Run, Hillary, run: Majority want a Clinton 2016 candidacy
Public impressions of Hillary Clinton are at an all-time high, with a large majority of Americans giving her positive reviews as the country’s secretary of state and most wanting her to be a presidential candidate in 2016, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Overall, 57 percent of all Americans say they would back a Clinton candidacy, with support peaking among younger women.
Among all women, 66 percent say they would support Clinton as a candidate for president in 2016; it is 75 percent among those under 50 and 54 percent among those aged 50 and up. Forty-nine percent of men back a Clinton bid, regardless of what side of 50 they are on.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Ambassador Stevens will not be providing an endorsement.
Bishop on December 5, 2012 at 6:08 PM
Palin should have run.
John the Libertarian on December 5, 2012 at 6:10 PM
Good lord no.
rbj on December 5, 2012 at 6:14 PM
Well, America may not have yet gone over the cliff, fiscally – but mentally …
OldEnglish on December 5, 2012 at 6:19 PM
If Americans will elect an incompetent buffoon like Obama President, they’ll elect Hillary…so I’m guessing she’s the next POTUS if she wants it.
Look on the bright side – she can’t POSSIBLY be worse.
DRayRaven on December 5, 2012 at 6:21 PM
I agree..It is so sad..
Dire Straits on December 5, 2012 at 6:21 PM
Has 57% of the country no effing idea why Stevens and the others were killed? This is unbelievable. She’s not capable of baking cookies.
Basilsbest on December 5, 2012 at 6:24 PM
RunWaddle, Hillary,RunWaddle!Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth … Run, SARAH, Run!
SARAH Is a RUNNER – Hillary is a waddler.
PALIN 2016!
Pork-Chop on December 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM
Lady MacDeath, eh? Why am I not surprised.
Rae on December 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM
Behold just how cretinized the country has become.
Not hyperbole, not political polemic. Wow.
A public figure with no qualifications, no talent, no ideas, nothing than a last name shared with a disgraced – and failed – president, and who has been a notable disaster and embarrassment at SecState, even by recent standards. With, actually, the only serious
And she is viewed favorably.
It’s easy, even fun, for folks to go nuts on comment threads about how doomed we are, etc. But looking around us, and including this latest small bit of data – it seems we have, really, finally entered a whole new level of national dysfunction.
IceCold on December 5, 2012 at 6:26 PM
We have the most uneducated, ignorant electorate in the western world. Hillary is just Obama in a skirt.
darwin on December 5, 2012 at 6:32 PM
Face it Hill is popular. Another reason GOP should have won presidential race.
Tasha on December 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM
“With actually, the only serious disaster involving a dead ambassador in decades on her watch”
(was missing from my last rant, sorry)
IceCold on December 5, 2012 at 6:35 PM
Which is why the Let It Burn bandwagon is getting crowded these days. It’s even got a spot for someone with the username of “IceCold”.
Doughboy on December 5, 2012 at 6:35 PM
Good Lord.
forest on December 5, 2012 at 6:43 PM
Reminds me of that movie about the collapse of Rome, when the city is shown engaging in mass hedonism as the Praetorian Guard takes screamed bids from various rich citizens to be the next emperor.
This is no longer about ability or experience or fitness for the job, we’ve entered new territory where a simple name or skin color is now considered all the qualification someone needs to be POTUS.
Bishop on December 5, 2012 at 6:44 PM
I will continue to harp on this for 4 more years:
If Hillary runs in 2016, she will win handily. Our candidate makes no difference.
The only solution is to play their game–attack Hillary and the Clinton legacy now, and keep the attack sustained for 4 years.
Attack her paper thin record as a Senator, her horrible record as SOS, keep up the Benghazi attack, etc. We need to remind people of the ugliness of Bill’s legacy too, all the sleazy sex scandals, instead of letting everyone only romanticize the good parts
If we let Hillary go unscathed for the next 4 years, she will win the election without breaking a sweat no matter who we run, period
thurman on December 5, 2012 at 6:50 PM
Well, Doughboy, I tend to think it’s already burning – and that the dramatic, kinetic event or series of events that some seem to hope will put some learnin’ to the clueless electorate is a vain hope. Both elements.
First, a “meltdown” seems less and less likely. In 1979, a few phone calls was enough to have an administration’s budget “rejected” by the bond markets. Back when there was some financial, fiscal, and economic sanity in much the of the populace and even among the “elites”. Today? Seems a long, slow, tortuous rot is much more likely – in fact it’s already started. So much of the populace effectively isolated from ecomomic reality (govt. job or transfer payments). Economic illiteracy and general lack of seriousness (youth vote, and parts of other demos). And behind it all, Fed intervention – from CA to Europe – the more markets become detached from underlying reality, the more insolvent state govts. can continue on with their insanity.
