Mimzey on December 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM

The primary voters, many of which were democrats destroyed the nation by picking one of the worst choices of those presented. Perry or Newt would have been much more likely to win the general. Reason? They would have actually been different than Obama to the typical voter, would have also had a more energized base that would have been willing to carry others to the polls.

S. Weasel on December 2, 2012 at 7:17 AM

In the last 2 years our insurance has doubled at work. Singles used to enjoy basic care for around 10 bucks a week and now are paying close to 22 bucks a week. Family coverage is now over 50 a week and you need to jump though hoops if your spouse has insurance now too… you have to prove that they do or your paying the extra money no argument about it.

Wethal on December 2, 2012 at 7:32 AM

Do they not already do a lot of that anyways ATM?

What can I do to help this along?

roy_batty on December 1, 2012 at 10:14 PM

The American Center for Law and Justice (the conservative counterpart to the ACLU) has been working on these cases. They may need donations.

watertown on December 2, 2012 at 5:17 AM

Same reason as Dodd-Frank. Power.

Control each and every part of the economy for “fairness,” and political correctness, and to maintain power through regulation and cronyism.

Watch for education to be next, with the “core curriculum” requirements being tied to federal funding. First it will be math and English scores, then, the PC version of American history…

I doubt that the Court would get into whether it is indeed a matter of faith for Baptists to object to this.

There is an old 1944 case called US v. Ballard, in which a radio preacher was sued for fraud. The US tried to argue, among other grounds, what he was preaching was not a genuine religious belief, but the Court would not go near that one.

MelonCollie on December 1, 2012 at 10:01 PM

What I never got was why we needed the feds to take over into the health care. Here in WI, you can get state insurance if your employer does not offer it. It may cost you money … yes there are brackets based on income, but you can get coverage. So the excuse that poor people could not get insurance nor afford it was nothing but a lie.

As for mittens, I do think he was a bad option because it took away the ObamaCare argument. I am sure liberals were jumping for glee when he got the nod.

All good…but why are you a hypocrite?

There is no care in it.