Regarding Saxby Chambliss
A couple of years ago a mutual friend from Macon went up to see Saxby. There was a tea party rally going on. As our mutual friend sat in the office waiting for Saxby, his staff stood around ridiculing the tea party activists going by as simpletons, uneducated, hicks, and nuts. Chambliss himself has been overheard talking disparagingly of tea party activists in the Capitol Hill Club and elsewhere.
He has become entrenched in Washington, DC and thinks that we here in Georgia are the problem, not him. In 2005, he was convinced that we here in Georgia were the problem on immigration. Since then he’s been convinced that we here in Georgia are the problem by not sending enough money to Washington, D.C.
In fact, we here in Georgia should convince Saxby that we are a problem — his problem in his path to re-election. We can and should make him fight for it and, the Good Lord willing, drive him from office in 2014. Georgia requires that a candidate in a primary secure 50% of the vote to get to the general election. A couple of well funded challengers could pull Saxby below 50% thereby forcing a runoff fight between Saxby and a conservative challenger. Saxby, being from South Georgia, has a weakness in the metro-Atlanta area. That weakness, combined with a libertarian four years ago, forced Saxby into a runoff election.
A conservative from metro-Atlanta could put Saxby Chambliss in peril and we should work to make that happen.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Erick Erickson giving “Prayerful Consideration” To Primary Challenge Of Saxby Chambliss
commodore on November 27, 2012 at 7:30 PM
Erick Erickson for Senate!
(I kid. Obviously.)
steebo77 on November 27, 2012 at 7:31 PM
It just goes to show that RINOs are just as invested in BIG government as are the Democrats.
Federalism can strip these arrogant bastiges of all of their power, which is all they care about.
Charlemagne on November 27, 2012 at 7:31 PM
Georgia has a runoff rule. Texas has a runoff rule. Missouri really needs a runoff rule.
Saxby, the Tea Party saved your a$$ in 2010 and it’s disgusting how little you value their efforts. GTFO.
alwaysfiredup on November 27, 2012 at 7:31 PM
Maybe not so obviously…
Herman Cain should go for it.
alwaysfiredup on November 27, 2012 at 7:32 PM
Step aside RINOs.
faraway on November 27, 2012 at 7:33 PM
Cain would be fantastic.
We’ve all had our disagreements with Erick Erickson, but kudos to him for sticking his neck out if he decides to run. Would be a huge upgrade over Chambliss.
commodore on November 27, 2012 at 7:34 PM
Macon is not in metro-Atlanta.
faraway on November 27, 2012 at 7:36 PM
Well, obviously to me, and to anyone not named Erick-Woods Erickson.
steebo77 on November 27, 2012 at 7:37 PM
Proofreading?
radjah shelduck on November 27, 2012 at 7:43 PM
Yes, because that has worked out so well for us in other states. The criteria can’t just be “a conservative from metro Atlanta”. How about a conservative who’d also make a strong general election candidate? Do we have any of those?
changer1701 on November 27, 2012 at 7:53 PM
Would love for someone to run against Chambliss. It’s pathetic that a state like GA has senators like Isakson and Chambliss.
topdawg on November 27, 2012 at 7:53 PM
Yes, because those Georgia democrats are such a threat.
alwaysfiredup on November 27, 2012 at 7:55 PM
Karen Handel and Herman Cain. That would be a fun primary.
alwaysfiredup on November 27, 2012 at 7:55 PM
We have already begun work on it Erik. We thought about it last go round. Next go round he will be done. Ga. does not suffer his ilk well.
Bmore on November 27, 2012 at 8:14 PM
Sorry for misspelling your name Erick.
Bmore on November 27, 2012 at 8:15 PM
You’d think, after seeing how gimme Senate races in other red states have gone, that you’d know better. Guess not.
I’m no fan of Chambliss, but it’s not as simple as just picking someone more conservative.
changer1701 on November 27, 2012 at 8:16 PM
Good evening!!..
Dire Straits on November 27, 2012 at 8:24 PM
Snort.
Let’s see, who gets to be the first to bring up when he wrote that David Souter was a goat-f*cking child molester, and when he averred that Ted Kennedy purposely died in his Senate seat to advance Obamacare?
KingGold on November 27, 2012 at 8:59 PM
Pffftt… yeah right.
NeoKong on November 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM
That would be…interesting…but I think Tom Price, a conservative Congressman from the northern suburbs, would seem to fit Erick’s criteria better.
PerceptorII on November 27, 2012 at 9:51 PM
I don’t know if Erickson would be an improvement. He has a rather high opinion of himself and doesn’t seem to get the lessons of 2010/2012.
amazingmets on November 27, 2012 at 9:56 PM