Comments on: ObamaCare must be on the table in fiscal cliff negotiations

By: Fleuries

Fleuries — Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:57:51 +0000

No agreements without a real written budget.

No increase in the debt cieling without a real written budget. Shut it all down.

Pass a Christmas bill ordering that the withholding tables be allowed to stay the same until the negotiations are settled. There is no reason that they have to change for the year on January 1. The democrats are using that point in the negotiations so they can blame republicans for raising everyone’s taxes in their paycheck. Rules can be changed. Obama does it all the time, if he cares he will suspend this rule, if he does not, he is a bastard.

There is no reason on God’s earth that it should cost so much money to implement health care that you have to buy yourself. I think Rush says they have already spent many times more than the cost of just writing everyone without insurance a tax credit and letting them buy what they want. They are megalomaniac micro managers. They have to cut costs now, they are operating like they have a blank check. And no one who didn’t have health insurance as of yet has been helped.

By: Badger40

Badger40 — Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:49:19 +0000

I don’t care if you do get rid of Obamacare. This will not solve our problems.
It’s passage only made the cliff loom nearer.

By: BobMbx

BobMbx — Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:37:51 +0000

Forget a deal. The wisest men on the planet devised the ‘fiscal cliff’, so lets see how well it works.

And there’s enough credit to go around, beginning with the POTUS signature on the sequestration bill.

Boom. Let it blow up in their faces. All of them.

B+

By: forest

forest — Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:33:09 +0000

Well, that sure is ambitious. Especially since half the Democrats actually want sequestration.

By: mwbri

mwbri — Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:31:52 +0000

I am surprised that the Republicans do not have a lot of cards for negotiations, but Obamacare is one that they must play. Now, will they do it?