Drone wars: The frightening truth is that we have to trust our elected leaders
The sobering conclusion of this analysis is that drone use will always lie on the borderline of the rule of law. It is therefore highly improbable that anyone could devise a workable system of constitutional rights to protect persons against unlawful drone attacks by the U.S. or other sovereign nations. The ACLU tends to attach more weight than most to due process and individual privacy. In its Congressional testimony, it has taken the position that some use of drones in international affairs is unconstitutional, especially those targeted against United States citizens.
It is likely that the ACLU’s position will gain traction before the courts of law and the courts of public opinion. On the former, it is worth stressing repeatedly that our major constitutional safeguards for individual rights extend to all natural persons, whether citizens or aliens. The writ of habeas corpus, for instance, is available to aliens as well as citizens. The Fifth Amendment states that “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.”…
The potential targets of drone attacks have no intention of subjecting themselves to the authority of the United States, so the only option left is to pursue them in territories where the United States exerts no effective control. In these settings, the futility of trial forces the government to take the controversial military option.
In dealing with that calculus, the United States could take citizenship into account in making its decision. But which way should that cut? Does a citizen deserve extra rights against the government that he has betrayed? Or should he be subject to additional sanctions? There is no clear answer, which is why U.S. policy on drone use for targeted attacks will remain an open wound in the body politic. It is both frightening and necessary to have to place such extensive trust in our public officials. But, when it comes to matters of national security, there is no other choice.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I foresee drone attacks by environmental groups to stop whalers, farmers, fishermen, hunters, etc.
faraway on November 27, 2012 at 7:49 PM
No, we don’t have to trust them. Impeach the War Criminal, Obama, Now!
Blake on November 27, 2012 at 7:54 PM
That’s the least of it. Drone surveillance and rogue drone attacks will change the way we live. Sad day it is.
petefrt on November 27, 2012 at 8:05 PM
Trust them? How is that possible, and why should we try?
“When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”
petefrt on November 27, 2012 at 8:09 PM
Naw,
I don’t think I trust my government, other than trust it to do the wrong thing.
ProfShadow on November 27, 2012 at 8:15 PM
The truth is that we should not trust them. I have seen first hand how a government can wrongly identify and punish regular civilians as terrorists. Fortunately, they were not executed and after many years they were exonerated and released. This is a very tricky subject because of the danger posed to the public by criminals and terrorists but we need to constantly ask questions about what our government does in our name especially when that involves targeted killings. I am prepared to support targeted killings but I think we have some ways to go in order to make sure the system targets the right people and the entire process has appropriate checks and balances as well as accountability when things go wrong. Things will go wrong… you can count on that.
lexhamfox on November 27, 2012 at 8:36 PM
For US citizens, a trial is required. And not in secret. If the government is going to kill a US citizen, it has to be after due process. Even if that means tipping your hand.
We used to use wanted posters…”WANTED: Billy The Kid; Dead or Alive”
These folks know they’re in the crosshairs. Give them a fair trial and then hang’em.
BobMbx on November 27, 2012 at 8:58 PM
Exactly. The minute we give the POTUS the power to order US citizens killed without trial, combined with the
EnablingPatriot Act we’ve reached 1776 levels of tyranny.MelonCollie on November 27, 2012 at 9:34 PM