,” Cheng told LiveScience. “That will change the orbit of the system and that can be measured.”
Because the asteroid is relatively modest-sized, about 500 feet (150 meters) wide, the spacecraft would be able to move it noticeably from its regular orbit, allowing the scientists to measure how much the spacecraft shifted the space rocks from their course. Since it will be just 6.5 million miles (10.5 million kilometers) from Earth, scientists can measure the deflection from the ground using telescopes, he added.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I think Barack Obama should pilot this spaceship. He IS our savior, isn’t he?
Warner Todd Huston on December 8, 2012 at 10:39 PM
These chuckleheads will probably cause the rock to hit Earth.
Dack Thrombosis on December 8, 2012 at 11:12 PM
They are spending money to justify their jobs. A sane government would cut off their funding before they do something dangerous.
pedestrian on December 8, 2012 at 11:24 PM
If the regime’s Bureau of Muzzy Relations (formerly known as NASA) can manage to deflect the asteroid into a collision course with Israel then Obungler, Shrillary and pathological Rice likely will request that the probe and mission be renamed “Jihad 1″.
viking01 on December 8, 2012 at 11:26 PM
Who speaks for the asteroids? Who has the right to alter the relationship of these asteroids?
Obviously the EPA is not aware of this plan.
BobMbx on December 8, 2012 at 11:32 PM
What a waste of money.
Find the nearest pool table and extrapolate.
rdbrewer on December 8, 2012 at 11:44 PM
Hmm…….what could go wrong. The pointyheads never think bout that, do they.
tommy71 on December 8, 2012 at 11:52 PM
FIFY
Resist We Much on December 9, 2012 at 12:02 AM
Let it burn!!! Heh…oh wait…
DeathtotheSwiss on December 9, 2012 at 12:11 AM
A bit like how we fight wars: our guys go ram into the enemy, while the Europeans monitor.
Tzetzes on December 9, 2012 at 12:17 AM
Meh, more like we ram the big obvious asteroid, declare mission accomplished, then try to set up a starbase in the middle of an asteroid field.
MelonCollie on December 9, 2012 at 12:21 AM
Wait, they can use computer models to tell us what the weather will be like 100 years from now but they can’t tell how much and object weighing X will move when hit by an object weighing Y?
I’m going to hang on to that Miami Beach property for a while.
crosspatch on December 9, 2012 at 12:43 AM
Hmmmm. Deflect … away from, or towards, that is the question.
OldEnglish on December 9, 2012 at 12:46 AM
Maybe if we built this big wooden asteroid we’d trick Didymos into doing what we want then we’d leap out in the middle of the night and that varmint Didymos wouldn’t know what to do….
Run away! Run away!
(spoken by a big fan of NASA in the days when an eventual moonbase as a way point to more distant exploration, the development of innovative defense technologies, survival systems and hard science frontiers constituted the mission objective instead of making Oblamer’s Muslim bros-in the Middle Eastern ‘hoods happy.)
viking01 on December 9, 2012 at 12:56 AM
We already nuked the moon, can we please end this senseless war on celestial bodies?
Left Coast Right Mind on December 9, 2012 at 1:02 AM
Obviously this is a plot of the bipartisan establishment to get rid of SMOD, because SMOD is the only real threat to their big-government agenda!
Valkyriepundit on December 9, 2012 at 1:18 AM
Walking on the Moon…
Ugly on December 9, 2012 at 1:27 AM
Let’s mine this asteroid for anything valuable and dump the rubble on Mecca.
It’s a win-win.
trigon on December 9, 2012 at 1:35 AM
That would have to be one heavy spaceship, then. Just to see Newton’s laws in action? After all, we’re not talking anything that would involve relativistic or quantum effects, here. Sounds like a total waste of cash and time.
I guess this is sort of a cosmic Cash for Clunkers. Eh … why not? We spent money to destroy perfectly fine automobiles. Why not spend tons more money to destroy a perfectly fine spaceship? Makes leftist sense.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on December 9, 2012 at 2:23 AM
Yeah. Law Of Unintended Causes, anyone? Idiots. (At least, if they can’t tell how much it will move, then they certainly can’t predict its eventual new orbit, now can they?)
GWB on December 9, 2012 at 7:42 AM
Seriously, is our state of the art of physics such that we can’t compute this to within 0.001%? We can send up a missile and hit a 500′ diameter rock hurling through space over 5 million miles away, but we don’t know what happens when we hit it?
Paul-Cincy on December 9, 2012 at 10:01 AM