Why you like to watch the same stuff over and over
Cristel Antonia Russell, a marketing professor at American University, and Sidney J. Levy, a marketing professor at the University of Arizona, conducted interviews of 23 subjects, all of whom had recently “reconsumed” a book, movie or vacation spot. The researchers used open-ended questions to elicit long and descriptive first-person answers, then analyzed the transcripts for recurring themes and key phrases. The responses suggested that sometimes choosing to do something again was about reaching for a sure thing—the brain knows the exact kind of reward that it will receive in the end, whether it is laughter, excitement or relaxation. They also learned that people gained insight into themselves and their own growth by going back for a do-over, subconsciously using the rerun or old book as a measuring stick for how their own lives had changed. One woman, for example, rewatched the romantic Kevin Costner movie Message in a Bottle more than once: “It was helping her work through having an engagement that hadn’t worked out,” Russell says. Every time she watched that movie, it reminded her of her own failed relationship—and her reactions helped her see she was getting over it.
“I was very surprised,” Russell says. “I thought that people reconsumed these things for nostalgia, to go back to the past. But they were actually very forward-looking and prospective.” What about the boredom factor, you might ask? There was none to speak of. After all, Russell says, paraphrasing Greek philosopher Heraclitus: You never cross the same river twice—it’s not the same river, and it’s not the same you.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
So, here again I am pretty much not like the mindless mobs. I rarely ever re-watch something and the only reason I reread anything is because the author takes 3 years to release the sequel and I like to make sure I remember what led up to the events in the new book.
astonerii on December 7, 2012 at 10:48 PM
I watched “Cast Away” this afternoon for the umpteenth time. I have no idea what that means, but I find something new in it every time I watch.
I still wonder what was in that package.
JPeterman on December 7, 2012 at 11:15 PM
That’s just pathetic. I can tell that chick why her relationship failed … she’s a friggin idiot! I’ll bet she made her boyfriend watch some stupid chick flick over and over and over again (to help her try and work out her failed adolescent relationships) until he just left her.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on December 7, 2012 at 11:22 PM
Im with astonerii, I rarely rewatch or re-read something. If my first impression was that i loved it, Ill go with that rather than chance ruining it with a re-watch
offroadaz on December 7, 2012 at 11:22 PM
Wonder no more.
Left Coast Right Mind on December 7, 2012 at 11:26 PM
Marcellus Wallace’ soul.
john1schn on December 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM
I don’t know how many times I have watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail. I venture to say I will watch it again several times in this life.
HawaiiLwyr on December 7, 2012 at 11:37 PM
Well there you go. A sample size of 23 people is telling us all why we do things.
LOL
Personally, I reread certain books because they make me feel good. They transported me to a different world and I was able to escape from reality. They’re like drugs.
ButterflyDragon on December 7, 2012 at 11:43 PM
JPeterman on December 7, 2012 at 11:46 PM
I re-read and re-watch things all the time, and for various reasons. I also read and watch things which I’ve missed in the past.
Right now, I’m reading War and Peace, which I never got around to when I was younger (insert plug for ereaders and free public domain ebooks). When I finish that, I’m probably going to pick up something I’ve read before, maybe some Heinlein or one of McCaffrey’s “Pern” books.
Reconsuming content can serve a useful purpose. Just think, if it weren’t for people going to movies they’ve already seen, millions of people might not be aware that HAN SHOT FIRST!
malclave on December 7, 2012 at 11:46 PM
There’s nothing wrong with repeating things you enjoy. I am re-reading “Les Miserables” for the 10th time. I’ve watched movies like “Casablanca” and “The Sound of Music” so many times, I can basically repeat them word-for-word. I’ve been to many places throughout the world many times. Why? For the one simple reason: I enjoy them. Because I get something new out of them with every view/read/travel.
I get that some people don’t like to do that and more power to you, I guess. But there are so many deeper meanings and truths that you can find if you repeat them.
Then again, I am clearly one of the “mindless mob”.
mjk on December 7, 2012 at 11:46 PM
I rarely watch anything more than once (exception being Monty Python). that being said, I’m rewatching Battlestar Galactica season 3… I don’t remember who The Five are…
LtGenRob on December 7, 2012 at 11:48 PM
Moe, Larry, Curly, Shemp, and Curly Joe.
malclave on December 7, 2012 at 11:56 PM
JPeterman on December 8, 2012 at 12:00 AM
I don’t do much re-watching of anything. Once I’ve seen it, I’ve seen it. I have a ton of DVDs and rarely touch any of them.
Warner Todd Huston on December 8, 2012 at 12:26 AM
Like bugs in amber.
Kenosha Kid on December 8, 2012 at 12:26 AM
Gah! You suq!
