Odds of GOP taking back the Senate in 2014 looking good — with the right candidates
By contrast, the early movement is a clear sign that Republicans view this midterm cycle, with President Obama in charge for the next four years, as a more inviting environment than 2012. Not only are Democrats defending more seats than Republicans (20 to 13) – after all, that did little to help them this November – but many of the most vulnerable Democratic senators hail from some of the most conservative states in the country, where Obama and Democrats have struggled badly over the last several years.
After losing two seats, newly-minted NRSC chairman Jerry Moran now needs to net six seats to win back control of the Senate. The formula is simple, but challenging: Win six of the 7 Democratic-held seats in states Romney carried (Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, Montana, North Carolina, South Dakota, West Virginia), or expand their wiggle room by ousting a vulnerable Democrat like Minnesota Sen. Al Franken. Republicans hardly face any exposure: Even with prospective primary challenges, only Maine Sen. Susan Collins is even remotely at risk this cycle against a Democrat. All told, the 2014 map is even more encouraging for Republicans, provided they land the right candidates…
Another encouraging sign for Republicans: Capito jumped in the race early, seemingly unconcerned about the threat of a primary challenge from the right. That’s a shift from last cycle, when party operatives speculate that recruitment suffered because enough prospective candidates passed on bids, wanting to avoid the risk of facing a more-ideologically pure primary opponent. When brand-name Republicans, like Tommy Thompson or George Allen aren’t deemed kosher by party activists, it makes it tougher for a lesser-known congressman with a few wayward votes to risk their job and, in turn, the nomination. (Think ex-Missouri Sen. Jim Talent or Rep. Jo Ann Emerson in Missouri; Reps. Jim Gerlach or Pat Meehan in Pennsylvania).








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Odds of increasing our representation among Titanic crew members looking good. So we’ve got that going for us. Yay.
Kataklysmic on November 28, 2012 at 6:27 PM
Here we go — again.
Just shut up already.
GOP/RNC is all but a rotting corpse.
FlatFoot on November 28, 2012 at 6:27 PM
Our chances of taking over the Senate this year were pretty damned good too, with the same caveat.
I’m not going to predict a takeover in 2014. We have too many people on our side who are psychologically and inherently incapable of seeing the big picture.
KingGold on November 28, 2012 at 6:28 PM
You’re right. We should nominate Akin/O’donnell’s and Murdock’s for every seat. See how that goes.
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 6:31 PM
Be careful who you nominate.
thebrokenrattle on November 28, 2012 at 6:32 PM
Perhaps this time around KingGold will finally get his much vaunted Coons-Castle match-up in Delaware. I wonder who would win. (But I really don’t.)
steebo77 on November 28, 2012 at 6:32 PM
this is an NJ piece. So i can only assume that the left is playing mind games with the Stupid Party. The Rs will get over confident, this must be MY TIME to be Famous and Rich…and dash out to a journo and set back the party another dozen years.
r keller on November 28, 2012 at 6:34 PM
The headlines this year should be “Odds of GOP reaching filibuster-proof majority in 2014 looking good.” It’s an f’ing shame.
Mark1971 on November 28, 2012 at 6:35 PM
Quick! Let’s nominate moderates like Thompson, Brown, and McMahon who are sure to win!
Stoic Patriot on November 28, 2012 at 6:35 PM
Angle, Mourdock, Akin, O’Donnell, and Buck worked out quite well.
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 6:36 PM
It won’t happen. There’s absolutely no reason for him to stick his neck out in a Republican primary again.
If, by some outside chance, he runs, I guarantee you that O’Donnell will smell the
moneypolitical opportunity and run again. Castle will lose again, and then O’Donnell will lose to Coons. That simple.KingGold on November 28, 2012 at 6:40 PM
Too bad there isn’t a race out there for Dino Rossi to lose this time around.
steebo77 on November 28, 2012 at 6:41 PM
How’d our True Conservative Senate candidate in Washington do this time around? Oh right, he told a reporter to f*ck himself and lost to Maria Cantwell in a landslide.
