How about a minimum tax on the rich?
This outrage points to the necessity for more than a simple revision in upper-end tax rates, though that’s the place to start. I support President Obama’s proposal to eliminate the Bush tax cuts for high-income taxpayers. However, I prefer a cutoff point somewhat above $250,000 — maybe $500,000 or so.
Additionally, we need Congress, right now, to enact a minimum tax on high incomes. I would suggest 30 percent of taxable income between $1 million and $10 million, and 35 percent on amounts above that. A plain and simple rule like that will block the efforts of lobbyists, lawyers and contribution-hungry legislators to keep the ultrarich paying rates well below those incurred by people with income just a tiny fraction of ours. Only a minimum tax on very high incomes will prevent the stated tax rate from being eviscerated by these warriors for the wealthy.
Above all, we should not postpone these changes in the name of “reforming” the tax code. True, changes are badly needed. We need to get rid of arrangements like “carried interest” that enable income from labor to be magically converted into capital gains. And it’s sickening that a Cayman Islands mail drop can be central to tax maneuvering by wealthy individuals and corporations.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
On wealth taxes:
It would most likely take a constitutional amendment since the 16th amendment only applies to INCOME and Supreme Court precedent is quite clear that a liquidity event is required.
Resist We Much on November 26, 2012 at 1:31 PM
So what are we to lavish you with praise because you’re gainfully employed? Congrats, fuqhead. Once was a time people didn’t expect an atta boy for working to put food on the table.
The Count on November 26, 2012 at 1:33 PM
How about a blowhard tax?
besser tot als rot on November 26, 2012 at 1:39 PM
How about a means tested income tax? Tax the 10th million at a higher rate than the 1st million on a sliding scale so people can actually become rich.
stvnscott on November 26, 2012 at 1:49 PM
ernesto on November 26, 2012 at 2:31 PM
Any objections? Or should the wealthy pay much less as a percentage of their income than some poor schlub who spends his whole paycheck simply trying to attain food, clothing, and shelter?
ernesto on November 26, 2012 at 2:32 PM
Actually, Warren needs to get out more often. He needs to talk to people like me. I am no figment of Grover Norquist’s imagination.
Resist We Much on November 26, 2012 at 2:34 PM
Here are the tax rates. At what income income does the percentage of tax liability start going down?
tom daschle concerned on November 26, 2012 at 2:42 PM
Warren Buffett could care less how his newly acquired sense of noblesse oblige would affect the US economy. He knows that he is very close to the end of his life and he simply wishes to be beatified by his fellow class warriors. He wants a huge, televised funeral, standing room only, bulging with the weeping and wailing poor.
Catahoula on November 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM
Rich liberals are trying to make it harder for anyone else to start a business or get rich themselves. Hypocrites, every single one of them.
bitsy on November 26, 2012 at 3:01 PM
How about a maximum Tax amendment? The feds, state, and locals as a whole can only take up to X% of a man’s working year’s income during times of peace.
Chubbs65 on November 26, 2012 at 3:05 PM
Warren Buffett is a good example of why I sometimes think we do need a wealth tax on certain people. It is amazing how how many rich old geezers, mostly Hollywood and investor types, are so in love with higher taxes on incomes, which might not affect Buffett as much.
Or better yet a total limit on all combined deductions of $50,000.
That would prevent all those lefty rich people and academics from setting up those “non-profit” foundations (that only use their donations to limit freedom in this country).
William Eaton on November 26, 2012 at 3:07 PM
I’d also would want an inflation deduction for when the government decides to live outside their means.
Chubbs65 on November 26, 2012 at 3:07 PM
Sounds awesome! Maybe we could call it the Alternative Minimum Tax.
hawksruleva on November 26, 2012 at 3:10 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2