Round up the usual social conservative suspects
Contrary to the prevailing stereotype, evangelicals and Catholics aren’t single-issue voters. They care about jobs, taxes and the deficit, and their support for Israel rivals that of the Jewish community. They played an indispensable role in re-electing the Republican House majority, and in electing 30 Republican governors and hundreds of state legislators and local officeholders in recent years. Jettisoning these voters and their issues would be like a football coach responding to a big loss by cutting the team’s leading rusher.
To be sure, the Republicans need to build bridges to Hispanics and minorities, women and younger voters. But unlike the conventional wisdom, social issues properly framed are one of the keys to a stronger, more diverse Republican coalition.
According to Gallup, a majority of Americans now consider themselves pro-life, including one-third of Democrats. Younger voters are one of the most pro-life segments of the electorate, with 51% of college-age “millennials” stating that having an abortion is morally wrong. A 2012 survey of voters 30 years or younger by Naral Pro-Choice America found that pro-life voters were twice as likely as their pro-choice peers to say abortion is an important issue in determining their vote.
Despite the Obama campaign’s accusation of a Republican “war on women,” Mr. Obama actually won women by a narrower margin than he did in 2008; he lost married women by seven points. Nor did single women—who went heavily Mr. Obama’s way—vote on reproductive issues. Forty-five percent of single women voters listed jobs and the economy as their most important issues, while only 8% said abortion.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Wait? We’re counting on the GOP to properly frame something?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Good one. The GOP allows the Dems to frame a strawman and then ignores the issue entirely until asked about the strawman from the media in a “how often do you beat your wife” style.
besser tot als rot on November 26, 2012 at 2:19 PM
#winning
Kataklysmic on November 26, 2012 at 2:23 PM
All socons care about is abortion.
Reed proves it himself here by giving a little lip service to other things at the beginning, and then going into that old America-really-wants-to-ban-abortion thing.
Moesart on November 26, 2012 at 2:24 PM
besser tot als rot on November 26, 2012 at 2:19 PM
++1000
melle1228 on November 26, 2012 at 2:25 PM
Umm.. How about we discuss the Evangelicals who couldn’t bring themselves to vote for a Mormon?
Illinidiva on November 26, 2012 at 2:25 PM
And clearly you and your fellows are ill-equipped to do so. Akin and Mourdock set social conservatism back ten years.
Why don’t you quit and hand off the reins to someone who actually lives in this decade.
KingGold on November 26, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Were there really that many of them?
apostic on November 26, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Because despite fearmongering they were quite rare. Tennessee’s support for Romney was overwhelming in the evangelical community.
Actually alot of us care more about NOT PAYING for those social issues..
melle1228 on November 26, 2012 at 2:30 PM
Who do you think all those missing voters were?
Illinidiva on November 26, 2012 at 2:36 PM
They were all evangelicals. /illinidiva logic
tom daschle concerned on November 26, 2012 at 2:37 PM
Without social conservatives, the GOP couldn’t get a dogcatcher elected.
Those who advocate purging the party of socons do not have the party’s best interests in mind.
Rebar on November 26, 2012 at 2:38 PM
Yeah because no libertarians voted for Gary Johnson.. no libertarians stayed home.. It was just those bigoted evangelicals who refused to vote for a Mormon..//
melle1228 on November 26, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Who do you think all those missing voters were?
Illinidiva on November 26, 2012 at 2:36 PM
Americans who, evidently, did not wish to vote for either Obama or romney.
kingsjester on November 26, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Racism ails the land, propagated by Obama.
Schadenfreude on November 26, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Principals have no principles.
Schadenfreude on November 26, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Why is it that the statistics provided and the results of the election do not match?
So all these so called pro-life people very concerned about jobs and the economy and not birth control all voted for Obama….?
Hmmm…..
NeoKong on November 26, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Bigots and other assorted creeps.
Schadenfreude on November 26, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Bigots, and Paulites and Palinites…may all them and families be utterly destroyed by Obama and his dictatorship.
