Opposing ObamaCare is no longer enough
In order to gain a mandate from the voters to reform our health-care system in a conservative direction, we will need to put forth a concrete agenda that shows how free-market reforms will reduce the cost of insurance, and why Obamacare will increase those costs. We will have to accept that repealing Obamacare is no longer possible, and instead step back and look at the health-care system as a whole and ask: If we were designing a health-reform agenda from scratch, what would it look like? …
“Step One of this new strategy would be to improve the market orientation of Obamacare’s insurance exchanges. The exchanges are larded with excessive mandates and regulations that will drive up the cost of their insurance products. Republicans in Congress should require the Department of Health and Human Services to reduce this regulatory burden.” …
“Step Two would be to move Medicare patients into Obamacare’s exchanges. For example, Congress could agree to raise Medicare’s eligibility age by three months every year for the foreseeable future. In effect, over time, this would gradually introduce premium-support-style reforms into the retiree population, without requiring Congress to get bogged down in complicated reform legislation.”
Step Three involves repealing or modifying Obamacare’s employer mandate, if it can be done in a deficit-neutral fashion, so that more individuals purchase insurance on their own instead of through their employers. Step Four involves migrating most of the Medicaid population onto the exchanges, something that will reduce the large disincentive for upward mobility that Medicaid now imposes on the poor.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
He writes as if members of Congress gave a sh-t about their constituents and didn’t give a sh-t about the DC cocktail party circuit.
Cute.
CurtZHP on November 28, 2012 at 10:36 AM
I’m always amazed when the spinmasters start buying into their own BS. None of this is going to matter when the government healthcare system collapses due to the oncoming default.
Doomberg on November 28, 2012 at 10:46 AM
ObamaScare is totally and completely un-Constitutional. Period. End of story.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on November 28, 2012 at 10:48 AM
The VERY first place to start, if you are serious about lowering the costs of health care, is by capping lawsuits for actual and punitive damages. The single most expensive cost in any doctor’s overhead is malpractice insurance. Unless and until that is addressed, than everything else is just rearranging the furniture.
Secondly, eliminate laws restricting folks from shopping for and purchasing health insurance across state lines. Treat it like every other form of insurance. Competition will always help lower costs.
TKindred on November 28, 2012 at 10:55 AM
Problem: We are supposed to be the party of the Constitution. There is no constitutional authority for the federal government to regulate malpractice lawsuits, which are handled in state courts according to state law. Tort reform is important, but it must happen state-by-state. Otherwise, we end up promoting even more federal government intervention which is not a good idea.
Shump on November 28, 2012 at 11:32 AM
From Scratch?
No tax deductions for medical care or the insurance that provides it, particularly at the company side of it.
Pay for what you get. If you cannot pay for your own or your family’s, then you will have to look to friends, the community and charity.
Get rid of the requirement for hospitals to provide care regardless of your ability to pay for it. Most of them will anyways. But it should be up to the individual providers to decide how much free service they are willing to provide.
For the love of country, get rid of Medicare/Medicaid.
astonerii on November 28, 2012 at 11:33 AM
I think when people start getting the bill for this, they will begin to see the light. Someone else mentioned that under obammycare with all the increased costs, he can’t afford to see a doctor. Plus the economy continues to tank.
Blake on November 28, 2012 at 11:40 AM
This is a tired meme. Tort reform has been proven NOT to have a significant impact on health care costs.
http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/meme-busting-tort-reform-cost-control-2/
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/local/new-study-tort-reform-has-not-reduced-health-care-/nRpcp/
cam2 on November 28, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Thats not necessarily true. How and when were these statistics compiled..and more importantly, analyzed?
That being said, why not use every cut available? If the “It’s not a big enough factor to consider” is to be the standard…then what is the number when attention should be given?
Mimzey on November 28, 2012 at 11:57 AM
In other words govern according to the constitution.
bgibbs1000 on November 28, 2012 at 12:00 PM
Too bad Roberts doesn’t agree….
nazo311 on November 28, 2012 at 12:18 PM
This article makes the common mistake of most conservative and libertarian thinkers, namely thinking and arguing logically.
Those voters that can be swayed, as we found in this last election, re-act, think, and vote on emotions. They do no think things through, they will not pull their hand out of the fire until they feel the burn, and they will always vote for free pie as long as they are told someone else will be paying for it. They will vote for whoever seems coolist, no matter what his policies are.
The only chance we have now to do away with O-care is when it blows up. At that point the Progs will try to blame Republicans for the disaster and we have to have find a way to blame it on them first. Not with logic, not with facts – the chowder heads in the squishy middle don’t care about that. We have to find some quick, emotional, easily understood soundbite that will pin this cr@p sandwich to the Dems, otherwise they will succeed in somehow blaming us for this thing they have inflicted on the country.
Boogeyman on November 28, 2012 at 12:27 PM
Spinmaster? Roy is a physician who has been involved with the clusterfart that is our health care system and knows a bit more than you would allow in your comment.
chimney sweep on November 28, 2012 at 12:32 PM
Benedict Roberts’ “reasoning” in his opinion was beyond a joke. He made the old Soviet courts look like paragons of logic. I don’t really care what he has to say about it. ObamaScare clearly IS un-Constitutional. Roberts isn’t qualified to sit on anything other than a park bench.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on November 28, 2012 at 1:02 PM
Errr …. that response was to
nazo311 on November 28, 2012 at 12:18 PM
Had something stuck in my clipboard.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on November 28, 2012 at 1:04 PM