No one is serious about debt
Actually, by proposing a tax increase for spending with no real corresponding cuts, the president has been arguing for growing deficits. And with a priority on “fairness” over prosperity, any chance of easing the $16 trillion national debt through an economic boom in the near future is improbable.
When you cut through the coverage, in fact, you’ll also find that the second most pressing item on the president’s agenda—after tax hikes on the wealthy and small businesses—is winning the unlimited authority to raise the country’s debt limit. Obama—who personally sat down with CEOs at the Business Roundtable to press his case—argues that having a cap on debt, rather than unlimited debt, is a “bad strategy” for the nation.
After that, much of the deceptive “savings” or “cuts” offered by Obama were already coming from the winding down of campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan—this itself supposedly temporary spending that is now baked into the baseline. You will remember that for Democrats, including the president, funding these wars by borrowing was unconscionable. Turns out, only the wars were the problem, not the trillions.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Maybe I should quit being serious about my debt?
I’m going to make a $100,001 coin out of clay and put it on deposit in my bank.
Of course, that doesn’t leave enough clay for the feet of the GOP…could be a problem.
ProfShadow on December 7, 2012 at 9:00 PM
I’d argue that democrats are serious about debt.
tom daschle concerned on December 7, 2012 at 9:03 PM
Ha! I am!
Liar, liar pants on fire!
.
cntrlfrk on December 7, 2012 at 9:08 PM
No kidding and if you are you are some kind of horrible crazy person.
Cindy Munford on December 7, 2012 at 9:08 PM
The smirking Just-Us Benedict “Egomania” Roberts deigns that the serfs shall obey Ocommiecare before jetting off to Italy, quisling Boehner lusts, tearfully, to become the first human traffic cone before Al Gore does and Oblamer dreams to make America his personal Zimbabwe….Nanzi Pelosi and Dingy Harry remain determined to spend like a Kennedy in a whorehouse…
I’m shocked, I tell ya… shocked!
viking01 on December 7, 2012 at 9:09 PM
I suggest the fiscal doomsday we’re waiting for is already in motion, and all the banter in Washington is merely a Potemkin Village PR stunt conducted for our benefit while in the backrooms they sit around, buying Chinese lottery tickets.
Its musical chairs, and there are no more chairs to sit on……when the music stops, it all comes crashing down.
Watch for big money to get out of cash and into tangible objects. That’ll be the sign.
BobMbx on December 7, 2012 at 9:09 PM
No-one is serious about debt. The GOP still thinks (charitably speaking) that we’ll be able to grow our way out of this debt. The democrats think that printing money is fun and that there are no consequences to easy money (and, should you insist on consequences, well, tax the “rich” some more).
Cutting spending is in neither party’s DNA and the public is stone-cold deaf as to the subject. To most people, to cut the spending we need only stop foreign aid. There is a massive cognitive dissonance between the sheer amount of government goodies most people receive, which they won’t give up for any reason.
Hell, one can’t even really get a majority of the supposedly fiscally-conservative party to go along with real spending cuts. Mention getting rid of entitlement programs, and you’ll be treated to harangues about how that’s “their” money. Same thing for government medical care (aka Medicare). Same thing for cherished tax deductions, like the mortgage tax deduction, which are essentially government subsidies.
No-one wants to give up their goodies.
Over the cliff we go.
Revenant on December 7, 2012 at 9:11 PM
Step 1: Run for office, preferably as a Democrat.
Step 2: Win.
Step 3: Break whatever laws you feel necessary to secure your financial future.
Step 4: Retire so that you can “spend more time with your family.”
chimney sweep on December 7, 2012 at 9:15 PM
I think you are correct.
davidk on December 7, 2012 at 9:19 PM
It may be that the creditors and potential creditors will be the first broad class of men to “get serious” about the debt. Getting serious about it seems to involve losing credulity about debts being repaid and becoming doubtful about extending or renewing credit. Once the Americans at large begin to read reports that creditors are becoming doubtful and are further straining their credulity only for greater interest, I somewhat suppose they will begin to acknowledge limits. One problem is that they may not acknowledge limits until the acknowledgement is too late to save them.
Marsili.us on December 7, 2012 at 10:51 PM
Has already happened. Buying farmland, guns, gold, and other commodities. We are in for a big crash when money printing stops working. The 30-40 years of credit expansion will be ugly when it snaps back. No clue how to go forward with my career.
Chubbs65 on December 8, 2012 at 1:51 AM
I’m not big money, but I’m feeling much better with my 40 acres, apple trees, and milk/beef cattle grazing away that my wife and I started with 7 years ago after selling our suburban house.
moo on December 8, 2012 at 7:37 AM