<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How did sequestration go from a bipartisan achievement to something to be avoided?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203180</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the corporate media&#039;s frequent use of the weighted term &quot;fiscal cliff&quot;, here is a good quote from a comment over at ZeroHedge about a similar topic that seems appropriate here as well.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-28/cost-kidding-yourself&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Propaganda 101 - Control the language and you control the mind. (See Edward Bernays).&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the corporate media&#8217;s frequent use of the weighted term &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;, here is a good quote from a comment over at ZeroHedge about a similar topic that seems appropriate here as well.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-28/cost-kidding-yourself" rel="nofollow">Propaganda 101 &#8211; Control the language and you control the mind. (See Edward Bernays).</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203129</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;But every other growing economy is at least as socialist as ours. For our borrowing costs to go up significantly, that would mean global markets had deemed some other economy more secure over the long term. What economy would that be, if every country on earth is making the same “mistakes” with regards to structuring their economy?

ernesto on November 28, 2012 at 4:41 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

What country has a robust growing economy?  What socialist country isn&#039;t struggling with debt and massive increases in the welfare state?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But every other growing economy is at least as socialist as ours. For our borrowing costs to go up significantly, that would mean global markets had deemed some other economy more secure over the long term. What economy would that be, if every country on earth is making the same “mistakes” with regards to structuring their economy?</p>
<p>ernesto on November 28, 2012 at 4:41 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>What country has a robust growing economy?  What socialist country isn&#8217;t struggling with debt and massive increases in the welfare state?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernesto</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203120</link>
		<dc:creator>ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;darwin on November 28, 2012 at 4:37 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

But every other growing economy is at least as socialist as ours. For our borrowing costs to go up significantly, that would mean global markets had deemed some other economy more secure over the long term. What economy would that be, if every country on earth is making the same &quot;mistakes&quot; with regards to structuring their economy?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>darwin on November 28, 2012 at 4:37 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>But every other growing economy is at least as socialist as ours. For our borrowing costs to go up significantly, that would mean global markets had deemed some other economy more secure over the long term. What economy would that be, if every country on earth is making the same &#8220;mistakes&#8221; with regards to structuring their economy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sekhmet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203118</link>
		<dc:creator>Sekhmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there were lots of things in the sequestration deal meant to be time bombs for an incoming R Administration. If we cliff-dive, they will go off in 0bama&#039;s Administration.

Burn Baby Burn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there were lots of things in the sequestration deal meant to be time bombs for an incoming R Administration. If we cliff-dive, they will go off in 0bama&#8217;s Administration.</p>
<p>Burn Baby Burn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203111</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; However, no one can ever point to a “point of no return” where our borrowing costs would actually rise. At what point would investors actually prefer keeping their money in a another country, and what country(s) might that be?

ernesto on November 28, 2012 at 3:43 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know.  Perhaps when they see socialist policies are slowly killing the economic machine that was America and our ability to pay back is gone.  We don&#039;t have much left ... commercial aircraft, technology ... we really are getting to the point of having nothing to offer as we&#039;re slowly being strangled by socialism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> However, no one can ever point to a “point of no return” where our borrowing costs would actually rise. At what point would investors actually prefer keeping their money in a another country, and what country(s) might that be?</p>
<p>ernesto on November 28, 2012 at 3:43 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know.  Perhaps when they see socialist policies are slowly killing the economic machine that was America and our ability to pay back is gone.  We don&#8217;t have much left &#8230; commercial aircraft, technology &#8230; we really are getting to the point of having nothing to offer as we&#8217;re slowly being strangled by socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203106</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;entagor on November 28, 2012 at 3:08 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So I was basically agreeing with you and the article above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>entagor on November 28, 2012 at 3:08 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So I was basically agreeing with you and the article above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenris</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203088</link>
		<dc:creator>Fenris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;...The President signed it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Now if he would just sign a budget.  I guess he did sign Bush&#039;s last budget, they passed it so late.  But I bet he goes his entire 8 years in office without signing another.  Any takers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;The President signed it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now if he would just sign a budget.  I guess he did sign Bush&#8217;s last budget, they passed it so late.  But I bet he goes his entire 8 years in office without signing another.  Any takers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203073</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ruling class rules with fear.

Don&#039;t fall for their chicken little BS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ruling class rules with fear.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t fall for their chicken little BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203070</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The so-called &quot;fiscal cliff&quot; is the only thing the Tea Party accomplished since their victory in &#039;10.  The budget is theoretically/supposedly slightly less un-balance this year than it would have been otherwise thanks to the raw deal the tea party got as part of the debt ceiling fight last year.

And tea party didn&#039;t even like that deal, it was a con job, but which nevertheless was billed as a victory for the Tea Party by them at the time according to the ruling class, and now the ruling class calls the so-called victory they foisted on the Tea Party a &quot;fiscal cliff&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The so-called &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; is the only thing the Tea Party accomplished since their victory in &#8217;10.  The budget is theoretically/supposedly slightly less un-balance this year than it would have been otherwise thanks to the raw deal the tea party got as part of the debt ceiling fight last year.</p>
<p>And tea party didn&#8217;t even like that deal, it was a con job, but which nevertheless was billed as a victory for the Tea Party by them at the time according to the ruling class, and now the ruling class calls the so-called victory they foisted on the Tea Party a &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2012/11/28/how-did-sequestration-go-from-a-bipartisan-achievement-to-something-to-be-avoided/comment-page-1/#comment-2203064</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=230772#comment-2203064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The original deal is looking pretty good right now, only because it is already in writing

We have the signatures of all involved. On the GOP side the RINOs and the ones they suckered. Also the moderates. On the left, the upper echlon

entagor on November 28, 2012 at 3:08 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Last year when the federal government, with the help of the corporate media, raised our credit limit with Bank of China over $16 trillion dollars they tried to excuse their profligacy by tricking Americans into thinking they were going to &quot;cut spending&quot; to reduce the deficit so that they wouldn&#039;t have to raise the credit limit again.  In reality they didn&#039;t cut spending even a bit, all they did was reduce the rate that spending increases each year.

Now the same ruling class that perpetrated that pathetic con job, that didn&#039;t even cut &lt;em&gt;real &lt;/em&gt;spending, are trying to claim that the &quot;spending cuts&quot;, (which again, only means spending doesn&#039;t increase quite as much as otherwise), is a fiscal cliff.

The truth is that the ruling class was dragged into their con-job &quot;spending cuts&quot; by the tea party and now are trying to undo it and trick the tea party into begging them to undo it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The original deal is looking pretty good right now, only because it is already in writing</p>
<p>We have the signatures of all involved. On the GOP side the RINOs and the ones they suckered. Also the moderates. On the left, the upper echlon</p>
<p>entagor on November 28, 2012 at 3:08 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Last year when the federal government, with the help of the corporate media, raised our credit limit with Bank of China over $16 trillion dollars they tried to excuse their profligacy by tricking Americans into thinking they were going to &#8220;cut spending&#8221; to reduce the deficit so that they wouldn&#8217;t have to raise the credit limit again.  In reality they didn&#8217;t cut spending even a bit, all they did was reduce the rate that spending increases each year.</p>
<p>Now the same ruling class that perpetrated that pathetic con job, that didn&#8217;t even cut <em>real </em>spending, are trying to claim that the &#8220;spending cuts&#8221;, (which again, only means spending doesn&#8217;t increase quite as much as otherwise), is a fiscal cliff.</p>
<p>The truth is that the ruling class was dragged into their con-job &#8220;spending cuts&#8221; by the tea party and now are trying to undo it and trick the tea party into begging them to undo it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>