Comments on: Jailed Mohammed filmmaker: No apologies

By: profitsbeard

profitsbeard — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:27:20 +0000

George was apparently Mohammad Rasoel's middle name, like Hussein is Barack Obama's. The future must not belong to those who insult George!

By: Warner Todd Huston

Warner Todd Huston — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:23:03 +0000

Good for him. His movie sucked, but his manhood is in tact.

By: AndStatistics

AndStatistics — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:08:29 +0000

an ancient tribal villain named George

…cuz “George” was such a common name back in the ancient tribal days. What?

But seriously, I really don’t know what to make of this guy – on the one hand, he has his beliefs and isn’t backing down from them no matter what pressure is put on him, which is good, I suppose. On the other, “methamphetamine ingredient supplier and convicted con man” is not usually the kind of person I like to throw my support behind.

By: MelonCollie

MelonCollie — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:03:39 +0000

OK, well that clearly went right over your head.

CorporatePiggy on November 26, 2012 at 10:55 AM

Seeing as how he’d make Napoleon look tall, that’s not too hard.

By: MelonCollie

MelonCollie — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:01:26 +0000

Not even to the actors he defrauded? abobo on November 26, 2012 at 10:22 AM

At this point would any of them even WANT payment for it? I mean, if I had been an actor in that shoddily made, playground-insult level excuse for a film (which it is despite the gibberings of the likes of people who think South Park is comparable to Shakespheare), I would want to be compensated if nothing else than for degrading myself by appearing in it. But after the film has attracted worldwide attention and the wrath of a major religion? Lets all drop the Internet bravery, folks, would you really want to be associated with it and its maker?

By: CorporatePiggy

CorporatePiggy — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:55:55 +0000

ThePrimordialOrderedPair on November 26, 2012 at 10:47 AM

OK, well that clearly went right over your head.

By: ThePrimordialOrderedPair

ThePrimordialOrderedPair — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:47:00 +0000

the text of the Koran does indeed bear a striking resemblance to a lot of the Old Testament.

Hardly. That has to be one of the dumbest statements I’ve ever seen. The parts of the Old Testament that the koran plagiarized it perverted and turned on their heads. Get a brain.

By: CorporatePiggy

CorporatePiggy — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:40:55 +0000

The movie was hardly controversial. The historical Mohammed was a blood thirsty pedofile, a warlord, and the text of the Koran does indeed bear a striking resemblance to a lot of the Old Testament.

Whether he enjoyed having sex with men and animals we’re not sure of but that movie about Jesus getting it on with Mary Magdalen was also speculative.

By: ThePrimordialOrderedPair

ThePrimordialOrderedPair — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:38:26 +0000

I found the Innocence of Muslims trailer to be extremely funny, biting and true to the word and traditions of the koran and islam. The movie looked to be hysterical and an excellent piece of work. The idiots (even those fools on the right who cow-tow to Barky’s position) who claim that this film was poorly-made, amateurish, or offensive have probably not seen it, or worse, probably don’t understand that it is, by and large, true to the accdepted story of mohammed and the political ideology he founded. I hear lots of these idiots talk about cheap production and the like but the sets and effects for this film were no different from those used on SNL, which people seem to take seriously – for whatever reason.

Innocence of Muslims is worth a watch. It’s funny, accurate and biting commentary on the aggressive, violent, primitive, universally expansionist political ideology that is islam.

By: abobo

abobo — Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:22:58 +0000

Not even to the actors he defrauded?