Schadenfreude on November 26, 2012 at 2:42 PM
People who (i) listened to Obama’s un-rebutted strawmen of Romney and GOP policy for the entire summer, (ii) then watched the debates where Romney bear hugged Obama on policy and (iii) thought that at best Romney would be no different from Obama (Romney’s version), or at worst he’d be a catastrophe (Obama’s version). Why vote?
besser tot als rot on November 26, 2012 at 2:44 PM
Emphasis added.
These issues need not be and should not be framed in purely religious terms.
novaculus on November 26, 2012 at 2:44 PM
Evangelicals make a convenient scapegoat, but the stats say otherwise.
Romney received a larger slice of the evangelical vote than any previous Republican presidential candidate.
and
Seventy-eight percent of white evangelical Christians went for Romney, up from 74 percent for 2008 Republican presidential nominee John McCain. Those voters were 26 percent of the electorate this year, as they were in 2008.
Repeating a lie as truth is a mark of Leftist propaganda.
INC on November 26, 2012 at 2:46 PM
That was laid to rest soon after the election. I’m surprised to see it rearing its ugly head again.
INC on November 26, 2012 at 2:48 PM
Is voter fraud any place in this? I would bet that if the truth be known, I know that ‘truth’ is foreign with bho/team, that that is why bho and a number of d’s won was fraud? And some great r’s lost was voter fraud? It is too late to get facts, but one has to ask the questions?
L
letget on November 26, 2012 at 2:51 PM
Not surprising when people don’t want to blame the candidate.
besser tot als rot on November 26, 2012 at 2:51 PM
It’s to the advantage of the Boehner/Bush wing of the party to ensure that evangelicals are blamed for their failure. Remember, more important than winning the election for them is retaining their own positions of power within DC and the party.
Doomberg on November 26, 2012 at 2:53 PM
How about McCain getting more Mormon voters than Romney?
Break that down for us. M’kay?
portlandon on November 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM
THAT I do not understand. If any Mormon’s here might give a clue as to why? And the fact Love lost in Utah and she is a Mormon also.
I can’t get my head around those two things.
L
letget on November 26, 2012 at 3:02 PM
I’m a Mormon with a decent feel for where other Mormons are at politically and I am at a complete loss to explain this. Every Mormon I know of was completely fired up to vote for both McCain and Romney. There must be a growing contingent of Reid/Huntsman types that stay in the closet.
Kataklysmic on November 26, 2012 at 3:10 PM
Missing voters? What’s a missing voter?
alchemist19 on November 26, 2012 at 3:14 PM
We lost this one because we didn’t take their machine and their base seriously. Not because of social issues, or whatever. We need to fix these glaring omissions we have up until now been able to bypass in our post-election analyses:
Youth: We need to pop the higher-ed bubble. It’s harder to organize 18-24′s to go to the polls when larger portions of them are diverted from the universities, and harder to organize the ones remaining at university when necessity forces a re-focus on the core curriculum from the diversions of vyctym studies.
Minorities: Part of this will take care of itself. The Mayor of San Antonio had to *learn* Spanish (and we can bring that up at every opportunity we can). That won’t play so well with Hispanics. As for everybody else the Dems have, we’re talking whiter than chalk. The dependent ones are likely to watch Santa Claus die.
Media: What we can do now in the House, then do in ’14 in the Senate is to implement ethics rules preventing staffers from being hired from media companies, and staffers from seeking jobs with media companies for a good five years. Once Betty Reporterette can’t get a job with Bobby Press-Secretary, and Bobby can’t end up as a celebrity political analyst with Betty’s news org, let’s see how many punches they pull.
Women: Death of Santa Claus will do for them as well. The state-dependent women will have to hold their 0bamaphones together with duct tape, and the bobo middle class women will be too poor to do anything with their free birth control.
Sekhmet on November 26, 2012 at 3:22 PM
Actually, its the other way around.
Prog/lefties have 3 issues that they base their voter decisions on.
1. Abortion.
2. Homoz.
3. How to stop Whitey from oppressin’ da brotha’s n sista’s of all color…(except, of course, “Whitey”).
Mimzey on November 26, 2012 at 3:25 PM
Thank you for your response. Could it be that they just stayed home for some reason and didn’t vote? Or as you said, reid and huntsman got to them? GADS, if that is the case they believe reid will help the US, I feel sorry for them.