Moron.
KingGold on November 28, 2012 at 6:47 PM
That’s far more than “challenging”. AK and NC are probably the best bets, but after that it gets a lot more complicated. Pryor is pretty strong in AR, as is Landrieu in LA and Baucus in MT. Johnson may retire in SD, which would help, but that’s still a steep hill to climb, and WV still likes its Dems at the state and rep level.
Not to mention, of course, that with recent candidates like Angle and O’Donnell and Akin and Mourdock, I’m not optimistic we’ll do any better in ’14.
changer1701 on November 28, 2012 at 6:48 PM
I just don’t get why people keep bringing up O’Donnell and saying people voted for her because they thought she was a good candidate. Not many thought that. She was about sending a message about not promoting a guy to senator who spent his entire House career skewering Conservative principles.All of them, not just social ones.
I seriously doubt Castle would ever have won anyway.
Rocks on November 28, 2012 at 6:54 PM
or
How about we find people to nominate who are reasonably conservative and can actually articulate themselves without sounding or acting (1) like Thurston Howell III or (2) like Jimmy Swaggart.
I know it is hard but lets see if we can find a normal conservative person who has something called common sense.
William Eaton on November 28, 2012 at 7:01 PM
Almost any candidate would have lost to Cantwell, which is why no big-name Republicans ran.
And calling Baumgartner a True Con isn’t really accurate. Prior to the email to the blogger, he was most known for supporting marijuana legalization and increased government spending on education.
Also, the polling barely moved after the email to the blogger.
Moron.
steebo77 on November 28, 2012 at 7:02 PM
Fine with me. We need to stop nominating idiots just because they are the “most conservative”.
I guess you missed the pre-primary polls showing Castle beating Coons by a healthy margin.
And sending a message? That’s a REALLY good reason for throwing away a winnable seat. How many do you want to throw away? 5? 10?
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 7:06 PM
Folks, the Democrats didn’t do THAT well this cycle. Most of their gain was due to redistricting in blue states like California and Illinois. We lost two Senate seats net and two of those were due to candidates with foot in mouth disease.
We gained governors and seats in state legislatures.
We are in one heck of a lot better shape in January 2013 than we were in January 2009. Our chances look one heck of a lot better in 2014 than they did in 2010 even.
Obama won’t be on the top of the ticket and the 2014 electorate will look more like the 2010 electorate.
crosspatch on November 28, 2012 at 7:10 PM
True, but it would be helpful if the GOP elite would not back people like Crist over Rubio. That has nothing to do with conservatism, that is just lacking basic intelligence.
William Eaton on November 28, 2012 at 7:13 PM
It won’t matter. Thanks to Harry Reid, the United States hasn’t been operating under a budget since ’09. Even if the Republicans take the Senate in the ’14 elections, Obama will veto anything that makes it to his desk. Other than that, he’ll be a lame duck. Starting January 2015, the Presidential election for 2016 will be topic du jour.
2012 is what mattered. It’s gone and past. Let it burn.
Jurisprudence on November 28, 2012 at 7:15 PM
Lets hope we can get to 56 senators, and every add is a conservative.
Then we should impeach Obama.
astonerii on November 28, 2012 at 7:18 PM
Those polls were before Castle started taking his lumps, how were they after? That seat was about as winnable as Kennedy’s, Dodd’s and Lieberman’s. How many of those are occupied by Republican’s right now? If winning means having a guy like Castle be your party’s senator than I think the term winning has lost all meaning. If people want a liberal they will vote Democratic.
As far as throwing away seats I’d say 1 was enough. They got the message. It’s one thing to vote for a Brown or McMahon who pays lip service to conservatism at least. It’s a whole other thing to vote for a guy like Castle who touts his liberal record as his best feature.