LtGenRob on December 8, 2012 at 12:40 AM
Question: Have you ever listened to a particular piece of music more than once?
Question: If yes, why?
There’s your answer.
OldEnglish on December 8, 2012 at 12:40 AM
Why do you go to see your friends more than once? I have books that are old old friends, and I like to revisit them every so often. Slipping on truths like an old glove, turning them this way, and that, reminds me of who I am and where I came from. Some books are acquaintances, you read them once, and you are done with them, because there is no depth. But other books take multiple readings to even begin to understand them, like an old friend that can still surprise you with new insights.
Those of you who have no friends like this, I am so sorry. I think you may be doing it wrong.
Kristamatic on December 8, 2012 at 1:59 AM
Wot?
I’ll have to ponder that the next time I watch the Stooges for like the bazillionth time.
justltl on December 8, 2012 at 3:12 AM
Wot?
I’ll have to ponder that the next time I watch the Stooges for like the bazillionth time.
Thought I’d give that theory a little test run.
Nuthin’.
nyuk nyuk nyuk
justltl on December 8, 2012 at 3:14 AM
I do catch myself reading the same stuff on Hot Gas
Dingbat63 on December 8, 2012 at 6:10 AM
Valkyriepundit on December 8, 2012 at 6:21 AM
What is it that murderous villain’s obsess over … The Catcher in the Rye, or the koran.
kregg on December 8, 2012 at 6:32 AM
Do you ever find yourself compelled to watch a movie on TV rather than from the disc that you own and can watch anytime?
RINOs are people too on December 8, 2012 at 8:50 AM
I do not enjoy repeats. Particularly ones that are decades old. Never have, doubt I ever will. I watched wizard of oz one full time through. I watched sound of music one time fully. Now, going places, that is great, each time you go someplace, it will actually be different. Different people, changes to the place, different routes that make the place different.
Sorry for the mindless mob comment. It is just that I associate Oprah watchers with the activity described by the author. Particularly the going back in order to evaluate how they have GROWN since the last time they watched or read it.
astonerii on December 8, 2012 at 8:56 AM
I was just thinking I rarely re-read a book (exception Anna Karenina) or re-watch a movie, while I’m sitting here listening to Saturday Morning Flashback on the radio… Duh!
Fallon on December 8, 2012 at 9:14 AM
I seldom re-watch movies. But I do re-read books.
I have ADD. I have to read non-fiction titles over because it takes me a while to grasp what the author is saying.
I re-read fiction (mostly westerns [and Clancy]) because I forget that I’ve read them, and then about halfway through I recognize something.
davidk on December 8, 2012 at 9:18 AM
I have friends like that on HotAir.
davidk on December 8, 2012 at 9:23 AM
Heh.
davidk on December 8, 2012 at 9:24 AM
I reread Tolkien for Details I’ve missed or watch a TV show for nuances I misunderstood the first time.
I am not sure the human experience can be jammed into a can that says “This is why you like something”. For example: Music.
There is a son, “Turn the Page” by Bob Segar. I like the jazzy beat and the images of him being up on the stage and his description of the terrible loneliness of the life on the road.
At the same time, it is a repellent portrait of an insipid character; here is a guy doing exactly what he likes and making millions doing it, but he regrets not being able to beat up the locals, who by tradition wear short hair and he, as a singer, wears long hair and when they make comments about it, cowardly refuses to fight over it because the odds are never in his favor. What a clown.
So when I listen to this song over again, What is it I like about it?
Psychologists are such a lost group.
Bulletchaser on December 8, 2012 at 9:39 AM
Am I the only one who thinks this sort of “research” is pretty worthless? Please tell me these two professors didn’t get any sort of federal grant for this crap. Isn’t it more than obvious that if we enjoy a certain activity the first time (for whatever reason), there’s a good chance we’ll want to go back and do it again?
Let me save these professors from wasting their time on their next “study”. If we haven’t had a positive experience the first go around…then it’s likely that we won’t return for more. Mmmkay?
Now. Someone please tell me why these so-called educated educators can’t seem to figure out a more worthwhile project. How much freakin’
time was wasted on this? They would have reaped a greater benefit if that time had been spent volunteering at the local nursing home.
lynncgb on December 8, 2012 at 9:42 AM
I watch Errol Fynn movies periodically to make sure he hasn’t forgotten what I taught him.
Seth Halpern on December 8, 2012 at 10:13 AM
Flynn
Seth Halpern on December 8, 2012 at 10:13 AM
What does it mean that I have re-watched “A Clockwork Orange” 9-10 times in the last 35 years?
phineas on December 8, 2012 at 10:28 AM