L
letget on November 26, 2012 at 3:28 PM
A cat has only nine lives….
apostic on November 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM
Excuse me? If American Jews supported Israel at all, they would not vote Democrat in the numbers that they do. Therefore, I’d say SoCons’ support of Israel is at least a thousandfold that of American Jews.
Odysseus on November 26, 2012 at 3:34 PM
Forgive me, please, for thinking that the government’s foremost responsibility is protecting the lives of its citizens. Forgive me, if you can, for thinking that without a meaningful protection of the right to life, all the other rights are rendered moot. There is no liberty without life, there is no anything without life.
vegconservative on November 26, 2012 at 3:36 PM
Conservatives of every stripe were never on board with Romney in the primary, until every one of the other guys self-destructed.
This establishment idea that conservatives will vote for whatever RINO they put in front of them, is wrong.
Rebar on November 26, 2012 at 3:36 PM
I no longer believe there is any institution that is safe from creeping liberal infiltration, my church included. I take comfort in the fact that the next time our leadership asks us to to stand up for traditional marriage a good number of these people will hit the bricks.
Kataklysmic on November 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM
Which is why it’s a good thing we have primary elections and the base gets to pick a candidate for themselves.
alchemist19 on November 26, 2012 at 3:41 PM
I know, I was one of them.
I had many problems with Romney until I considered the alternative. If conservative Mormons didn’t vote for Romney because he wasn’t conservative enough, I didn’t hear about it. Anecdotal I know but I figure if the sentiment was that pervasive, I would have encountered it at least once in many political conversations.
Kataklysmic on November 26, 2012 at 3:43 PM
You can’t vote for a candidate who doesn’t run.
The biggest story no one is talking about is, why didn’t a single true conservative throw their hat into the ring.
Rebar on November 26, 2012 at 3:45 PM
What missing voters? Romney got more than McCain and performed better in most of the swing states than Bush did.
Romney didn’t win because too many Dems showed up. That’s what it boils down to. There are more of them, so when you have a D +6 electorate the Republican is pretty much doomed. Romney even got more crossover support than Obama did…wasn’t enough to overcome the sheer number advantage Dems enjoyed.
changer1701 on November 26, 2012 at 4:02 PM
We lost because the media frames every issue the lefty way. Even FOX has extreme lives on all the time.
Most democrat voters never actually hear our point of view. Ever.
The media must be fought. Now.
Maybe we all buy Comcast stock.
GardenGnome on November 26, 2012 at 4:08 PM
False. Abortion is my #1 priority, but I still care about illegal immigration, marriage, affirmative action, the death penalty, mandatory criminal sentencing, vigorous drug-law enforcement, educational standards, etceteras.
I don’t need to stop caring about abortion, or diminish its primacy as the issue of our time, to care about those.
Probably because they’re statistically insignificant. You’ll find that people couldn’t bring themselves to vote for a social liberal like Romney. That had nothing to do with his Mormonism.
Stoic Patriot on November 26, 2012 at 4:13 PM
You can’t vote for a candidate who doesn’t run but there was nothing stopping anyone who wanted to from throwing their hat in the ring. Anyone who didn’t, either because they think Obama isn’t that great a threat or because they just have better things to do than to save the country I love, wasn’t worthy of consideration anyway.
alchemist19 on November 26, 2012 at 4:17 PM
Several true cons threw their names in the ring: Santorum, Cain, Bachmann, etc. None were presidential-caliber. No individual with a serious shot at the presidency was going to a) fight the Romney machine for b) a weak chance at beating the Historic First Black PresidentTM. And I don’t just mean Palin. I mean Ryan, Daniels, Walker, Portman, Rice, and other good options. Half the 2012 GOP field was just running to raise their profile, they weren’t serious about it. Others took themselves seriously but would never, ever have won a primary election (Paul, Johnson, Huntsman). It’s foolish to believe that anyone could toss their hat in the ring. It takes money, organization, devoted fans and, if not friends, then few enemies in the federal and state party apparatus-es (apparati?). That pretty severely narrows down the options.
alwaysfiredup on November 26, 2012 at 5:07 PM