Rocks on November 28, 2012 at 7:21 PM
However they could send bills up to Obama that will make him uncomfortable to veto, make the democrats look bad, or force his hand to make him look stupid.
William Eaton on November 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM
I am happy without the turncoats. Could care less about what you think.
astonerii on November 28, 2012 at 7:27 PM
The last polls before the primary had him winning by 10%.
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 7:29 PM
Put down the crack pipe.
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 7:30 PM
Stop making Akin part of this argument. A majority of Missouri republicans did not choose him and would not have if we had a runoff rule. Let us fix this oversight and we won’t have that problem.
The “right” candidate means the right candidate for the state, not the nation. Someone who is perfect for Louisiana might struggle in Montana. Even if the national GOP sentiment is closer to Louisiana, Montana Republicans should choose their nominee without national interference. If you want to go organize for or donate to a particular candidate, fine, but we need to find a way to avoid splitting the grassroots vote in the primaries as was done over and over this year.
alwaysfiredup on November 28, 2012 at 7:33 PM
True. Castle was the likeliest Republican to gave bipartisan cover to liberal legislation. He should have been expelled from the caucus or whipped into line a tad more often. It’s not feasible to keep “party” members who flout the party.
alwaysfiredup on November 28, 2012 at 7:36 PM
Yes, before he got ripped apart. O’Donnoll was able to take him down and that’s nothing compared to what the Dems would bring.
Rocks on November 28, 2012 at 7:37 PM
The Tea Party says otherwise.
Pablo Honey on November 28, 2012 at 7:39 PM
Anybody in NC or otherwise in the know have any idea who we’ll run there? Hagan should be a sitting duck, as long as we can avoid the sort of stupidity that’s plagued us in recruiting in recent cycle.
Not challenging Hagan is of the level of stupidity that has allowed McCaskill another six years, and yet I don’t know any obvious name that stands out, as most of our promising candidates are House freshmen starting next year… Who could emerge for us?
Gingotts on November 28, 2012 at 7:46 PM
Go Tea Party primary go! Which crazy candidates will the tea party force on the GOP this cycle? I, for one, can not wait.
libfreeordie on November 28, 2012 at 8:30 PM
Funny how the establishment GOP always harp on Akin, Christine O’donnall etc.. You never here them harping on;
Tommy Thompson- Wisc – loser
George allen-Va – loser
Rick Berg-ND – loser
Linda mcManhon-Ct – loser
Connie Mack-Fla – loser
Tom Smith-Pa – loser
Josh mandel-Ohio – loser
scott brown-ma – loser
Pete hoskra- Mich – loser
Denny Rehberg- Mt – loser
Heather wilson- NM – loser
They also picked losers in Ca./Wash./Vt./NY/Del/MD/NJ/RI/Minn
So conservatives lost 2, Mo (though our candidate in the primary Susan Steelman lost, thanks Huckabee, you rodent!) & Ind- However we won Tx/Az/Neb/utah
So conservatives record this cycle is 4-2
The establishment record 4- 17
Why don’t we have the tea party pick the senate candidates, obviously, the establishment don’t know what the fook they are doinf. 4 wins / 17 loses pitiful!
Danielvito on November 28, 2012 at 8:31 PM
Crawl back under your rock, nut job.
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 8:36 PM
Romney lost, deal with it….
idesign on November 28, 2012 at 8:40 PM
Stop being a cultist.
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM
Says the RINO..:)
idesign on November 28, 2012 at 8:43 PM
Is that your go to insult? call everyone you argue with a RINO?
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 8:48 PM
Not arguing with you, just stating a fact.
idesign on November 28, 2012 at 8:53 PM
wargamer6 on November 28, 2012 at 8:48 PM
No we can also call you a romneycare butt sniffer!
Danielvito on November 28, 2012 at 8:55 PM
Not half as crazy as some of the progressive picks.
The question is can the democrats win without the cult leader on the ballot.
William Eaton on November 28, 2012 at 8:55 PM