The illegal eagle and a badly grasping IRS
The arrival of “Canyon” at MoMA is the culmination of a five-year absurdist farce—one tinged more by Kafka than Feydeau—that involved the IRS, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the heirs of art dealer Ileana Sonnabend. It might have been laughable, except that the stakes were so high. …
The presence of the stuffed eagle meant it couldn’t be sold without violating the 1940 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Since the artwork couldn’t be sold, logic dictated that it be listed as having zero value, which is what the Sonnabend family’s three appraisers, one of them Christie’s auction house, did.
But don’t look for “logic” in any government dictionary. In the summer of 2011, the IRS sent the family an unsigned report appraising “Canyon” at $15 million. When they rejected the valuation, the government upped the ante: The appraisal was increased to $65 million, which yielded a $29.2 million tax bill. And the IRS levied a special “undervaluation penalty” of 40%, applied in cases where a party has made what the IRS deems a “gross understatement” of a property’s value. That added $11.2 million to the tab. Plus interest.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Here’s a photo of it.
Why did the government try to tax something with zero value? Same reason Willie Sutton robbed banks.
Q. Willie, why do you rob banks?
Willie: Because that’s where the money is.
The estate tax. It’s a wonderful thing.
Paul-Cincy on December 3, 2012 at 11:07 AM
So? This is our government at work, and the American people voted to continue it. None of it matters, because anyone with a piece of art that valuable is eeeeevil anyway.
Shump on December 3, 2012 at 11:07 AM
Even during FDR’s gold coin confiscation scheme, there was an exemption for collector coins. Hard to believe that a stuffed bird is worth more than ounces of gold.
platypus on December 3, 2012 at 11:09 AM
Reminder: Obama has added thousands and thousands of new IRS agents, with more to come.
Dem voters and the IRS, a match made in
HeavenHades.visions on December 3, 2012 at 11:10 AM
There was a time Congress would recognize such injustice and pass a law to stop it. Congress now is about passing all responsibility over to judges and bureaucrats.
Rocks on December 3, 2012 at 11:12 AM
Nobody beats the Feds. That’s why we need to make the Federal government as big as we possibly can make it. Then we’ll be unbeatable.
Paul-Cincy on December 3, 2012 at 11:26 AM
The law is either equitable, or it is not. We do not need a law passed, we need government officials impeached and thrown in the slammer when they do stuff like this to the citizens of the country.
astonerii on December 3, 2012 at 11:28 AM
There is no logic when it comes to the IRS tax code. It was written by a bunch of thieves who rob from those that produce and give to those who will vote them back into office, time and time again.
SC.Charlie on December 3, 2012 at 11:55 AM
Obviously you do you understand the value of art and the free market? I will agree that just to dig up gold and then smelt it down and put it back in the ground is a bit stupid. I remember the good old days when Americans weren’t allowed to buy gold.
SC.Charlie on December 3, 2012 at 12:01 PM
I like that. BTW, you had already signed off, but I wanted to let you know that I really liked your last long comment last night on the “more babies” thread.
This story is also a reminder that the estate tax is going to go back up, to 45 or 55%, and the exemption will decrease. Small businessmen and farmers hardest hit. forward!
juliesa on December 3, 2012 at 12:31 PM
That is a disgrace. To take away the tools a family built, usually together, for creating wealth is just lunatic.
astonerii on December 3, 2012 at 12:56 PM
So… is the federal government willing to PAY what they claim it’s worth?
I’m guessing that’s a big fat no.
logis on December 3, 2012 at 2:01 PM