Second, the mouse in the maze (electorate) does not look like any electric shocks will produce a rational response. Election 2012 – ’nuff said. As if the “press” (broken information system) would provide info or framework to the “electorate” (broken, cretinized, astonishing ignorant, bigoted, and short-sighted) that would produce a change in course following any dramatic “burning”. It won’t.
All this takes place against a background of lawlessness (states ignoring their own constitutions to borrow money without voter approval, courts way off their rails and issuing capricious and absurd rulings unhitched from reality, language, or logic – see Justice Roberts and the four cretins on the SCOTUS, executive order abuse, virtual and unconstitutional suspension of whole sections of the law such as immigration).
Any of the “let it burn”ers here really think that this electorate, with this “press”, and this political elite, and this judicial system, and this level of illiteracy about almost all key elements of life and citizenship, would materially change its ways after another financial crisis? Really??
IceCold on December 5, 2012 at 6:51 PM
May she be in a creche soon, in diapers/Depends, with Reid, McCain, Biden and most who are over 60 in DC.
Schadenfreude on December 5, 2012 at 6:52 PM
I can’t see her winning the primary in 4 years, honestly. I think that the Democrats have found their formula. In 2014 they’ll run an unknown minority to pander to either blacks or hispanics and have him use his entire Senate or House term running for President with tons of media praise and absolutely zero vetting.
DeathtotheSwiss on December 5, 2012 at 6:54 PM
Benghazi happened on her watch as head of the State Department. So, yeah. She CAN and WOULD be worse.
Mitoch55 on December 5, 2012 at 6:56 PM
GOP better get away from the MEN – and go strong with conservative WOMEN
All over the country
jake-the-goose on December 5, 2012 at 6:59 PM
Let me put this in plainspeak:
When Hillary runs, she will be 69 years old. She already looks like she is sick. She will not be like Ronnie Reagan, and be able to win.
No one elects an ugly old hag for a high office when 6 words can topple her:
“Doesn’t she look tired to you?”
And yes, my comment is superficial. It’s based on looks. And that’s alright with me.
UODuckMan on December 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM
Exactly, Bishop. The least fit member of the Carter Admin. would be as a colossus, nearly a Churchillian figure, in today’s Democratic Party. And even that least fit figure would never dream of the behavior and temperament on display now – to silence, if not golf claps.
I never got over the shock of the lightweight congressional staff colleagues who vaulted to serious foreign policy jobs in the Clinton years. That seems almost quaint compared to the absurd people now elected or appointed. No longer a serious country.
IceCold on December 5, 2012 at 7:10 PM
Let’s see if the electorate wants to stick with Democrats at all four years from now, Hillary notwithstanding.
Sekhmet on December 5, 2012 at 7:14 PM
You need to post more often. All three upthread were great—-ice water definitely but in a sick refreshing way.
arnold ziffel on December 5, 2012 at 7:17 PM
The only presidential election that will matter in 2016 is the Democratic primary. The president will be decided in the spring, not the fall. I hope it’s Clinton/Cuomo or Clinton/Booker.
Alpha_Male on December 5, 2012 at 7:27 PM
Wrong.
Hollywood’s best make-up artists, camera /lighting professionals and plastic surgeons will take care of any “looks” problems.
“Looks” are the Left’s wheelhouse.
Further, the pawns of the Left (networks, magazines, websites, etc..) will match her “look” to whatever poll tested image is to be projected upon her canvass.
The lovefest will be something to behold.
tonotisto on December 5, 2012 at 7:27 PM
Oh.. new troll coming from Mom’s basement like a good Beta Male (the handle ain’t fooling anyone). a little birdie told me that people generally like to switch parties after eight years and that the R candidates will have a median age about twenty five years younger than Clinton. So get ready to say President Ryan or President Rubio.
Illinidiva on December 5, 2012 at 7:38 PM
They used to say that Paris Hilton was famous just for being famous. Perhaps, but what, exactly, has Hillary ever actually done that was worthy of praise, or even worthy of noticing? Then again, Barky’s election (and re-election!) have so lowered the bar that pretty much anyone can and should be president.
The Cult of Personality just rolls on and on. This country is so fscked…
bofh on December 5, 2012 at 7:53 PM
Hee… Remember how Clinton was totes supposed to win in 2008.
Illinidiva on December 5, 2012 at 8:02 PM
Women always turn against women….
If women supported other women Hilary would have beaten Obama in the first place and we would have more women in political office. Hilary is not a great speaker and is not a great campaigner. Plus the country will be in awful shape four years from now.
William Eaton on December 5, 2012 at 8:07 PM