Pentagon reassures: A human will always decide when a robot kills you
The Pentagon wants to make perfectly clear that every time one of its flying robots releases its lethal payload, it’s the result of a decision made by an accountable human being in a lawful chain of command. Human rights groups and nervous citizens fear that technological advances in autonomy will slowly lead to the day when robots make that critical decision for themselves. But according to a new policy directive issued by a top Pentagon official, there shall be no SkyNet, thank you very much.
Here’s what happened while you were preparing for Thanksgiving: Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter signed, on November 21, a series of instructions to “minimize the probability and consequences of failures” in autonomous or semi-autonomous armed robots “that could lead to unintended engagements,” starting at the design stage (.pdf, thanks to Cryptome.org). Translated from the bureaucrat, the Pentagon wants to make sure that there isn’t a circumstance when one of the military’s many Predators, Reapers, drone-like missiles or other deadly robots effectively automatizes the decision to harm a human being.
The hardware and software controlling a deadly robot needs to come equipped with “safeties, anti-tamper mechanisms, and information assurance.” The design has got to have proper “human-machine interfaces and controls.” And, above all, it has to operate “consistent with commander and operator intentions and, if unable to do so, terminate engagements or seek additional human operator input before continuing the engagement.” If not, the Pentagon isn’t going to buy it or use it.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Not if cyborgs have their say about it.
John the Libertarian on November 27, 2012 at 9:43 AM
Color me un-reassured.
libfreeordie on November 27, 2012 at 9:50 AM
The bad news, it will probably be a unionized human under orders from the Bark administration.
Where’s the popular movement to strip Preznit DroneStrike of his peace prize? What do you mean it’s different for him than it was for Dubya? Shut up? What?
Bishop on November 27, 2012 at 9:55 AM
Unless the robot is self-aware.
Oil Can on November 27, 2012 at 9:56 AM
That sounds good, but only if it’s Obama deciding to kill me.
forest on November 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM
Until our enemies start building fully autonomous killbots.
ZenDraken on November 27, 2012 at 10:02 AM
Human beings will always be in ultimate control of drones or robots, but someday they will kill without someone having to push a button. That doesn’t mean they are intelligent or malicious. That means software and hardware advancements will allow them to terminate targets based upon preprogrammed parameters. The issue, even in this future warscape, will still be who is controlling the weapons and to what ends just as it is today. Not whether or not machines are too smart.
NotCoach on November 27, 2012 at 10:03 AM
Probably you should start advocating for the freedom to own shoulder mounted rocket launchers to protect yourself from “autonomous” drones.
NotCoach on November 27, 2012 at 10:04 AM
When we kill, it’s always with that special human touch…
/Democrats
Wanderlust on November 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM
That’ll work great until some nutcase points one at an airliner (“they’re all spying on me!!!”) or a terrorist lets one fly at a tanker truck refilling a gas station’s underground stores. And you’ll need to see or hear the drone first, which is not easy as people think.
…in all seriousness, where does this line of thought end? Private citizens really cannot afford protection from every possible kind of government intrusion, much less the training to use it effectively.
MelonCollie on November 27, 2012 at 10:12 AM
Don’t believe it.
They’re already working to make them semi-autonomous – you know, coming up with the entire solution then offering the pilot operator a simple Barky Kill List style ‘Yes / No / Maybe after Golf’ decision tree.
CorporatePiggy on November 27, 2012 at 10:28 AM
That’s what federalism is for. Quite frankly any federal law that prohibits arms possession of any arms that can be carried is unconstitutional. It is something each state is responsible for, thus also making them responsible for protecting us from federal tyranny. If a state wants to allow shoulder fired rockets to be possessed by civilians I say go for it. If the federal government wants to block that I say STFU (to the feds). The states can make reasonable laws concerning arms (as long as the law doesn’t disarm us), but to me the 2nd Amendment is quite clear on this responsibility being entirely with the states.
As far as the average citizen protecting ourselves from government muscle that ship sailed decades ago. How do any of us stop a nuke? Just one more reason why we need to bring the federal government back under control of the states.
NotCoach on November 27, 2012 at 10:28 AM
Why? You LIKE Obama having this kind of power. You SUPPORT him having this power.
You should be giddy.
Washington Nearsider on November 27, 2012 at 10:31 AM
Kyle Reese is unavailable for comment.
RDH on November 27, 2012 at 10:35 AM
POTUSbot is now killing the country. Seems like he doesn’t need any help from humans.
Akzed on November 27, 2012 at 10:35 AM
Where is Isaac Asimov and the laws of robotics when you need him.
chemman on November 27, 2012 at 10:50 AM
So you have opted for the illusion of personal peace and affluence over freedom. Enjoy it while you can.
chemman on November 27, 2012 at 10:53 AM
Wipe the smug little grin off your face, b!tch. I’m stating the REALITY that we can’t all afford SAM’s. Your John Wayne fantasies and your superiority complex won’t protect you from the full wrath of the feds.
MelonCollie on November 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM
Somewhere, TOTUS is enjoying an evil chuckle.
TexasDan on November 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM
“Nicto….Barata….Klatuu”
tommyboy on November 27, 2012 at 11:25 AM
*Gort vaporizes you for saying it backwards, thus reversing the meaning. Then it goes and looks for everyone named Sarah Connor.*
NotCoach on November 27, 2012 at 11:34 AM
Wait a sec. Are you sure we aren’t just dealing with a dyslexic robot.
tommyboy on November 27, 2012 at 11:39 AM
No. Unfortunately though human dyslexia just might get us all killed by a 1950′s era communist pile of scrap metal.
Klaatu barada nikto
NotCoach on November 27, 2012 at 11:46 AM
Damn foreign killer robots. If they’re going to invade our country they should learn to speak english!
tommyboy on November 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM